Vikings Message Board.Com

TSonn wrote:Not that it matters, but I want to see a replay of that Rodgers run to see how he juked Rhodes that bad. I suspect there's a hold or a block in the back on Nelson there which is why we haven't seen that angle.

My gosh dude, i wasnt complaining when Clay was tackled by neck by the O line so idk why you feel it nessecary to manufacture controversy.

purplehaze wrote: There should be a rule no packer fans allowed on this board. I don't get it.

Yea, clearly im the #### in this equation.

Jordysghost wrote: But really dude, grow up huh. I dont wish injury on your team.

Well, to be fair, we don't have a player that would change much if anyone got injured. The Packers have had 2 the past 20 years in Rodgers/Favre where if either went down, the team would be virtually worthless.

Jordysghost wrote: My gosh dude, i wasnt complaining when Clay was tackled by neck by the O line so idk why you feel it nessecary to manufacture controversy.

I think this is a Vikings board and I'm curious why we didn't see that replay. They show the crap out of Stafford juking defenders so why didn't they this time with Rodgers?

TSonn wrote: Well, to be fair, we don't have a player that would change much if anyone got injured. The Packers have had 2 the past 20 years in Rodgers/Favre where if either went down, the team would be virtually worthless.

The Packers had top 5 Ds the past two times they won the SB, including the number 1 ranked 1996 D that allowed an NFL record that still stands today with only 19 TDs alllowed.

Yea, worthless, but not though.

TSonn wrote: Well, to be fair, we don't have a player that would change much if anyone got injured. The Packers have had 2 the past 20 years in Rodgers/Favre where if either went down, the team would be virtually worthless.

So that justifies wanting to injure someone?

Jordysghost wrote: The Packers had top 5 Ds the past two times they won the SB, including the number 1 ranked 1996 D that allowed an NFL record that still stands today with only 19 TDs alllowed.

Yea, worthless, but not though.

Pretty big LOL if you think those Packer teams would have been in the playoffs, let alone the superbowl, without Favre or Rodgers those years.

Purple Reign wrote: So that justifies wanting to injure someone?

No, I'm just saying that opponents of the Vikings wouldn't really even have anyone to want to get injured because it wouldn't matter much. The Packers obviously do.

TSonn wrote: Pretty big LOL if you think those Packer teams would have been in the playoffs, let alone the superbowl, without Favre or Rodgers those years.

How many teams would be in the SB without their starting QB, big difference between that and "virtually worthless", but again, the numbers speak for themselves.

Jordysghost wrote:
How many teams would be in the SB without their starting QB, big difference between that and "virtually worthless", but again, the numbers speak for themselves.

My bad, virtually worthless was aggressive. Sub 500 is probably accurate.

I think the injury wishing folks and the packers fan should go to a different thread.

Rough start to the second half. We look defeated again. I guess it's tough to have confidence with Clemmings out there.

Any NFL fan who questions Sam bradfords toughness after this season needs their head examined. Absolutely tragic what he has to work with

tmscr wrote:Any NFL fan who questions Sam bradfords toughness after this season needs their head examined. Absolutely tragic what he has to work with

I agree!

Concussion protocol?