
Packers, much like the Patriots, are going to be playoff contenders as long as they got their big money QB. Patriots without Brady? Yikes. Packers without Rodgers? My word...Harrell?
Moderator: Moderators
Very cool, as long as the Broncos win--more importantly (because it sounds better) that the Packers lose.RandallioCobb18 wrote:
Ha, oh man, I hate Tebow.
I like Peyton with the Broncos, how cool would An Aaron Rodgers vs Peyton Manning SB be?!![]()
![]()
I have a feeling you guys may not agree...
If we're so soft, then what does that make you? Not soft? We've beat you guys 6 out of the last 7 games, we also beat a pretty damn hard hitting, tough, Steelers team in the Super Bowl. Granted, that was in 2010 but I think it shows we are entirely capable of besting ANYBODY in the league when we are on our game, not that it always works out like that, we defiantly need to get tougher up front but that's what the draft is for .NextQuestion wrote:Make for a more interesting match up than Big Ben vs Rodgers. GB needs to get over that SF and NYG hump. GB is an incredibly soft team with a horrific defense. Does Dom Capers' haircut make him not make in game adjustments?
Packers, much like the Patriots, are going to be playoff contenders as long as they got their big money QB. Patriots without Brady? Yikes. Packers without Rodgers? My word...Harrell?
Jared Allen.RandallioCobb18 wrote:
So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time?
I never said free agent pick ups never worked out, I was saying that the teams that frequently pay for free agents rather then build there team through the draft dont win Championships, period.headless_norseman wrote: Jared Allen.
Jared Allen w/Minnesota Vikings:headless_norseman wrote: Jared Allen.
Code: Select all
2008 10-6 NFC North 1st 0-1 playoffs
2009 12-4 NFC North 1st 1-1 playoffs
2010 6-10 NFC North 4th -
2011 3-13 NFC North 4th -
2012 10-6 NFC North 2nd 0-1 playoffs
Total W/L: 42-42
GB had no answer for the Cardinals offense in the 2009 postseason either and no answer for the Giants offense in the 2011 playoffs. In their last 3 postseason losses, the Packers have allowed an average of about 44 points per game. Their defense came through for them in 2010 and they won it all but it's clear they have a problem.RandallioCobb18 wrote: If we're so soft, then what does that make you? Not soft? We've beat you guys 6 out of the last 7 games, we also beat a pretty damn hard hitting, tough, Steelers team in the Super Bowl. Granted, that was in 2010 but I think it shows we are entirely capable of besting ANYBODY in the league when we are on our game, not that it always works out like that, we defiantly need to get tougher up front but that's what the draft is for .
Capers is decent, albeit a bit stubborn, 2009-2010 we had a top defense, 2011 was our only real bad year, as last year we were 11th ranked scoring d in the league. We had no answer for Kapernick and the read option, I expect that to change.
I doubt anybody here is worried about who the Packers play in the postseason... unless it's the Vikings.You should probably focus getting over the hump against us, before worrying about who we see in the playoffs.
Read that again and tell me what's wrong with it.GB had no answer for the Cardinals offense in the 2009 postseason either and no answer for the Giants offense in the 2011 playoffs. In their last 3 postseason losses, the Packers have allowed an average of about 44 points per game. Their defense came through for them in 2009 and they won it all but it's clear they have a problen.
Oops!MelanieMFunk wrote: Read that again and tell me what's wrong with it.![]()
Ha. Here in an hour I'll be up for 24 hours. (I work overnights). I'm surprised I'm even functioning let alone catching mistakes.Mothman wrote: Oops!
LOL! Thanks for catching that, Melanie. I really shouldn't attempt tasks as complex as thinking and typing first thing in the morning.
I like Owens, but he just needs to let. it. go."I played my first early years in San Francisco with [Bears head coach Marc Trestman] and shortly after that, he left to do some things," Owens said. "I haven't talked to Marc in a long while. I know he's gone on and done some things, now he's back in the NFL. So, I never really thought about it until myself and Napoleon [Harris]were talking about it earlier, but I would definitely welcome it if they would give it some serious consideration. To think about [Bears wide receiver Brandon Marshall] on the other side and me on one side, that's really dangerous. I'm keeping myself in shape just for any opportunity that may come about."