Lions-Packers TNF

Craws84 · Post by **Craws84** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Skoltastic_Voyage wrote: Wonder why... Favre into Rodgers and a million wins later...

Exactly

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Post by **S197** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:52 pm

All I have to say is I'm pretty damn happy we already played the Lions twice this year.

Hunter Morrow · Post by **Hunter Morrow** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:54 pm

S197 wrote:All I have to say is I'm pretty damn happy we already played the Lions twice this year.

First they make Philly look abysmal, now they are gonna win I think a three or four score romp on the Packers.

We definitely played them at the right time.

Funkytown · Post by **Funkytown** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:56 pm

Lions just snapped a Packers streak of 56 straight games of not being shut out in the first half.

Jordysghost · Post by **Jordysghost** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:06 pm

Packers, oh Packers, whereart thou my Packers?

Jordysghost · Post by **Jordysghost** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:07 pm

Why the #### did your corners suck bad enough to give me false hope in the validity of our WRs? Why Vikings?????

Skoltastic_Voyage · Post by **Skoltastic_Voyage** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:09 pm

Jordysghost wrote:Packers, oh Packers, whereart thou my Packers?

At a "bear" club.

oh and the line is "Wherefore art thou Romeo". Which actually mean why. As in "why are you Romeo" meaning "Why did you have to be a Montague?”

'Cause learning.

Jordysghost · Post by **Jordysghost** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:10 pm

Tis the crulest of humor.

Funkytown · Post by **Funkytown** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:10 pm

Jordysghost wrote:Why the #### did your corners suck bad enough to give me false hope in the validity of our WRs? Why Vikings?????

The Vikings always forget how to play when they play the Packers. We hate it, too.

PurpleKoolaid · Post by **PurpleKoolaid** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:10 pm

Jordysghost wrote: So i can pretty much assume no matter what happens or what gets called you are just going to claim the Packers have referential bias until the end of time?

They have till now, why would you think anything would stop? Their baby was Favre (and Maddens greatest joy in life) and when Rogers started, the Refs showed it was business as usual.

fiestavike · Post by **fiestavike** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:10 pm

bad PI calls, benefiting GB on both sides of the ball...but Rodgers shouldn't have been called for grounding.

Jordysghost · Post by **Jordysghost** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:10 pm

Skoltastic_Voyage wrote: At a "bear" club.

At least those guys have some passion.

Hunter Morrow · Post by **Hunter Morrow** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:11 pm

Jordysghost wrote:Why the #### did your corners suck bad enough to give me false hope in the validity of our WRs? Why Vikings?????

Sendintheclowns is a job saver. That and if our front 4 doesn't get pressure (which happens with distressing regularity), we give teams an eternity to pass on our crummier secondary guys.

Jordysghost · Post by **Jordysghost** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:11 pm

fiestavike wrote:bad PI calls, benefiting GB on both sides of the ball...but Rodgers shouldn't have been called for grounding.

The second pi was the right call.

Funkytown · Post by **Funkytown** » Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:13 pm

Jordysghost wrote:Why the #### did your corners suck bad enough to give me false hope in the validity of our WRs? Why Vikings?????

Here, you might like this: Breakdown: Rodgers vs Vikings

Vikings Message Board.Com

Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Re: Lions-Packers TNF