Vikings Message Board.Com

This franchise is snake bit.

See, I don't get that take. You'd rather pay 7 million, and he played poorly enough to not earn incentives? Explain it to me. :)

I want him to play great and earn every incentive, but I want the contract designed so were less likely to have to pay the extra 3 Million. For example I prefer ...

When you are not considered a contender, getting a non-stiff vet FA towards the end of their career to sign is difficult - they'd love to go out with a winner. So the bolded above was more directed towards we are lucky we signed the guy rather than why sign the guy in the first place.

I ...

I also think Sam Darnold will surprise some people, so I believe it will be next season.

I'll just say... 100 million guaranteed. If he's upset, he'll wipe his tears away with that money..

I'll get laughed off the board...but are there any decent looking place kickers to be had in this draft? Joseph is gone. I'd like to have a kicker that's consistent from 45 yards & in & doesn't miss multiple PATs during the course of the season.


For the Vikings? I don't think it's possible to ...

makila wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:34 pm Nix to DEN. Six qbs gone in top 12 picks.

It's crazy!

People ragging on Kwesi for this need to just stop. There was a ton of speculation that the Vikings would trade away 11, 23 and a first next year to take McCarthy at either 4 or 5. To get him at 10 and keep 23? That's good work.


Agreed, I like it.


Yes, me too. We honestly didn't give up ...

allday1991 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 2:01 pm 4 years 180 million, 50 million signing bonus, 100 million guaranteed. Way way to much.

Remember, with Kirk, it's not about the $$$ /s


I don't really blame the guy, but don't say one thing, and do the other...

As an aside to this, I wonder why teams that don't have a clear-cut starter don't switch QBs out more in game. Not as a punishment for not playing well but as an actual strategy. QB by committee where you rotate them in based on their strengths for a given play.

I've wondered the same thing at ...

makila wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 4:09 pm

makila wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 12:39 pm **Edit: The full article was a bit long and taking up a lot of the page so I snipped it and added the link. -Cliff

Ahh sorry Cliff. Didn't think everyone could read via link, thought it was behind their paywall.

It is, and I can't

VikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:11 am IMO losing Hicks is a big loss. How many lost players can we keep on going next man up with? JJ, Kirk, Hicks......

I agree, the team sure seems to be bitten by the injury bug this year.

VikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 2:50 pm

VikingLord wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 9:43 am

If they keep winning I'm going to have to pick them eventually...

NO!!! You have to pick us to lose every game and give up 30 or more points every game.

Please oh great VikingLord.. It's all in your capable fingers.

Crax wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2023 4:28 pm Rumors of torn achilles for Akers. Going to be seeing even more Mattison now. May get more chandler at least

Oh, man... The hits keep on coming.

The Vikings defense politely said "Shove It" to your prediction. :govikes: :lol:


I wasn't able to watch the game, but the stat line looked pretty ugly (and not in favor of the Vikings):

First downs
- Bears 18
- Vikings 12

Total plays
- Bears 65
- Vikings 55

Total yards
- Bears 275 ...