View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Apr 26, 2018 10:10 am



Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would... 

If Teddy Bridgewater was 100% healthy and put in as starting QB week 2 rather than Case Keenum...
Teddy would have played better than Case Keenum thus far and the Vikings might have more wins than they do right now 17%  17%  [ 6 ]
Teddy would have played below Case Keenum's level thus far and the Vikings might have fewer wins that they do right now 50%  50%  [ 18 ]
Teddy would have played at a similar level to Case Keenum thus far and the Vikings would have a similar number of wins 19%  19%  [ 7 ]
Comedy option 14%  14%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 36

 If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would... 
Author Message
Pro Bowl Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 603
Post If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would...
x


Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:40 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37360
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Here's a comedy option:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201509140 ... tab=videos


Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:07 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 8334
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Boy thats funny. Nothing like kicking a man while hes down.


Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:40 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37360
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
Boy thats funny. Nothing like kicking a man while hes down.


Lighten up. It's just a funny "blooper reel" play! You know, comedy, like the poll said.

Plus, Teddy Bridgewater isn't exactly "down" at the moment. He's recovered from his injuries and will get a chance to play again sooner or later.


Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:36 pm
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 603
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Mothman wrote:

:tongue:


Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:57 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 8334
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Mothman wrote:
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
Boy thats funny. Nothing like kicking a man while hes down.


Lighten up. It's just a funny "blooper reel" play! You know, comedy, like the poll said.

Plus, Teddy Bridgewater isn't exactly "down" at the moment. He's recovered from his injuries and will get a chance to play again sooner or later.


But he did lose his starting job. And was told repeatedly by Zimmer he would start this year. And its doubtful he will, because Case is doing so well. But I consider Teddy being down yet. I guess I just didnt find it funny, but to each their own.


Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:25 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm
Posts: 6093
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
But he did lose his starting job. And was told repeatedly by Zimmer he would start this year. And its doubtful he will, because Case is doing so well. But I consider Teddy being down yet. I guess I just didnt find it funny, but to each their own.


I'm not convinced he's lost it (the starting job) yet. He's come back from a terrible injury and it's wise that the Vikings are cautious with making changes. I want Teddy to succeed, but I'm just not sure what (if any) lasting effects will occur because of the injury. Also with Case doing so well, there is absolutely no need to rush the switch. So why would Zimmer? Lastly, the season is not over yet. We still may see Teddy under center before we are done...

_________________
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!


Sun Dec 10, 2017 2:52 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Posts: 9526
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
It's not like Teddy had taken us to a couple of Super Bowls before he damaged his knee. The jury was still out on him. He showed questionable arm strength and accuracy downfield, average accuracy in the short game, decent mobility, good leadership... a mixed bag. Yes, there was a lot of potential there, but the knee injury was pretty devastating and he might have durability problems moving forward. He has yet to take a single hit since the injury. I'm not saying he's finished, but he's got a lot of ground to gain back before he can move forward.

We would probably be a .500 team with Teddy at the helm this season.

_________________
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida


Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:23 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1751
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
These are Teddy's Touchdown numbers in 2015.

Games

1. 0
2. 1
3. O 1 int
4. 1
5. 1 2 int
6. 2
7. 1 1 int
8. 0 1int
9. 1
10. 1
11. 1
12. 0 1int
13 0 1 int
14. 1
15. 4
16. 1
17.0 1int

8 fumbles

How long would have Case played this year with numbers like that.


Mon Dec 11, 2017 5:43 pm
Profile
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 24352
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
halfgiz wrote:
These are Teddy's Touchdown numbers in 2015.

Games

1. 0
2. 1
3. O 1 int
4. 1
5. 1 2 int
6. 2
7. 1 1 int
8. 0 1int
9. 1
10. 1
11. 1
12. 0 1int
13 0 1 int
14. 1
15. 4
16. 1
17.0 1int

8 fumbles

How long would have Case played this year with numbers like that.


Good question. What was Teddy's completion percentage, attempts and W/L record in those?

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:17 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1751
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
dead_poet wrote:
halfgiz wrote:
These are Teddy's Touchdown numbers in 2015.

Games

1. 0
2. 1
3. O 1 int
4. 1
5. 1 2 int
6. 2
7. 1 1 int
8. 0 1int
9. 1
10. 1
11. 1
12. 0 1int
13 0 1 int
14. 1
15. 4
16. 1
17.0 1int

8 fumbles

How long would have Case played this year with numbers like that.


Good question. What was Teddy's completion percentage, attempts and W/L record in those?


11-5

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... _games.htm

Edit: http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/min ... sults/2015

DP you can scan through that link. What's interesting is some games Teddy didn't throw a TD and we won.
Like game 8 we won in OT.


Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:36 pm
Profile
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 24352
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
halfgiz wrote:
dead_poet wrote:
halfgiz wrote:
These are Teddy's Touchdown numbers in 2015.

Games

1. 0
2. 1
3. O 1 int
4. 1
5. 1 2 int
6. 2
7. 1 1 int
8. 0 1int
9. 1
10. 1
11. 1
12. 0 1int
13 0 1 int
14. 1
15. 4
16. 1
17.0 1int

8 fumbles

How long would have Case played this year with numbers like that.


Good question. What was Teddy's completion percentage, attempts and W/L record in those?


11-5

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... _games.htm

Edit: http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/min ... sults/2015

DP you can scan through that link. What's interesting is some games Teddy didn't throw a TD and we won.
Like game 8 we won in OT.


I was being a little bit of a butt. I'm familiar with his stats.

I pretty much guarantee if the situation was reversed that 2015 Teddy would still be starting.

Teddy Bridgewater 2015 stats (through 12 games, behind a terrible offensive line, worse receivers and worse offensive coordinator):

W/L: 8-4 (Case: 9-3)
Completion %: 65% (Case: 66.8%)
TDs: 8 (Case: 18)
INTs: 8 (Case: 7)
Attempts/game: 28 (Case: 34)
Yards/game: 200 (Case: 248)

The Vikings were dead last in passing attempts/game in 2015 (probably smart given the comically terrible o-line) and if you remember correctly Norv stubbornly rarely liked to pass in the red zone.

We really weren't a passing team back then.

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:28 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1751
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
I agree on the terrible coordinator.
Wallace, Diggs, Thielen, Rudy and Wright had good games. Not a bad bunch of recievers

The offensive line gave AP a rushing title.
Our weakness was our passing game.


Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:29 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 18360
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
halfgiz wrote:
I agree on the terrible coordinator.
Wallace, Diggs, Thielen, Rudy and Wright had good games. Not a bad bunch of recievers

The offensive line gave AP a rushing title.
Our weakness was our passing game.
Agreed.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬


Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:38 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3306
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
halfgiz wrote:
dead_poet wrote:
halfgiz wrote:
These are Teddy's Touchdown numbers in 2015.

Games

1. 0
2. 1
3. O 1 int
4. 1
5. 1 2 int
6. 2
7. 1 1 int
8. 0 1int
9. 1
10. 1
11. 1
12. 0 1int
13 0 1 int
14. 1
15. 4
16. 1
17.0 1int

8 fumbles

How long would have Case played this year with numbers like that.


Good question. What was Teddy's completion percentage, attempts and W/L record in those?


11-5

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... _games.htm

Edit: http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/min ... sults/2015

DP you can scan through that link. What's interesting is some games Teddy didn't throw a TD and we won.
Like game 8 we won in OT.


My guess is Norv gave the ball To Peterson from the 10 yd line in. Take a look around the league. Many one yd TD passes to pad QBs stats. That's one of the reasons I don't care much for stats. I don't even know how many TD/INT Case has at the moment. The only thing that matters is the W. Look at Newton. He probably had terrible passing stats. Like him or not, he won the game for Carolina. IMO, it's what you do when the game is on the line that matters. That 3rd down completion to be able to run out the clock. Getting rid of the ball so you don't fall out of FG range. Those plays matter. Stats are for.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:55 pm
Profile
Practice Squad

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 7:38 pm
Posts: 29
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
I believe Teddy would be so much better in this offense than he was in that antiquated Norv Turner offense. I like, no I love the job that Case has done but Teddy would be better in spreading the ball around and not just buying so much time to look for Thielen. I do like how Rudolph is utilized in the redzone but if Teddy isn't playing it safe and give the playmakers a chance to make plays then he's a better QB imo because of ball placement.

On Sunday, Diggs ran an excellent route and the ball should have been on the outside but it was behind Diggs and the CB made a play on the ball to knock it away. This has happened several times this season where the ball placement has been off. I'm not saying Teddy would have definitely done better but I believe he would have.

My biggest concern is that Minnesota rewards Keenum's one good season with a large contract and he revert back to his usuall self. There are just too many examples of QB's having one good season and get paid handsomely (e.g., Elvis Grbac, Joe Flacco, Matt Castle, etc..)

I'd like to see what Teddy could do in this offense as opposed to an offense that clearly has the same routes as Tecmo Bowl


Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:14 am
Profile
Backup

Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:47 pm
Posts: 91
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
[quote="Gemfow"]I believe Teddy would be so much better in this offense than he was in that antiquated Norv Turner offense. I like, no I love the job that Case has done but Teddy would be better in spreading the ball around and not just buying so much time to look for Thielen. I do like how Rudolph is utilized in the redzone but if Teddy isn't playing it safe and give the playmakers a chance to make plays then he's a better QB imo because of ball placement.

On Sunday, Diggs ran an excellent route and the ball should have been on the outside but it was behind Diggs and the CB made a play on the ball to knock it away. This has happened several times this season where the ball placement has been off. I'm not saying Teddy would have definitely done better but I believe he would have.

My biggest concern is that Minnesota rewards Keenum's one good season with a large contract and he revert back to his usuall self. There are just too many examples of QB's having one good season and get paid handsomely (e.g., Elvis Grbac, Joe Flacco, Matt Castle, etc..)

I'd like to see what Teddy could do in this offense as opposed to an offense that clearly has the same routes as Tecmo Bowl[/quote

I agree. I firmly believe the biggest mistake made this year was not starting Teddy after the bye. He's a better quarterback. Zimmer and Shurmer know it too. They should have pushed their feeling harder on the captians. It was a safe play for them from a career standpoint though. I can see it costing this team a legit shot at a Ring. December, and into the playoffs is big boy football. From what I've seen, Case isn't gonna be the guy leading them to the promise land, he's been a product of the system and excellent o line play. Come January, football is played on another level, Pressure is real!
]


Last edited by Alaskan on Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:28 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Posts: 2910
Location: Missouri
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Gemfow wrote:
I'd like to see what Teddy could do in this offense as opposed to an offense that clearly has the same routes as Tecmo Bowl
:lol:
Such a good one-liner.


Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:29 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Posts: 9526
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Alaskan wrote:
Gemfow wrote:
I believe Teddy would be so much better in this offense than he was in that antiquated Norv Turner offense. I like, no I love the job that Case has done but Teddy would be better in spreading the ball around and not just buying so much time to look for Thielen.


I would submit that "buying time to look for Thielen" has been an EXCELLENT strategy for us this season.

_________________
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida


Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:31 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 8334
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
soflavike wrote:
Alaskan wrote:
Gemfow wrote:
I believe Teddy would be so much better in this offense than he was in that antiquated Norv Turner offense. I like, no I love the job that Case has done but Teddy would be better in spreading the ball around and not just buying so much time to look for Thielen.


I would submit that "buying time to look for Thielen" has been an EXCELLENT strategy for us this season.


When Case has time, yes. But if the Oline remains injured, Case will fall apart. He makes his best throws to Theilen, who I believe is his first read almost every play. Even then sometimes Theilen has to makes some awesome catches. The floaters come when Case is pressured, or has to look for another receiver. If the Oline comes together again, I dont think there will be a problem, and we will win the division. But if the Oline is as bad as last week, I think Zimmer will take a long look at starting Teddy. I dont care who is the QB, as long as we win the division. Im already afraid we have lost the 1st seed cause of how bad the entire team played last week.


Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:18 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 18360
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Case will be the starter until the Super Bowl if he's healthy. I just don't see Zimmer going away from that. You don't bench a starter who has win 8 games in less than 16.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬


Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:34 pm
Profile YIM WWW
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1751
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
soflavike wrote:


I would submit that "buying time to look for Thielen" has been an EXCELLENT strategy for us this season.


When Case has time, yes. But if the Oline remains injured, Case will fall apart. He makes his best throws to Theilen, who I believe is his first read almost every play. Even then sometimes Theilen has to makes some awesome catches. The floaters come when Case is pressured, or has to look for another receiver. If the Oline comes together again, I dont think there will be a problem, and we will win the division. But if the Oline is as bad as last week, I think Zimmer will take a long look at starting Teddy. I dont care who is the QB, as long as we win the division. Im already afraid we have lost the 1st seed cause of how bad the entire team played last week.


If the Oline is as bad as last week.
Keenum - 6 sacks 10 hits and 20 hurries a career high.
Why would you want to subject Teddy to that?


Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:41 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6900
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
When Case has time, yes. But if the Oline remains injured, Case will fall apart. He makes his best throws to Theilen, who I believe is his first read almost every play. Even then sometimes Theilen has to makes some awesome catches. The floaters come when Case is pressured, or has to look for another receiver. If the Oline comes together again, I dont think there will be a problem, and we will win the division. But if the Oline is as bad as last week, I think Zimmer will take a long look at starting Teddy. I dont care who is the QB, as long as we win the division. Im already afraid we have lost the 1st seed cause of how bad the entire team played last week.

I've been trying not to engage you in these pointless Case vs. Teddy arguments, but I just have to ask ... WTF are you talking about?

Case Keenum through Week 13 ranked 5th in the entire NFL against the blitz, and top 10 against pressure. His great strength this year has been extending plays in the pocket and keeping his eyes down the field to make completions. And "floaters"? Keenum has the 5th fewest throws that could have or should have resulted in turnovers (PFF calls them "turnover-worthy" throws).

And you keep singing this "Thielen has to make awesome catches" tune, which is just plain false. It was more true early in the season, but it's not true now. Not any more than any other top-10 QB. Yes, Top-10, which Keenum is -- despite your never-ending campaign to get Teddy Bridgewater in the lineup.

Finally, given the uncertainty of his physical condition, Teddy needs MORE protection than Keenum, not less.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:51 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 8334
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
When Case has time, yes. But if the Oline remains injured, Case will fall apart. He makes his best throws to Theilen, who I believe is his first read almost every play. Even then sometimes Theilen has to makes some awesome catches. The floaters come when Case is pressured, or has to look for another receiver. If the Oline comes together again, I dont think there will be a problem, and we will win the division. But if the Oline is as bad as last week, I think Zimmer will take a long look at starting Teddy. I dont care who is the QB, as long as we win the division. Im already afraid we have lost the 1st seed cause of how bad the entire team played last week.

I've been trying not to engage you in these pointless Case vs. Teddy arguments, but I just have to ask ... WTF are you talking about?

Case Keenum through Week 13 ranked 5th in the entire NFL against the blitz, and top 10 against pressure. His great strength this year has been extending plays in the pocket and keeping his eyes down the field to make completions. And "floaters"? Keenum has the 5th fewest throws that could have or should have resulted in turnovers (PFF calls them "turnover-worthy" throws).

And you keep singing this "Thielen has to make awesome catches" tune, which is just plain false. It was more true early in the season, but it's not true now. Not any more than any other top-10 QB. Yes, Top-10, which Keenum is -- despite your never-ending campaign to get Teddy Bridgewater in the lineup.

Finally, given the uncertainty of his physical condition, Teddy needs MORE protection than Keenum, not less.


If you want to continue this sh!t and say Case is the better QB, fine. I was done with it but i'll say a few more things. !st, WTF are you talking about? He had 6 freaking sack when the Oline stunk. I wasnt talking about before that here. Ponder could have played behind that Oline and he played like a horses as$. Also, Shurmur had been calling great plays up till last week, which helped Case a lot. I dont think they threw more then 2 of the short screen passes to Kyle or the RBs that had worked so well before.

Case had 3 turnovers in one game. I think that matches Teddy's worse game, when he had about 1/2 a second to throw the ball.

I DONT WANT TEDDY PLAYING AS LONG AS CASE IS PLAYING WELL. I dont know how else to tell you that. I want the team to win. I have faith Teddy can get the job done as well as Case, but Im not calling for a switch. Yet.

The receivers have all made better catches this year, then since the Moss and Carter days. With Reid pitching in. AT has bailed Case out and given him a ton of YAC. Thats great, I like the short game and let the receivers try and break it. But you cant deny the catches these receivers are making, with Case just throwing the ball in the general direction sometime. Look at Kyles TD catch last week. And Diggs ball that bounced off him. No reason to throw the ball that high. And if you aernt seeing the balls flotaing on Case occasionally, I dont know what to say. He has been very lucky not to have more INTs. I think we would have won if he could hit Diggs and AT on full run and drop it into their hands instead of them stopping to catch it.

Theres no way the doctors would put Teddy out there if he wasnt ready. He has had a lot more time to recover then others who have with those knee injuries. He's young and will heal fast. But your right, he will always be like Bradford in that hes a QB with a knee injury. The Vikes may have to go after another QB this year fairly early.

Finally, I hope Case plays out the season, and playoffs. That will mean the Vikings are back on track.


Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:01 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8264
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
I don't think he said Case was the better quarterback, I think he specifically took issue because what you said about Case that just isn't accurate ...

Quote:
When Case has time, yes. But if the Oline remains injured, Case will fall apart. He makes his best throws to Theilen, who I believe is his first read almost every play. Even then sometimes Theilen has to makes some awesome catches. The floaters come when Case is pressured, or has to look for another receiver.


Case is one of the best QBs against the blitz in the league at the moment and the moves he was putting on the Panthers when the oline broke down last game were really awesome. I was actually commenting to a friend as we watched the game how cool he was under pressure as if Teddy's personality had rubbed off on him a little.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:09 am
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6900
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
When Case has time, yes. But if the Oline remains injured, Case will fall apart. He makes his best throws to Theilen, who I believe is his first read almost every play. Even then sometimes Theilen has to makes some awesome catches. The floaters come when Case is pressured, or has to look for another receiver. If the Oline comes together again, I dont think there will be a problem, and we will win the division. But if the Oline is as bad as last week, I think Zimmer will take a long look at starting Teddy. I dont care who is the QB, as long as we win the division. Im already afraid we have lost the 1st seed cause of how bad the entire team played last week.

I've been trying not to engage you in these pointless Case vs. Teddy arguments, but I just have to ask ... WTF are you talking about?

Case Keenum through Week 13 ranked 5th in the entire NFL against the blitz, and top 10 against pressure. His great strength this year has been extending plays in the pocket and keeping his eyes down the field to make completions. And "floaters"? Keenum has the 5th fewest throws that could have or should have resulted in turnovers (PFF calls them "turnover-worthy" throws).

And you keep singing this "Thielen has to make awesome catches" tune, which is just plain false. It was more true early in the season, but it's not true now. Not any more than any other top-10 QB. Yes, Top-10, which Keenum is -- despite your never-ending campaign to get Teddy Bridgewater in the lineup.

Finally, given the uncertainty of his physical condition, Teddy needs MORE protection than Keenum, not less.


If you want to continue this sh!t and say Case is the better QB, fine. I was done with it but i'll say a few more things. !st, WTF are you talking about? He had 6 freaking sack when the Oline stunk. I wasnt talking about before that here. Ponder could have played behind that Oline and he played like a horses as$. Also, Shurmur had been calling great plays up till last week, which helped Case a lot. I dont think they threw more then 2 of the short screen passes to Kyle or the RBs that had worked so well before.

Case had 3 turnovers in one game. I think that matches Teddy's worse game, when he had about 1/2 a second to throw the ball.

I DONT WANT TEDDY PLAYING AS LONG AS CASE IS PLAYING WELL. I dont know how else to tell you that. I want the team to win. I have faith Teddy can get the job done as well as Case, but Im not calling for a switch. Yet.

The receivers have all made better catches this year, then since the Moss and Carter days. With Reid pitching in. AT has bailed Case out and given him a ton of YAC. Thats great, I like the short game and let the receivers try and break it. But you cant deny the catches these receivers are making, with Case just throwing the ball in the general direction sometime. Look at Kyles TD catch last week. And Diggs ball that bounced off him. No reason to throw the ball that high. And if you aernt seeing the balls flotaing on Case occasionally, I dont know what to say. He has been very lucky not to have more INTs. I think we would have won if he could hit Diggs and AT on full run and drop it into their hands instead of them stopping to catch it.

Theres no way the doctors would put Teddy out there if he wasnt ready. He has had a lot more time to recover then others who have with those knee injuries. He's young and will heal fast. But your right, he will always be like Bradford in that hes a QB with a knee injury. The Vikes may have to go after another QB this year fairly early.

Finally, I hope Case plays out the season, and playoffs. That will mean the Vikings are back on track.

First, YOU are the one who's on a campaign to replace Keenum with Teddy. You SAY you want Case playing as long as he's playing well ... it's technically not a lie, but the problem is that you REFUSE to acknowledge when he plays well. If he has a good game, it's Shurmur's playcalling, or his receivers bailing him out, or his offensive line. It's NEVER HIM. If a pass falls incomplete, its "that ball should have been picked off."

Here's a great example of what I'm talking about ... the TD throw to Rudulph. If you're going to use THAT throw as an example of a bad throw, well, you're proving my point. In a pretty mediocre game from Keenum, that was the best throw he made all day. He put it in a tight window between three defenders. I find it unbelievable that you would use that throw as your example.

As for your primary statement regarding Keenum's supposed lack of ability under pressure, when I present you HARD STATISTICAL EVIDENCE of how wrong that statement is, your response is some kind of nonsense about Ponder. Oh, and how I left out Week 14. The only reason I left out Week 14 is because those stats aren't available to non-subscribers yet. But you see it as a conspiracy.

I will also cite another advanced statistic: Turnover-worthy throws. It's an actual stat from PFF. Case Keenum came into Week 14 ranked 5th in the NFL with just 2.1% turnover-worthy throws. And in spite of having 2 interceptions, that number will not likely rise, as PFF will not see the Diggs interception as a turnover-worthy throw (not a good throw, but not turnover-worthy, since Diggs got both hands on it). So I'm sorry, but your "he's very lucky not to have more INTs" statement is purely subjective on your part. Once again, you have no data to back up your hard-and-fast opinions.

In summary: When it comes to Keenum's supposed lack of ability under pressure and penchant for turnovers, YOU ARE WRONG. The statistics prove it.

Now let me be clear. This was obviously not Case's best game. The first interception was really bad. The second one was primarily his fault ... deliver that ball on the money, and Diggs doesn't have the chance to let it doink off his head. A better throw to Diggs at the pylon results in a TD. It wasn't a great game by any stretch. That being said, Cris Carter put it best: If you didn't attach a name to the stat line or the game film, if it were any other starting quarterback, nobody would be asking whether it's time to replace him. In spite of everything that happened, this game was tied at the 2-minute warning, and a lot of that was due to the play of Case Keenum.

As for Teddy, I never said he'd be hobbling around like old man Bradford. I simply said that if the O-line is banged up and leaking, that's not the time I'd want Teddy in there, GIVEN THAT HE'S NEVER ACTUALLY TAKEN A HIT SINCE COMING BACK. You say, "They wouldn't put him out there if he wasn't ready." That's fine, but it seems to me that the time to test that readiness isn't under the worst of conditions. I will concede, however, that is purely my opinion, no more valid than yours.

If you want me to stop arguing with you about this, then stop calling Keenum lucky and give hime some credit. Or give me some data to prove your points.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:53 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Posts: 3438
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
halfgiz wrote:
I agree on the terrible coordinator.
Wallace, Diggs, Thielen, Rudy and Wright had good games. Not a bad bunch of recievers

The offensive line gave AP a rushing title.
Our weakness was our passing game.


Maybe in Soviet Russia the OL gave AP the title that year. More like AP got the title despite the OL. The 2015 OL was HORRIBLE. Kalil Turnstyle, Clemmings basically not there even though he was there...

I do get that the 2015 Offense surrounding cast was not as good as what we have in 2017, but that being said, Case has put up elite numbers. So I still think the question of whether or not to start Teddy is a bit silly at this point.

_________________
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi


Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:27 pm
Profile
Rookie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:45 am
Posts: 35
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
KBR (Keep, Bench, Release)

Out of Bradford, Bridgwaters and Keenum.

I would :

Keep Keenum
Bench Bridgewater
Release Bradford

But that's just me. :confused:

_________________
Tene Quod Bene


Mon Dec 25, 2017 2:23 pm
Profile
Transition Player
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:38 am
Posts: 359
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
I don't think Teddy would have done as well as Cass has coming off that injury.

_________________
Offseason Goal: Draft durable, tough, intelligent offensive lineman who are dependable technicians and avoid penalties aka drive killers.


Mon Dec 25, 2017 3:09 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
Posts: 7305
Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
Post Re: If Teddy Bridgewater was put in at QB week 2, he would..
Case will be the starting QB next year too. It's his team now, Get used to it


Tue Dec 26, 2017 3:55 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: fiestavike and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.