Who's forcing you to watch?Hunter Morrow wrote:How can Joe Buck talk with Rodgers' nutsack in his mouth? I haven't heard ball washing this hardcore since every time Madden called a Favre game.
Joe Buck's announcing is basically gay pornography.
Packers = Saints
Moderator: Moderators
-
PurpleMustReign
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Packers = Saints
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
-
Hunter Morrow
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5692
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
- x 16
Re: Packers = Saints
I like the game other than that. I typically mute a game when one announcer loves a player so much that his commentary will be how much he loves that player.
I was only jokin'.
I was only jokin'.
-
PurpleMustReign
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Packers = Saints
I think they have called a good game.. There is the normal GB bias, but overall not too overly mushy.Hunter Morrow wrote:I like the game other than that. I typically mute a game when one announcer loves a player so much that his commentary will be how much he loves that player.
I was only jokin'.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
-
Hunter Morrow
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5692
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
- x 16
Re: Packers = Saints
Packers also totally got screwed on a call of a fumble on a kick return right?
-
hibbingviking
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7157
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:53 pm
- Location: bakersfield california
Re: Packers = Saints
excellent game 
ignore the records but every NFC team is competitive. half the AFC teams are awful.
ignore the records but every NFC team is competitive. half the AFC teams are awful.
Re: Packers = Saints
I think it's still too early to say but it depends on what you're talking about. I never bought the dynasty talk in the first place and I agree that their defense is questionable. I believed that going into the season. However, their best receiver (and Rodgers' favorite target) has been missing or hobbled all season and they opened against 3 of the league's current top 5 defenses (SF, Chicago and Seattle) so I think those factors have influenced their performance on offense. They have some problems, that's for sure, but with the talent they have, I think it's too early to completely rule them out as a contender. They definitely shouldn't be a favorite anymore and their offense isn't what it was a year or two ago but as much as I'd like to, I can't write them off after 5 games, especially when they should really be sitting at 3-2, not 2-3. They're 1-0 against the division, which helps them, but they're 2-2 in the conference, which could hurt them.GBFavreFan wrote:Was I right or was I right?
Hopefully, the Bears and Vikes will compete for the division (and the Vikes will win it) while GB and Detroit continue to struggle!
Jim