Vikings Message Board.Com

Raptorman wrote: Well than so should Peterson. After all, it's his job to hold on to the ball when he is carrying it. Correct?

I'm honestly all for doing something about Peterson too. His fumblitis has been an issue ever since he entered the league even if he fixed it for a few years.

Actually, I take back what I said. Didn't know Locke was the one holding the ball for Walsh. Both of them should be gone. Hopefully we can find someone who can at least hit the short ones, and are decent long.

Either Walsh or our Holder needs to be gone by next Season. Don't get me wrong, I feel bad for them, but this is a Professional Sport and they get paid to make sure that Chip Shots like that are made.

We're dropping 49 points?

Not taking our foots off their throats.... this is a new look, I like it!

Oh the Vikings are playing well in a Primtime game? Let's bring up one of the worst No-Calls in History, that screwed over the Vikings. Logic.

I'm telling you guys, if we can fix our O-Line and simply build around the Team we have now. We're going to be a scary team for at least a good 3-4 years, maybe more than that. I personally think TB is fine, just needs to find Chemistry with his Wideouts. Would be nice if we could grab a 'Calvin Joh...

I'm pretty sure that the Giants cannot blame all of this on Odell Beckham Jr. Mostly because Manning is playing like utter garbage tonight, but also that their Defense just doesn't want to be there.

I had a feeling when I saw that originally, the game was going to be at 1 pm my time... that if we win tonight they'd make it the Sunday Night Game. Well. If we can beat the Pack in their own house, on Sunday Night, I don't want to hear anymore about Primetime woes. Let's win the NFC North!

Alright then. Thanks for the great Field position Coughlin.

What the heck was that Sendejo? Come on dude, you have to at least tackle. Pathetic.

Really Walsh... you confuse me so much. You miss an extra point, but make a 52 yd and 53 yd FG.

Once the 4th starts, we should start pulling starters.

You don't change what one of the best RBs has been doing all his career. There is a reason he starts back there. I understand fully why it's done, but we don't have the Offensive Line like we used to. I think AD starting so far back behind the QB is a mistake with this line Took the words right out...

Does Peterson have to start, so far back? I mean if we could get him just a few yards closer he'd probably be busting loose.

SKOL AD!!!

Walsh can kick a 52 yd FG but misses an Extra Point? I don't get the dude at all.