Unwatchable for the Sane

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

DanAS
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:29 am
x 1

Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by DanAS »

Maybe it's because she has been watching a lot of Stanford football lately and she is noticing what good football looks like. But my wife is really questioning my sanity in watching this team. Yes, the WRs are bad. Really, really bad. But at least we're trying all the WRs on the roster, aren't we? The truly amazing thing is that this QB is playing the position about as poorly as it can be played, and yet the Vikes' braintrust continues to put him out there. If I didn't know better, I'd think they were betting on the opposition.

Personally, I applaud their decision in playing Ponder given that they seem to be residents of the Twilight Zone. I want him to keep playing until finally, the brain trust loses patience. The idea of having to spend another season watching Ponder squander 200 yard performances by Adrian Peterson is unbearable. I feel like checking the U.S. Code when I get to work tomorrow to see if this is some kind of federal offense.

Why do they keep playing this guy? I honestly can't answer it. The only reason why I want him in there is to convince them to open their eyes. But what's their excuse? Pretty soon, even I will have had enough -- and surely, if there is another 210 yard rushing performance that results in 14 points, then I will have reached that point. But what fascinates me more than the depths to which Ponder will go is the decision making of the folks who run this team in continuing to throw him out there. Clearly, some of those guys either don't care or don't think. I'm still trying to figure out which it is.
CalVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3006
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:37 pm

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by CalVike »

The Vikings scored 0 points after AD's 82-yard TD run. Is that on Blair Walsh for missing a FG? Is that on WRs for not catching any passes until very late? Is that on the defense for allowing a 11:00 minute drive? Is that on AD for only delivering 210? The Coaches and/or GM are refusing accountability by refusing to bench Ponder.
thatguy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5188
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:25 pm
Location: Too far from MN...

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by thatguy »

CalVike wrote:The Vikings scored 0 points after AD's 82-yard TD run. Is that on Blair Walsh for missing a FG? Is that on WRs for not catching any passes until very late? Is that on the defense for allowing a 11:00 minute drive? Is that on AD for only delivering 210? The Coaches and/or GM are refusing accountability by refusing to bench Ponder.
That's on all of the above.
"The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it." ~Thucydides
CalVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3006
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:37 pm

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by CalVike »

Especially annoying. Bears lost today. Our Ponder driven team is 1-4 in past 5. IF we won today, we would be 7-5, one behind Bears playing them at home next week. Now we are 6-6 two down to GB and Chi. Lots of you say we suck and this post is pointless. But the reality is that stubbornly clinging to the Ponder reach through these sub-100 yard stretches has quite likely cost our team a playoff berth. It's just insane like Dan says in the OP.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by Eli »

Which announcer made the inevitable comment comparing Adrian Peterson's career with that of Barry Sanders? Year in and year out, playing like a madman on one of the most hopeless teams in the NFL. It has to take its toll on you emotionally.

I would not lose the tiniest bit of respect for Adrian Peterson if he demanded a trade away from these clowns and idiots. He deserves so much better.
admvp
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 509
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Tennessee

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by admvp »

Valhalla wrote:One has to be a fan through thick and thin. Somehow, the Vikings still put together 6 wins.... and who knows how we might do versus the Bears next week.
A solid point. This team is still 6-6. A .500 NFL football team. In the playoff picture.

Does anyone actually feel like we're a .500 football team? I know I don't. Does anyone actually feel like we have a chance to make the playoffs? I know I don't.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by Demi »

Why do they keep playing this guy?
Because the other options on the roster are worse. Isn't that a scary thought?
CalVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3006
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:37 pm

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by CalVike »

Demi wrote:Because the other options on the roster are worse. Isn't that a scary thought?
I guess it's one way to ensure an inadequate QB tops the depth chart. LOL.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by Demi »

GBFavreFan wrote: that's what unfair about this, like our other games, we still have a fair shot to win. If we had a QB that was at least "average" we'd have 7-9 wins right now. Something about how Ponder raising his hands in victory (since I know he will not be responsible for said victory) if the Vikings win more games that rubs me the wrong way.
Nah, some people would have you think Drew Brees would not only result in no more wins, but possibly more losses. :rofl:
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by Mothman »

DanAS wrote:Why do they keep playing this guy? I honestly can't answer it. The only reason why I want him in there is to convince them to open their eyes. But what's their excuse? Pretty soon, even I will have had enough -- and surely, if there is another 210 yard rushing performance that results in 14 points, then I will have reached that point. But what fascinates me more than the depths to which Ponder will go is the decision making of the folks who run this team in continuing to throw him out there. Clearly, some of those guys either don't care or don't think. I'm still trying to figure out which it is.
They're probably hoping he can play through adversity and come out the other side as a better QB but he's just prolonging the agony of watching him struggle week after week. We had a brief reprieve against the Lions but last week was rough and today was brutal.
User avatar
VikingPaul73
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm
x 141

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by VikingPaul73 »

At this point, might as well, keep playing the guy:

1. a 6-10 record should result in a decent pick
2. 4 more games of this nonsense should convince even the most stubborn Ponder supporters that we need to move on....


I still lament the cutting of Sage....we all know he wasn't the next Tom Brady, but I think we could easily be 8-4 right now with even a competent QB.
User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9602
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
x 24

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by soflavike »

VikingPaul73 wrote:At this point, might as well, keep playing the guy:

1. a 6-10 record should result in a decent pick
2. 4 more games of this nonsense should convince even the most stubborn Ponder supporters that we need to move on....


I still lament the cutting of Sage....we all know he wasn't the next Tom Brady, but I think we could easily be 8-4 right now with even a competent QB.
Sage? If he was so awesome, why is he unemployed right now?
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
beardedterror
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:41 am

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by beardedterror »

Eli wrote:I would not lose the tiniest bit of respect for Adrian Peterson if he demanded a trade away from these clowns and idiots.
I call BS x 20. While it's true that he does deserve better, and he's a once in a generation talent, I would guess there would be some hurt feelings if he left today. On top of that, we have to consider the fact that he fumbled away a chance at a super bowl in the 2009 NFCC game. We had our chance, and we blew it.
User avatar
JellyBean2144
Starter
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:03 pm

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by JellyBean2144 »

Rough game. But I will still watch my beloved Vikings, win or lose.
CalVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3006
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:37 pm

Re: Unwatchable for the Sane

Post by CalVike »

Sage? If he was so awesome, why is he unemployed right now?
Exactly. He's mediocre at best. I have no problem with cutting him. If he was our QB right now they'd be calling for Ponder or Webb or whoever by now.
Agreed. But even though I do not know who should be playing QB, I have seen more than enough to know Ponder should not.
Post Reply