That fans have little more imagination than many NFL GMs.Mothman wrote: What does tell you?

Moderator: Moderators
That fans have little more imagination than many NFL GMs.Mothman wrote: What does tell you?
It's a good thing the team's GM doesn't have too much of an imagination ... I don't think I'd like them finding a reason to trade every mid-round rookie who shows talent but isn't needed as a starter *immedately*.Eli wrote: That fans have little more imagination than many NFL GMs.
@StribDW: Loudest roar of the day. Ponder to Jerome Simpson for 76 yards. Beat Winfield up right sideline.
And in discussions last year where some suggested trading Allen (because this team isn't likely to have a winning season before Allen is in a nursing home) everyone insisted he'd be playing and getting double digit sacks until he's 38.Cliff wrote:Anybody remember what DE looked like before JA? That guy is no spring chicken either.
The average retirement age in the NFL is what ... 30?
I don't think a lack of imagination has anything to do with it. There's just no reason to trade a player unless it's going to improve the team in either the short term or the long term. Trading Griffen could do that but it would take just the right deal and I think that would be hard to find. It could also be viewed as short term thinking. At 24, he could be an asset to the Vikes for most of the next decade if he lives up to his potential.Eli wrote: And in discussions last year where some suggested trading Allen (because this team isn't likely to have a winning season before Allen is in a nursing home) everyone insisted he'd be playing and getting double digit sacks until he's 38.
Like I said, there little imagination today in the NFL, except maybe in the Patriots organization.
No, I'd just he rather keep his mouth shut then say stupid nonsense like that.You're telling me you want Frazier too bash his players in public?
We took the best HB in college football in the top 10 and had barely average Chester Taylor as our starter. And it was hindsight? No, it wasn't hindsight. It was obvious who should be starting. From the time he was drafted until the idiot head coach finally started him.To be fair, even starting Chester Taylor ahead of Peterson was only a bad idea in hindsight.
Maybe they'll be forced to give Robison and Allen less snaps to get Griffen out there. Instead of trotting them out there every snap until Allen is gasping for breath. (We've had this discussion before! And other then "you don't sit Allen unless Allen wants to be sit" can't find many reasons not to give him a break now and then). Or heck how about let him compete with Robison now that they've moved him back. Or is Robison just that good?but if you're unable to figure out how to use a potentially valuable player
@TomPelissero: Really liking what I've seen from Josh Robinson since he came back from the hamstring. Could rise quickly if this continues. #Vikings
@TomPelissero: Helluva catch by Kyle Rudolph in red zone period over Tyrone McKenzie. He doesn't need to be open.
@TomPelissero: I've now counted 10 snaps and two touches for Peterson. Defenders steering clear. He does look pretty good all things considered.
@TomPelissero: Another crazy catch for starters, with Percy Harvin elevating to pull it in in back of end zone. Offense struggled early. Now rolling.
@StribDW: Jamarca Sanford on orders given to the D about Adrian Peterson: “The rules are simple. Do not touch 28. If you touch him, you’re cut.”
LOL! That's nice and clear.dead_poet wrote:
Mothman wrote:I like that comment about Rudolph too: "he doesn't need to be open".
Moss? That guy used to make catches in triple coverage lollosperros wrote:
The Vikings haven't been able to say that about any receiver since Cris Carter.
Well, actually, maybe about Rice during the 2009 season.
Who?Cliff wrote: Moss? That guy used to make catches in triple coverage lol
Cliff wrote: Moss? That guy used to make catches in triple coverage lol