Wow that sounds like many of the naysayers on this board
Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
Moderator: Moderators
-
Purple bruise
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
[quote="mansquatch"]Reusse is crotchety as ever. I swear the MN sports reporting scene is all about being critical of the franchise and complaining about everything they do. The only time the Vikings will ever be flawless is when they got 16-0 and win a super bowl. Until then the reporters will be eternally waiting for the chickens to come home to roost.
Wow that sounds like many of the naysayers on this board
Wow that sounds like many of the naysayers on this board
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
-
headless_norseman
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
We basically traded Harvin for Jennings and Patterson, and Winfield for Xavier. And to top it all of, we started out by getting Floyd. Good thing Reusse is a moron.
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.
-- Bud Grant
-- Bud Grant
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
Jeffbleedspurple wrote: mmmm!! Good trade
I agree. I actually think it was a good trade. Harvin should help Seattle and I think we got plenty of value in return, plus the Vikings WR corps may have gotten better in the process.
-
NextQuestion
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:43 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: Reusse: losing Harvin, Winfield, can't be Good
When he talks it sounds like someone is gargling
Pull yr 84 jerseys out.