maembe wrote:
-The team has scored more points with Ponder in
This is true. Removing all the Punt/Kick Returns from the scores reveals:
Ponder's Offense - 24.5 ppg
Cassel's Offense - 22.0 ppg
(Less than a FG difference between the two)
-Ponder has a higher QBR
That may be true of the QBR but it is not true of the Passer Rating (still the most widely accepted stat). The QBR has several flaws, not the least od which is ESPNs "close hold" on exactly how it is calculated (which means others cannot check it's accuracy, we just have to take "ESPN's word" for it. The Total QBR system gave the Denver Broncos' Tim Tebow a higher rating than the Green Bay Packers' Aaron Rodgers in their respective Week 5 contests in 2011. Noting that Rodgers completed 26 of 39 passes for 396 yards and two touchdowns in a win over the Atlanta Falcons, while Tebow completed four of 10 passes for 79 yards and a touchdown, and six rushes for 38 yards and a touchdown, in a loss to the San Diego Chargers, Mike Florio of Profootballtalk.com wrote that he'll "continue to ignore ESPN’s Total QBR stat."
As far as Passer Ratings go:
Ponder
Career - 76.3
This Season - 72.5
Cassel
Career - 80.8
This Season - 92.0
-Cassel's stats make him look better than he actually played, and they don't look that good to begin with
This is exactly the same critique that Is given to Ponder. That is also a subjective evaluation. When measuring objectively (forgetting whether or not Ponder is "padding his stats in garbage time" or Cassel "stats look better than he actually played"), Cassel gets the nod.
-You might be right him being the worst starting QB in the NFL, but only because Cassel isn't starting.
We'll have to disagree on this point. I don't think Cassel is a significant upgrade over Ponder, but in terms of what I want a QB to do (pass the ball), he is more decisive, has better pocket awareness, and throws the ball more accurately on 10+ routes. Ponder can run better, but that's not what I really want the strong point of my QB to be.