Re: Breaking down the tape: Vikes-Seahawks
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:01 am
Very late, but I finally watched the game including all the 2nd half Vikings drives in coaches view.
Observations
The Vikings lost the 2nd half 10-3 and it was a one score game until well into the fourth quarter. The defense actually did a good job of ending Seahawks drives by stopping 3rd down conversions. The time of possession stat is misleading. The Vikings had 3 or 4 opportunities before it was a two score game.
The first drive of the 2nd half included a nice run by AD but also some cases where he was stopped. On a 2nd and 7, the Hawks did not blitz, Ponder had time in the pocket, Rudolph ran a short slant to the middle right in front of Ponder and was wide open. Ponder inexplicably tucked and ran. It was like he did not see Rudolph, frankly unbelievable.
On 3rd and 7 on the same drive, the Hawks blitzed over the right tackle. Loadholt whiffed on his guy and AD missed the blitz pickup completely despite being right there. There was another play earlier in the game where AD checked into a route and missed the blitz pickup completely. He is not progressing in that category, unfortunately. I still think they take AD out of the game too much on third down, they need his running as a threat on every down. But they rarely run him on third down even third and 5. Punt.
There were at least two other drives in the 2nd half where they were down one score. They ran a lot of short routes on these drives but did several things I do not understand schematically. On many pass plays there seemed to be a limited number of players running routes. On more than one pass play, they seemed to cluster their receivers routes in the same area of the field including two players running short crossing routes right to the middle of the field. It is not surprising receivers were covered. Other than the play mentioned above, I do not remember a single play where Rudolph was given an effective route to run. He seemed not even an available target on many of the pass plays.
The Vikings had their final drive with about 5 minutes left in the 4th quarter after the Hawks went up by 10. The philosophy changed completely on this drive. They tried long passes. On 2nd down Ponder overthrew his receiver on a deep route badly. On 3rd down he threw deep for Harvin and it was intercepted.
Final observations
This statement early that Ponder's goal was to complete most of his passes on first and second down has worked out like the Randy Ratio. All the teams have figured it out to the point he's throwing for very few yards and ironically at 50%.
Ponder seems to have no ability to recognize a blitz is coming and audible into a successful play. He also does not have the ability yet to stand in the pocket and look through his progression of receivers. He seems he's so scared to have INTs after last year that his ability to play QB in an effective manner has been suppressed.
People make fun of Musgrave with his tiny card with the plays. But it is a fair criticism. The Vikings offense lacks imagination. It is very vanilla and not surprising the team is struggling.
Ironically, the Vikes were very close in the Seattle game much of the way. They only put up 3 in the 2nd half after 17 in the first. That inconsistency must change today.
Go Vikes!!!!
Observations
The Vikings lost the 2nd half 10-3 and it was a one score game until well into the fourth quarter. The defense actually did a good job of ending Seahawks drives by stopping 3rd down conversions. The time of possession stat is misleading. The Vikings had 3 or 4 opportunities before it was a two score game.
The first drive of the 2nd half included a nice run by AD but also some cases where he was stopped. On a 2nd and 7, the Hawks did not blitz, Ponder had time in the pocket, Rudolph ran a short slant to the middle right in front of Ponder and was wide open. Ponder inexplicably tucked and ran. It was like he did not see Rudolph, frankly unbelievable.
On 3rd and 7 on the same drive, the Hawks blitzed over the right tackle. Loadholt whiffed on his guy and AD missed the blitz pickup completely despite being right there. There was another play earlier in the game where AD checked into a route and missed the blitz pickup completely. He is not progressing in that category, unfortunately. I still think they take AD out of the game too much on third down, they need his running as a threat on every down. But they rarely run him on third down even third and 5. Punt.
There were at least two other drives in the 2nd half where they were down one score. They ran a lot of short routes on these drives but did several things I do not understand schematically. On many pass plays there seemed to be a limited number of players running routes. On more than one pass play, they seemed to cluster their receivers routes in the same area of the field including two players running short crossing routes right to the middle of the field. It is not surprising receivers were covered. Other than the play mentioned above, I do not remember a single play where Rudolph was given an effective route to run. He seemed not even an available target on many of the pass plays.
The Vikings had their final drive with about 5 minutes left in the 4th quarter after the Hawks went up by 10. The philosophy changed completely on this drive. They tried long passes. On 2nd down Ponder overthrew his receiver on a deep route badly. On 3rd down he threw deep for Harvin and it was intercepted.
Final observations
This statement early that Ponder's goal was to complete most of his passes on first and second down has worked out like the Randy Ratio. All the teams have figured it out to the point he's throwing for very few yards and ironically at 50%.
Ponder seems to have no ability to recognize a blitz is coming and audible into a successful play. He also does not have the ability yet to stand in the pocket and look through his progression of receivers. He seems he's so scared to have INTs after last year that his ability to play QB in an effective manner has been suppressed.
People make fun of Musgrave with his tiny card with the plays. But it is a fair criticism. The Vikings offense lacks imagination. It is very vanilla and not surprising the team is struggling.
Ironically, the Vikes were very close in the Seattle game much of the way. They only put up 3 in the 2nd half after 17 in the first. That inconsistency must change today.
Go Vikes!!!!