Somebody has to sooner or later. All these fluff pieces...I wonder if people are just trolling.Eli wrote: Nice to see you post something informative.

Moderator: Moderators
Somebody has to sooner or later. All these fluff pieces...I wonder if people are just trolling.Eli wrote: Nice to see you post something informative.
When it comes to going deep, the Vikings are relying on a return to health by Jerome Simpson, plus raw first-round pick Cordarrelle Patterson and second-year pro Jarius Wright to give them what Bernard Berrian, Randy Moss, Devin Aromashodu, and a hobbled Simpson couldn't the past three years.
"We know that Cordarrelle can run by you. We know that Jerome can run by you," Frazier said. "We have some deep threats. Now, it's a matter of our being able to connect on some of those."
Coaches spent time in the offseason studying other teams' "go" balls, which were a particular point of frustration last season. Among other changes, receivers now have more freedom in how they release at the line of scrimmage, treating each situation as a one-on-one with a single assignment: Beat your man.
But it's up to Ponder, 25, to give them a chance.
And it's a work in progress.
Lol.Eli wrote: Nice to see you post something informative.
Why did you put the word team in quotes?indianation65 wrote:Sure, it will be great if the "team" delivers and Ponder pulls his weight, but should he lack in production, there is Cassel, and Cassel is a good quarterback.
I know right.smoothoperator wrote:cassel is a good quarterback?! when did this happen?
It happened a while ago.JEC334 wrote: I know right.
http://www.twincities.com/ci_22793636/t ... l-might-beThe Vikings found everything they were looking for and more in a backup quarterback. Maybe too much more.
Matt Cassel brings solid credentials to our humble tundra. He's had several outstanding seasons and still is just 30 years old.
I tried to look past that.80 PurplePride 84 wrote:I'm more concerned over the Cassel is a good Quarterback part.
More likely, judging by all the offseason comments, because something did NOT happen to Ponder. Because he didn't take that "next step", didn't transform himself from a caterpillar into a beautiful butterfly. Ponder getting hurt is that least of the Vikings' worries. That would be infinitely better than coming to the undeniable conclusion that Ponder is a bust and having to start all over again at QB.indianation65 wrote:I'm sure all Viking fans hope to "not" have to find out if Cassel can move the team down field, because if he plays, that means something happened to Ponder.
He actually had a strong season for the Chiefs in 2010 so it's not even as simple as saying he was good with the Pats and bad in KC. It's just that he hasn't been very good the last two years.indianation65 wrote:...good while a Patriot, terrible while a Chief, as stated before.
That's true and as backups go, he looks like a sound choice. He's definitely an NFL caliber quarterback.I'm sure all Viking fans hope to "not" have to find out if Cassel can move the team down field, because if he plays, that means something happened to Ponder. Those who constantly badmouth the Vikings backup quarterback are only looking to the Chiefs terrible "team" effort, of which he was a major part. You should hope that the good Patriot sparks shine if he gets on the field, instead of thinking/believing that he flat out sucks. He's an NFL caliber quarterback or else he wouldn't be on a team. Like any bench player in the NBA, there's a reason he's still in the NBA, and that's because he can play and has talent, (excluding Shawn Bradley).