Inside losperros' quote. I remember in this thread or another you were curious as to what the philosophical difference between the two may have been.Mothman wrote:
Wait... what are you quoting? I think I missed something.
Norv Turner Resigns as OC
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
I am curious.PacificNorseWest wrote:Inside losperros' quote. I remember in this thread or another you were curious as to what the philosophical difference between the two may have been.
Thanks for the explanation. I'm sorry it was necessary. My focus is all over the place today... in other words, I'm unfocused.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
I hate to be pessimistic, but in the short term, Norv's resignation and Shurmur's ascension is not going to many any difference. It is still the same OL, the same RB's, the same QB, etc. The playbook will not change dramatically mid-season and the realities of masking our porous OL with "safe" plays will keep the offense one-dimensional and easily neutralized. It's going to be a bumpy ride and we will struggle to get into the playoffs.
Hope I'm wrong.
Hope I'm wrong.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
I dont think we cant be both safe and dynamic enough on offense. The Eagles are a good blueprint to,follow. With an oline with that many injuries and suspensions and a rookie QB they have looked solid. They do a really good job of getting the ball to playmakers in space and we have the weapons to do the same. With guys like Mckinnon, Patterson, and Diggs we can throw lots of swing passes, slants, screens, etc to get them room to run. Obviously we are limites due to our line, but if we get creative we have plenty at the skill positions to have a decent offense.
Sent from my RS988 using Tapatalk
Sent from my RS988 using Tapatalk
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
I am as well. It was a lazy post, so don't feel bad.Mothman wrote: I am curious.
Thanks for the explanation. I'm sorry it was necessary. My focus is all over the place today... in other words, I'm unfocused.
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
The point I tried to make is who is making the choices. Since the case by case basis is both on offense and defense, we know Norv couldn't have been making all the decisions about being conservative with any particular rookies.Mothman wrote: They've started some rookies so it seems to be a choice they make on a case by case basis.
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
Sorry, I did understand your point. My comment was meant more as a general statement in the midst of the discussion rather than a direct reply to your point. Unfortunately I didn't make that clear at all!losperros wrote: The point I tried to make is who is making the choices. Since the case by case basis is both on offense and defense, we know Norv couldn't have been making all the decisions about being conservative with any particular rookies.
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
No problemo, Jim. Had I articulated myself better there never would have been any confusion.Mothman wrote: Sorry, I did understand your point. My comment was meant more as a general statement in the midst of the discussion rather than a direct reply to your point. Unfortunately I didn't make that clear at all!
So we're both guilty.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
Maybe Norv wanted to go with Shaun Hill or Taylor Heinecke and the organization (somewhat understandably) is comited and locked in to Bradford given what they mortgaged to get him.
Bradford has proven he isn't capable of performing in that offensive system, so maybe it was just destined to fail so long as Norv was onboard.
Bradford has proven he isn't capable of performing in that offensive system, so maybe it was just destined to fail so long as Norv was onboard.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
That seems extraordinarily unlikely.fiestavike wrote:Maybe Norv wanted to go with Shaun Hill or Taylor Heinecke and the organization (somewhat understandably) is comited and locked in to Bradford given what they mortgaged to get him.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
I think this team would be at least 6-4 (if not better) with Shaun Hill under center.Mothman wrote: That seems extraordinarily unlikely.
Heinecke would be the most sensible play longterm. Can he play at least as good as Sam? probably, but let's find out. If the Vikings move on from Bradford, and Peterson, along with several other players who carry 0 or minimal cap hits, they can clear between 50-60 million to work on the offensive line.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4672
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
- x 405
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
fiestavike wrote: I think this team would be at least 6-4 (if not better) with Shaun Hill under center.
Heinecke would be the most sensible play longterm. Can he play at least as good as Sam? probably, but let's find out. If the Vikings move on from Bradford, and Peterson, along with several other players who carry 0 or minimal cap hits, they can clear between 50-60 million to work on the offensive line.
Seriously? Whoa. You really do not like Bradford, eh? I think he's played very well and if not for him we'd likely be 3-7 or so.
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
fiestavike wrote:I think this team would be at least 6-4 (if not better) with Shaun Hill under center.
I don't and if Norv felt strongly that Hill should be the QB (and could last the season), I doubt the Bradford trade would have happened in the first place. Hill's limitations would probably have made the offense even more one-dimensional than it's been with a terrible running game. They'd be easier to defend with Hill at QB, not harder.
"Probably"? Based on a handful of decent pre-season games?Heinecke would be the most sensible play longterm. Can he play at least as good as Sam? probably, but let's find out.
Heinicke hasn't even been healthy enough to play for most of this season and there's no reason to believe that once he returned, Norv favored him over Bradford so much that he resigned because he couldn't play him.
- chicagopurple
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
- x 88
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
what is with all this Bradford hate? The guy does the ONE thing that Teddy did well (not throw INTs), has a good quick release game (the ONLY reason he is still alive), and is a reasonable leader. Can he throw deep balls accurately? Not frequently but seemingly better then Teddy. Our other back ups havent shown any reason to believe that they are better then this. Its crazy to suggest that our team is being held back by a lack of QB talent. We are limited by having absolutely NO Ol and a few back up role players at RB who arent capable of posing a run threat when they get no blocking.
Re: Norv Turner Resigns as OC
Hiencke wasn't much of an option at the time of the trade.
I think Norv liked Bradford based on what i remember from the comments. i think Norv is gone because his system/philosophy has requirements that are very difficult to achieve in todays game...how it played out is moot to me. it just wasn't working.
I can't guess what they mighta got outta hill/hiencke...but i don't think that woulda been a bad move for the long term either, to fiesta's point.
gotta see how it all plays out. i'm sure the new stadium had some effect on their reasoning to go after bradford. maybe they flinched and maybe the crushed it...we'll see.
-
i read this morn on another board that the offense this season under norv was getting 1.6something pts per drive, which put them near the bottom of the league.
Since shurmur has been at the helm they are @ 1.9...middle of the pack.
just posting a number, not making any clims about it~
I think Norv liked Bradford based on what i remember from the comments. i think Norv is gone because his system/philosophy has requirements that are very difficult to achieve in todays game...how it played out is moot to me. it just wasn't working.
I can't guess what they mighta got outta hill/hiencke...but i don't think that woulda been a bad move for the long term either, to fiesta's point.
gotta see how it all plays out. i'm sure the new stadium had some effect on their reasoning to go after bradford. maybe they flinched and maybe the crushed it...we'll see.
-
i read this morn on another board that the offense this season under norv was getting 1.6something pts per drive, which put them near the bottom of the league.
Since shurmur has been at the helm they are @ 1.9...middle of the pack.
just posting a number, not making any clims about it~