IrishViking wrote:This right here is a pretty clear example. 3 years and the honeymoon is still going strong.
Yes, it is...
Pondering Her Percy wrote:See very little flexibility?? He had a disagreement with his offensive coordinator because HE wanted to make a change. Norv didnt. He realized that what they were doing offensively was going to get a QB killed.
Thats being an adaptable coach Jim.
"Very little" doesn't mean "zero". I'm not saying he doesn't adapt at all. Of course he does. All coaches do to some extent.
He's adapting to what we have on the offensive line and wanted to create a short pass game to keep Sam upright. He's always been known as a guy that adapts to his players strengths. He's told the media that was exactly how his father was too. It's like you have this vision in your head that since he's a hard nosed coach he's just automatically stubborn and thats not the case. You might as well just come out and say that you arent the biggest fan of Mike Zimmer and Rick Spielman because that is becoming more and more clear as the days go on.
Good. I've made it clear for years now that I'm not a big fan of the overall job Rick Spielman has done with the Vikings GM and I've been on the fence about Zimmer since his first season with the team (not against him, just not sold on him). I was not among the fans who embraced his arrival without skepticism or among those who declared him a great head coach, the best since Grant, etc. I've made that very clear all along too.
At this point, why wouldn't a Vikings fan be skeptical about Zimmer? The sun doesn't rise and set on defense. The offense has been gradually driven into the ground under this staff and only the utterly pathetic Rams offense is preventing the Vikes from finally hitting rock bottom in that department this season so no, I'm not Zimmer's biggest fan but I would like him to make me a bigger fan and I'd like him to succeed as Vikings head coach. There's plenty to like about the man. I'm not rooting against him.
I am a varsity lacrosse and football coach. I've seen stubborn and I've seen adaptable. I've been my fair share of both throughout my career. The main reason Norv Turner is gone is because Mike Zimmer WANTED to make a change on offense. Zimmer has been known to make adjustments, especially defensively, throughout games. Unlike that Frazier guy that you some reason supported a few years back
Frazier made in-game adjustments too. That's such an obvious fact it's not even worth arguing about. I supported him because I think he's a good coach and because I felt the Vikings dealt him a bad hand. I support Zimmer too but that support isn't blind. I was critical of his predecessor at times and I'm critical of him. I've also praised both coaches but one of the key differences between Frazier's situation and Zimmer's is the latter has had the
full support of the organization all along. He has clearly had a voice in how the team has been constructed over the past 3 years and consequently, I think he deserves to be criticized along with Spielman for the team's problems, just like he deserves praise for the strengths established during his tenure thus far.
All of that strikes me as a pretty fair position.