5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterson
Moderator: Moderators
5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterson
http://www.startribune.com/vikings-must ... 377799611/
Vikings picked up the 5th year options for Floyd and Rhodes today, but did not do so on Patterson
Vikings picked up the 5th year options for Floyd and Rhodes today, but did not do so on Patterson
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
I think they trade him for something between a 4th and a 6th to an AFC team.Crax wrote:http://www.startribune.com/vikings-must ... 377799611/
Vikings picked up the 5th year options for Floyd and Rhodes today, but did not do so on Patterson
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-
- Backup
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:17 pm
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
Sad that he never turned out to be consistent WR. But let's be honest , he is an amazing kick returner and soon to be punt returner. He is one of the best returners we have had. Hopefully we can keep him on a small contract when he is up.
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
I doubt that's going to happen. If he doesn't have a bigger role as a WR this year than the miniscule role he had last year, I'd say he's a lock to seek a contract elsewhere in free agency and under those circumstances, the Vikings will probably be fine with his departure.AlldayPotter wrote:Sad that he never turned out to be consistent WR. But let's be honest , he is an amazing kick returner and soon to be punt returner. He is one of the best returners we have had. Hopefully we can keep him on a small contract when he is up.
All of that assumes he'll actually be on the roster this season, of course. He could be traded or cut.
It would be interesting to see what a team like Pittsburgh could do with Patterson.
I wonder if Oakland would be interested since Musgrave worked with him in 2013.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
Pittsburgh would be a great destination for Patterson. Reuniting him with Musgrave isn't a bad idea either. I think if he doesn't position himself for a larger role than he had last year, its time to trade him and recoup a little value.Mothman wrote: I doubt that's going to happen. If he doesn't have a bigger role as a WR this year than the miniscule role he had last year, I'd say he's a lock to seek a contract elsewhere in free agency and under those circumstances, the Vikings will probably be fine with his departure.
All of that assumes he'll actually be on the roster this season, of course. He could be traded or cut.
It would be interesting to see what a team like Pittsburgh could do with Patterson.
I wonder if Oakland would be interested since Musgrave worked with him in 2013.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
I think Musgrave would jump at the chance to have Patterson on the Raiders. He knows what CP is like with the ball in his hands, plus he helps any team's return game. Pittsburgh is a good idea as well. I wouldn't mind seeing what the Pats could do with Patterson either. Of course, I wouldn't mind seeing what the Vikings could do with Patterson, if only he could get the opportunities during regular season football.Mothman wrote: I doubt that's going to happen. If he doesn't have a bigger role as a WR this year than the miniscule role he had last year, I'd say he's a lock to seek a contract elsewhere in free agency and under those circumstances, the Vikings will probably be fine with his departure.
All of that assumes he'll actually be on the roster this season, of course. He could be traded or cut.
It would be interesting to see what a team like Pittsburgh could do with Patterson.
I wonder if Oakland would be interested since Musgrave worked with him in 2013.
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
It's really going to be up to the coaches. He's certainly appears to be doing what he can to improve this offseason.losperros wrote:I think Musgrave would jump at the chance to have Patterson on the Raiders. He knows what CP is like with the ball in his hands, plus he helps any team's return game. Pittsburgh is a good idea as well. I wouldn't mind seeing what the Pats could do with Patterson either. Of course, I wouldn't mind seeing what the Vikings could do with Patterson, if only he could get the opportunities during regular season football.
The Pats offensive system could present a big learning curve for him because it's very different than what he's seen so far but I imagine they'd figure out ways to get the ball in his hands and I suspect the Raiders and Steelers would too.
The Vikes just don't seem very interested and Patterson needs to play for a coaching staff that's flexible enough to make use of his gifts.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:02 am
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
I think the Raiders would be the ideal landing spot for him.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3836
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
- Location: Coon Rapids, MN
- x 117
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
This has all the hallmarks of a guy who gets tossed and then becomes a superstar elsewhere. I hope I'm wrong
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
I usually don't hope for someone to be wrong but I hope you are squatch......mansquatch wrote:This has all the hallmarks of a guy who gets tossed and then becomes a superstar elsewhere. I hope I'm wrong
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
How many times does that happen? From my (albeit flawed) recollection it's exceedingly rare.mansquatch wrote:This has all the hallmarks of a guy who gets tossed and then becomes a superstar elsewhere. I hope I'm wrong
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
I'm somewhat hopeful that not picking up his option will have him more focused to learn the mundane aspects of the WR position. If not, he may not get much of a contract from anyone next year. Regardless, it seems unlikely that Patterson will get to showcase any new WR skills he's gained this year since he will most likely be behind Diggs, Wright, Treadwell, and Johnson on the depth chart.
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
Pretty much how I saw it going myself, Rhodes and Floyd are definitely worth keeping and now that we have MoBo there isn't much point in extending Patterson. MoBo may be able to actually learn an NFL offense and how to run a proper route though, seems like a smart dude, speaks multiple languages, forms coherent sentences in interviews, etc.
Hopefully someone is willing to bite on a 4th / 5th rounder to get Patterson from us. With touch backs going to the 25 I think it is? His value to us is extremely low now, I'd be okay if they cut him to keep a guy like Theilan on the team.
Hopefully someone is willing to bite on a 4th / 5th rounder to get Patterson from us. With touch backs going to the 25 I think it is? His value to us is extremely low now, I'd be okay if they cut him to keep a guy like Theilan on the team.
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: 5th year options exercised on Floyd,Rhodes, not Patterso
It really is sad about CP, but the writting has been on the wall. Maybe they got Der German to replace him on KO's.