Bradford Could Return (?)

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24445
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by dead_poet » Sat Dec 30, 2017 5:56 pm

DK Sweets wrote: I can't speak to his workouts or work ethic obviously, but I feel like if you look at his legs they are thinner than the other guys you mentioned. He's always had a weird body type/gait in my opinion, so even if it hs nothing to do with his effort, I think the gangliness (I made that word up) is there.
Really? Put the legs of Ryan, Flacco, Bradford, Rodgers, Brady, Cousins, etc. (basically any QB not named Cam Newton) and I'd have no flippin' clue. Upper body, sure. Not legs. At least not me. I'm not that observant apparently.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly

WadeWilson
Practice Squad
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 9:15 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by WadeWilson » Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:19 pm

soflavike wrote:If Keenum is hurt in a playoff game and we need a score, a healthy Bradford is an easy choice over a rusty Bridgewater
Not sure if I could agree with that. He is a sitting duck in the pocket and every defense he would face is going to be pretty good, and our line is not going to be at full strength. The last game he was cleared to start was a disaster until he got pulled.

I think I would take the rusty qb that can move and not take so many sacks.

User avatar
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6908
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by J. Kapp 11 » Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:06 pm

WadeWilson wrote: Not sure if I could agree with that. He is a sitting duck in the pocket and every defense he would face is going to be pretty good, and our line is not going to be at full strength. The last game he was cleared to start was a disaster until he got pulled.

I think I would take the rusty qb that can move and not take so many sacks.
How do you know Teddy can move?

Not making an argument either way. But Bridgewater has taken 5 snaps in two years. I won't make a judgment based on those 5 snaps because it wouldn't be fair to Teddy, but I think it's fair to say that we have no idea what his mobility is like.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.

User avatar
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by 808vikingsfan » Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:15 pm

J. Kapp 11 wrote: How do you know Teddy can move?

Not making an argument either way. But Bridgewater has taken 5 snaps in two years. I won't make a judgment based on those 5 snaps because it wouldn't be fair to Teddy, but I think it's fair to say that we have no idea what his mobility is like.
Well, from what we all have seen so far, Teddy can drop back, Bradford can't.
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014

User avatar
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6908
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by J. Kapp 11 » Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:46 pm

808vikingsfan wrote:Well, from what we all have seen so far, Teddy can drop back, Bradford can't.
You don't know that. Heck, Zimmer doesn't even know that. He hasn't seen Sam practice. It's been 3 months since Bradford was on the field. Neither you nor I know what he's capable of right now.

And from what I saw, Teddy didn't look particularly mobile in his short stint. Again, that may be unfair, given that he only got 5 snaps.

It's weird to say, but if Case Keenum goes down, we're likely screwed.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.

User avatar
808vikingsfan
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by 808vikingsfan » Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:51 pm

J. Kapp 11 wrote:Heck, Neither you nor I know what he's capable of right now.
Exactly. We can only go by what we've seen in game. The last we've seen, Teddy could drop back fine, Bradford could hardly walk without limping. That's all we can go by until we see otherwise.
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014

User avatar
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 18383
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
Contact:

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by PurpleMustReign » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:54 am

For Teddy and Sam at this point, with what we know, it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. It's impossible to say if Teddy can move or even throw the ball accurately downfield consistently. Pretty much the same with Sam but I am guessing he can still throw the ball fairly accurate if his knees are strong enough.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬

User avatar
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24445
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by dead_poet » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:23 am

PurpleMustReign wrote:For Teddy and Sam at this point, with what we know, it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. It's impossible to say if Teddy can move or even throw the ball accurately downfield consistently. Pretty much the same with Sam but I am guessing he can still throw the ball fairly accurate if his knees are strong enough.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
Pretty sure the Vikings wouldn't activate much less put Teddy on the field if they didn't think he could throw the ball downfield (consistently).

From his one scramble, he looked like he was moving fine.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly

User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9526
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by soflavike » Tue Jan 02, 2018 2:57 pm

Have to evaluate Bradford in practice. If he's able to move around in the pocket and step into his throws, I think he's a better backup option than Teddy. Don't hate me for saying it, I like Teddy, but I don't have any confidence he can take a hit or throw the ball as well as Bradford can (I don't think he ever did).
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida

User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9526
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by soflavike » Tue Jan 02, 2018 2:59 pm

dead_poet wrote:Pretty sure the Vikings wouldn't activate much less put Teddy on the field if they didn't think he could throw the ball downfield (consistently).
Oh, I don't know about that now... they've activated plenty of QBs who couldn't throw downfield consistently. :lol:
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida

User avatar
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24445
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by dead_poet » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:08 pm

soflavike wrote: Oh, I don't know about that now... they've activated plenty of QBs who couldn't throw downfield consistently. :lol:
Ha!

Sam could do it, but he needed to be in a lawn chair first.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly

User avatar
TSonn
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by TSonn » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:14 pm

He's baaaaack!

https://twitter.com/VikingUpdate/status ... 5497140224

Looks way more like week 1 knees than week 5 knees. I like what Keenum brings in terms of escapability (which I think will be absolutely necessary in the playoffs) but I would definitely put Bradford above Bridgewater on the depth chart. I love rooting for Teddy but needing to throw him in a playoff game for his first meaningful minutes in 2 years is a nightmare. Starting today, Bradford will have as much practice time prior to our divisional round game as he did to prepare for his dismantling of GB last year week 2. Plus, he already knows the playbook and the WR/RBs.

Hopefully we don't have to find out what happens if Case goes down, but if he does, I think we still keep on winning Bradford - maybe not with Bridgewater.

User avatar
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6908
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by J. Kapp 11 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:47 pm

dead_poet wrote: Pretty sure the Vikings wouldn't activate much less put Teddy on the field if they didn't think he could throw the ball downfield (consistently).

From his one scramble, he looked like he was moving fine.
I've refrained from evaluating Teddy's limited performance because I think it would be unfair. But since you brought it up, I thought he looked tentative. That's just my observation, and reasonable people can disagree on things like this.

Here's the issue for me: I think the coaching staff missed a huge opportunity in the Cincy game.

Not only did they only get Teddy 5 snaps, they were also ultra-conservative when they did play him. Teddy needed real reps, not just a nice welcome back and a standing ovation.

I didn't think they should play him in any games they could lose. But they had ample opportunity against Cincinnati. That was the most one-sided game the Vikings have had in a long time. They should have played Teddy at least a full quarter, and gotten him a minimum of 8-10 pass attempts. I don't care if you're up 30. Break the stupid coach's code. Marvin Lewis would have understood. Teddy needed the reps in the passing game.

He's our No. 2, one twisted ankle from holding the keys to the Ferarri. It would be incredibly unfair to expect him to drive it flawlessly in a playoff game. But that's now the situation we're in. Either that, or chance that the duct tape and bailing wire holding Sam's knee together won't blow apart.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.

User avatar
Purple Domination
Transition Player
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by Purple Domination » Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:48 pm

TSonn wrote:He's baaaaack!

https://twitter.com/VikingUpdate/status ... 5497140224

Looks way more like week 1 knees than week 5 knees. I like what Keenum brings in terms of escapability (which I think will be absolutely necessary in the playoffs) but I would definitely put Bradford above Bridgewater on the depth chart. I love rooting for Teddy but needing to throw him in a playoff game for his first meaningful minutes in 2 years is a nightmare. Starting today, Bradford will have as much practice time prior to our divisional round game as he did to prepare for his dismantling of GB last year week 2. Plus, he already knows the playbook and the WR/RBs.

Hopefully we don't have to find out what happens if Case goes down, but if he does, I think we still keep on winning Bradford - maybe not with Bridgewater.
Looks like he's planting well! If the coaches like what they see, I'd definitely make him the back up for our playoff run.

It will be an interesting off season for Sam. Can you imagine the pins and needles we'd be sitting on if we bring him back as our starter? We'd be waiting every game for him to get injured again. For this reason (same applies to Teddy) I'd like to see us bring back Case and draft a young QB.

User avatar
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24445
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by dead_poet » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:11 pm

Purple Domination wrote: Looks like he's planting well! If the coaches like what they see, I'd definitely make him the back up for our playoff run.

It will be an interesting off season for Sam. Can you imagine the pins and needles we'd be sitting on if we bring him back as our starter? We'd be waiting every game for him to get injured again. For this reason (same applies to Teddy) I'd like to see us bring back Case and draft a young QB.
Sam to Arizona makes some sense. Or did before Arians left anyway.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly

User avatar
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2360
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by PacificNorseWest » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:25 pm

dead_poet wrote: Sam to Arizona makes some sense. Or did before Arians left anyway.
Agree with this. And if Fitz retires, I doubt he'd elect to sign there.

He might find his way to DC next season now though.

User avatar
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24445
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by dead_poet » Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:44 pm

PacificNorseWest wrote:He might find his way to DC next season now though.
That would be interesting. I suppose his injury history would make him cheaper than Cousins. But I could see Washington fans freaking out over signing an older injury-risk that's about the same talent-level as a guy they let walk. Honestly, I think it's a little odd they put themselves in that position. And this coming from a guy whose QB situation is one of the screwiest in recent memory.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly

User avatar
halfgiz
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1766
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by halfgiz » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:44 pm

ProFootballTalk
@ProFootballTalk
5h
Carson Palmer announces his retirement wp.me/p14QSB-av94
View summary ·

User avatar
TeamChaplain
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Miller, SD

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by TeamChaplain » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:37 am

A report just came out in 247 sports that the Vikes plan to dress Bradford for Sunday's game. If Bradford is activated and the Vikes want to protect Sloter from waivers, do you think they would release?
From the Fjords of ValHalla

autobon7
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by autobon7 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:04 pm

TeamChaplain wrote:A report just came out in 247 sports that the Vikes plan to dress Bradford for Sunday's game. If Bradford is activated and the Vikes want to protect Sloter from waivers, do you think they would release?
Thats a good question that I'm not sure what the answer is. Coley maybe?

User avatar
TeamChaplain
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Miller, SD

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by TeamChaplain » Fri Jan 12, 2018 4:53 pm

autobon7 wrote: Thats a good question that I'm not sure what the answer is. Coley maybe?
Honestly, I was thinking Floyd.
From the Fjords of ValHalla

User avatar
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 18383
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
Contact:

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by PurpleMustReign » Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:21 pm

TeamChaplain wrote: Honestly, I was thinking Floyd.
I don't think they will cut Floyd because he has Super Bowl experience. I wouldn't pass out from shock if they did but I don't see it happening. Coley makes much more sense.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬

User avatar
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2360
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by PacificNorseWest » Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:41 pm

I think he means Sharrif? And I damn near forgot all about him...What a waste.


I wish they expanded rosters like they do for MLB Postseason. :lol:

Edit: Nevermind...That wouldn't make any sense because he's already on IR...so yeah...Michael.

User avatar
TeamChaplain
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Miller, SD

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by TeamChaplain » Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:54 pm

PacificNorseWest wrote:I think he means Sharrif? And I damn near forgot all about him...What a waste.


I wish they expanded rosters like they do for MLB Postseason. :lol:

Edit: Nevermind...That wouldn't make any sense because he's already on IR...so yeah...Michael.
Two reasons why I was thinking Michael Floyd. His production is way down even when he gets on the field and Coley can flat out ball. He worked hard and earned himself a spot. He is young talent that they would be wise to hold on to.
From the Fjords of ValHalla

User avatar
PurplePeopleEater
Transition Player
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: MN

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by PurplePeopleEater » Fri Jan 12, 2018 6:25 pm

100% Keenum as the starter against NO, god willing he will dominate from the beginning. If things do go south early though I think Zimmer should keep Bradford in his back pocket Saban style. May be a nice change of pace.
And the former Bear will go 99 yards

User avatar
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2360
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by PacificNorseWest » Fri Jan 12, 2018 6:26 pm

I think Floyd would be valuable though if someone like Diggs or Thielen got hurt. It really makes no sense to carry 4 QB's into the postseason, but with no QB signed for next season, waiving someone like Sloter is risky he's potentially the Vikings backup next season.

I don't know. Tough predicament.

User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9526
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by soflavike » Sat Jan 13, 2018 8:46 pm

Well, they released Kyle Carter, the TE... going with only two TE's... a little risky.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida

autobon7
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Post by autobon7 » Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:49 pm

soflavike wrote:Well, they released Kyle Carter, the TE... going with only two TE's... a little risky.
I kinda liked what I seen in Carter even though it was limited. Must feel pretty good with Rudolphs ankle or foot or whatever it was. Seems a little risky to me.

Post Reply