dead_poet wrote: Sure, but that's hardly a big commitment. What's the problem with taking a shot?
We only want future Hall of Famers. Duh.
Moderator: Moderators
dead_poet wrote: Sure, but that's hardly a big commitment. What's the problem with taking a shot?
Hopefully to #11.vatusay wrote:Soooooooooo how far does Randy Gregory slide......
Well ... if we are going to take flyers at OL, I'd rather we do it with players who have played the game at a higher level (and proven they can play against decent competition) and on players who are younger who we can develop (not someone who is 27 years old). This Polish guy played in the German Football League and the Polish Football League. That's it. I'm not even sure I'd put it at the low end of Div III. If you put someone who is 6-8 / 350 on the Macalester football team at OT (and assuming he's just reasonably athletic), he's probably going to overpower guys playing for Hamline, Carleton and the other schools in that division. Does it mean anything? Not really.dead_poet wrote: Sure, but that's hardly a big commitment. What's the problem with taking a shot?
No but none of my posts suggested that either so I'm not sure what you're getting at here.DK Sweets wrote:Pseudo Everything...has there been a post yet where people have claimed he was going to even be a starter?
Fusco (Slippery Rock) played in Div II and he was the cream of the crop as an All American first team. I'd say that Fusco played against considerably better competition than what the Polish behemoth saw in the GFL and PFL. Fusco was good enough to be drafted in the 6th round. If the Polish behemoth were in this year's draft I don't think he would have any chance at all at being drafted.It would have been easy to say the Fusco was nothing to be excited about coming out of Slippery Rock because he was playing against scrubs. We can't hold his competition against him if he played extremely well against them.
Of course you're not saying that. You're saying the opposite of that. I'm sorry if I worded that poorly.Pseudo Everything wrote: No but none of my posts suggested that either so I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
You're missing the point. Fusco ended up being better than a ton of players who were drafted before him, but he was held back because of who he played against. I'm not saying this guy is the next Fusco, I'm just saying there are possible parallels and there's no harm in seeing what he can do.Fusco (Slippery Rock) played in Div II and he was the cream of the crop as an All American first team. I'd say that Fusco played against considerably better competition than what the Polish behemoth saw in the GFL and PFL. Fusco was good enough to be drafted in the 6th round. If the Polish behemoth were in this year's draft I don't think he would have any chance at all at being drafted.
I agree that it's something to talk about. I thought that was what I was doing. It's a discussion ... not everyone has the same opinion. I wouldn't have signed the guy for the reasons I laid out (not going to re-hash all that). Just because I don't agree with something the Vikings front office did doesn't mean I'm upset (I'm not).DK Sweets wrote:Of course you're not saying that. You're saying the opposite of that. I'm sorry if I worded that poorly. I'm questioning why you seem to be upset with the signing/fan excitement. We're not that excited. It's the offseason; we've talked about everything from potential stadium-related bird deaths to Adrian Peterson riding a camel. An actual player with a fun video to watch is just something to talk about.Summary: You seem upset that fans are really excited about him and we're wasting a roster spot. We're not actually very excited and he's not guaranteed a roster spot by any means. Why does this move bother you?
I thought Fusco was drafted right about where he should have been. Same with Jim Kleinsasser who we drafted in the 2nd round and who played at then Div II North Dakota. The Polish behemoth played in what looks to me like a couple of glorified beer leagues. If there's a parallel between Fusco and the Polish dude, it's an extremely thin one. I'm pretty confident that there will be several undrafted OL free agents that will be better prospects than this guy. So if he's taking one of our 90 roster spots to the exclusion of someone who is a better prospect that would not be a good thing ... right?DK Sweets wrote:You're missing the point. Fusco ended up being better than a ton of players who were drafted before him, but he was held back because of who he played against. I'm not saying this guy is the next Fusco, I'm just saying there are possible parallels and there's no harm in seeing what he can do.