Re: [Rumor] Kirk Cousins a Vikings for 27 million/year
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:40 pm
I'd be ok with Osweiler.
Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://vikingsmessageboard.com/
Geno Smith is not a good backup. Or a good QB for that matter. He holds a whopping 29:36 TD to INT ratio and has a career completion percentage of 57.9. That is as bad as it gets. I live in NY. I've seen this guy play many of times. He's terrible. I'll passYikesVikes wrote:Geno Smith please. A good back up.
Of the guys on the list, who is better?Pondering Her Percy wrote:Geno Smith is not a good backup. Or a good QB for that matter. He holds a whopping 29:36 TD to INT ratio and has a career completion percentage of 57.9. That is as bad as it gets. I live in NY. I've seen this guy play many of times. He's terrible. I'll passYikesVikes wrote:Geno Smith please. A good back up.
Matt Moore first of all. I would consider Gabbert. Why not just draft one? That’s what I want to do. Who says we need to sign one? It’s not like we have a rookie starter that needs a vet behind him. We have a veteran starter. So get a rookie to back him up. I’m sure he would be better than Geno Smith.YikesVikes wrote:Of the guys on the list, who is better?Pondering Her Percy wrote:Geno Smith is not a good backup. Or a good QB for that matter. He holds a whopping 29:36 TD to INT ratio and has a career completion percentage of 57.9. That is as bad as it gets. I live in NY. I've seen this guy play many of times. He's terrible. I'll passYikesVikes wrote:Geno Smith please. A good back up.
I hate that young And aren't given the time to develop. Here we have a young guy who had a bad rookie season. His sophomore season he improved and since then, he's been on the bench. Geno still has the ability to play and would be a good backup in my eyes. With the amount spent on QB1, we don't really have 10 million to throw at a QB2.
J. Kapp 11 wrote:Prior to Cousins, we were slated to be $67 million under the cap going into the 2019 season, when we'll need to re-sign Kendricks, Hunter, etc. I have every confidence that Spielman and Co. will work the numbers and sign who needs to be signed.Pondering Her Percy wrote:I dont see us losing Kendricks or Hunter as a sure thing. Remember there is a lot of money coming off of next years books with Robison along with others. Could be some surprise cuts like Rudy. Either way, this is more than doable to keep those guys. There was an article on exactly how we could do it.
We as a fanbase need to wake up to the fact that we have one of the better organizations in the NFL. The Wilfs have done everything imaginable to bring us facilities and players. Spielman had dealt shrewdly in the draft and the occasional free agent signing. Mike Zimmer has been tremendous -- 39 regular season wins in 4 years, having taken over for a rebuild. It speaks volumes that Kirk Cousins likely could have gotten $10 million more somewhere else but chose the Vikings.
Obviously we still don't have that pesky Lombardi trophy, so there's no way we can call ours "the best" organization or even elite. But in every other aspect, we're there. In my opinion, the future is bright for the Vikings.
IMO, the right guy to be a backup for this roster is an aged vet QB. The Shaun Hill type player. This roster is very strong, so they just need a guy who is going to come in on the cheap, make a few plays, and be a game manager while the starter recovers from whatever booboo he got.Maelstrom88 wrote:Yeah I think dome people think a good backip is anyone who has started a game in the NFL. But if they were horrible then just having experience doesn't make them someone you want starting on Sunday.
Sloter is no longer a rookie.YikesVikes wrote:A rookie backup would be a bad idea. It also flies against what this team typical does. Routinely we have a starter, a vet and a young development talent.