Page 9 of 19

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:51 pm
by tmscr
This will just set up rogers to continue his career afternoon. Wind knocked out looks like.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:51 pm
by Jordysghost
TSonn wrote: My bad, virtually worthless was aggressive. Sub 500 is probably accurate.

The 96 Packers had a record setting D and cruised to an easy SB win on the running game, D, and special teans, Favre was a regular season star but largely took a backseat in the playoffs in the cold of Lambeau, its pretty clear a lesser QB could probably have sufficed as long as he was solid.

The 2010 Packers D was ranked higher then the O and closed out 3 of the 4 playoff games, we almost beat the Patriots with Flynn that year, I dont think anything of what you said bears out in reality.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:52 pm
by Purple Reign
tmscr wrote:Any NFL fan who questions Sam bradfords toughness after this season needs their head examined. Absolutely tragic what he has to work with
I don't recall anyone questioning Bradford's toughness here.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:53 pm
by Dmizzle0
Jordysghost wrote:
The 96 Packers had a record setting D and cruised to an easy SB win on the running game, D, and special teans, Favre was a regular season star but largely took a backseat in the playoffs in the cold of Lambeau, its pretty clear a lesser QB could probably have sufficed as long as he was solid.

The 2010 Packers D was ranked higher then the O and closed out 3 of the 4 playoff games, we almost beat the Patriots with Flynn that year, I dont think anything of what you said bears out in reality.
Nobody cares.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:53 pm
by Jordysghost
Hope Rodgers is alright.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:53 pm
by tmscr
Purple Reign wrote: I don't recall anyone questioning Bradford's toughness here.
That's why I said NFL fan. That's the knock on him, that he's fragile.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:54 pm
by Jordysghost
Nobody cares.[/quote]

I just would imagine if one didnt want to be corrected they wouldnt say things that dont bear out.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:55 pm
by Jordysghost
Why the #### do we play that soft zone ####.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:55 pm
by purplehaze
Jordysghost wrote:Nobody cares.
I just would imagine if one didnt want to be corrected they wouldnt say things that dont bear out.[/quote]

What packer cheese board do you belong to? I am gonna join. Send me the link.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:55 pm
by Jordysghost
purplehaze wrote: I just would imagine if one didnt want to be corrected they wouldnt say things that dont bear out.
What packer cheese board do you belong to? I am gonna join. Send me the link.[/quote]

Raptorman has got you beat.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:56 pm
by Dmizzle0
Jordysghost wrote:Nobody cares.
I just would imagine if one didnt want to be corrected they wouldnt say things that dont bear out.[/quote]

Like I said, that belongs on a different thread.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:56 pm
by tmscr
The offensive line is the reason we will lose this game. Even with Nelson being ridiculous. Two turnovers and three penalties.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:57 pm
by Jordysghost
Dmizzle0 wrote: I just would imagine if one didnt want to be corrected they wouldnt say things that dont bear out.
Like I said, that belongs on a different thread.[/quote]

Point taken.

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 3:00 pm
by tmscr
lol clemmings justs tackles his man

Re: Vikes Packers game day thread

Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 3:01 pm
by TSonn
Jordysghost wrote: I just would imagine if one didnt want to be corrected they wouldnt say things that dont bear out.
Whatever man. I grew up in WI and had to watch the Packers every year. Favre was the MVP in 1996 so I think he was probably helpful for them that year. 2010 was a down year for Rodgers sure but 28/11 is still way better than Matt Flynn would have done.