Author |
Message |
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm Posts: 3200 Location: Sebastian, FL
|
 Super Bowl odds. Oct 27th update.
Updated the odds for the start of the regular season. Also have them from Aug 27 before the final cuts and Bridgewaters injury. Code: Team Feb 14 May 4 Aug 27 Sep 5 Arizona Cardinals 15-1 18-1 12-1 12-1 Atlanta Falcons 40-1 60-1 70-1 70-1 Baltimore Ravens 30-1 30-1 35-1 35-1 Buffalo Bills 40-1 45-1 75-1 75-1 Carolina Panthers 10-1 13-1 10-1 10-1 Chicago Bears 50-1 50-1 55-1 70-1 Cincinnati Bengals 18-1 16-1 20-1 20-1 Cleveland Browns 200-1 200-1 200-1 200-1 Dallas Cowboys 20-1 18-1 20-1 30-1 Denver Broncos 20-1 12-1 16-1 15-1 Detroit Lions 40-1 70-1 80-1 80-1 Green Bay Packers 12-1 11-1 17-2 7-1 Houston Texans 50-1 40-1 60-1 40-1 Indianapolis Colts 20-2 20-1 25-1 25-1 Jacksonville Jaguars 60-1 85-1 50-1 60-1 Kansas City Chiefs 25-1 25-1 23-1 25-1 Los Angeles Rams 50-1 60-1 65-1 80-1 Miami Dolphins 55-1 60-1 70-1 70-1 Minnesota Vikings 25-1 18-1 18-1 30-1 New England Patriots 10-1 15-2 7-1 7-1 New Orleans Saints 40-1 60-1 65-1 65-1 New York Giants 50-1 32-1 30-1 25-1 New York Jets 40-1 40-1 60-1 60-1 Oakland Raiders 60-1 35-1 30-1 30-1 Philadelphia Eagles 55-1 65-1 80-1 70-1 Pittsburgh Steelers 10-1 10-1 10-1 10-1 San Diego Chargers 60-1 100-1 80-1 80-1 San Franciso 49ers 50-1 80-1 150-1 150-1 Seattle Seahawks 10-1 9-1 9-1 8-1 Tampa Bay Bucs 60-1 60-1 80-1 75-1 Tennessee Titans 60-1 75-1 100-1 100-1 Washington Redskins 40-1 50-1 65-1 50-1
_________________ Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
Last edited by Raptorman on Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Thu Feb 04, 2016 6:36 pm |
|
 |
jackal
Strong Safety
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am Posts: 11532 Location: California
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
I would think the Patriots would have best odds given their dominance over the division and ability to circumvent the rules.
_________________ no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
|
Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:03 am |
|
 |
Laserman
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am Posts: 7305 Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
Dallas has better odds than the Vikings???? Yeah right. Romo is one more good hit away from retirement. They better draft a QB fast. Romo will get injured again and miss alot of games mark my words.
|
Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:31 am |
|
 |
jackal
Strong Safety
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am Posts: 11532 Location: California
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
Browns only 200/1 laughs... they must have given the Packers better odds because of the Refs giving them a few wins.. of phantom face masks and holds
_________________ no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
|
Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:19 am |
|
 |
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm Posts: 2992
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
jackal wrote: Browns only 200/1 laughs... they must have given the Packers better odds because of the Refs giving them a few wins.. of phantom face masks and holds Does that contrast with the thanksgiving game or divisional playoff game that they stole from us? 
_________________ "Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
|
Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:48 am |
|
 |
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm Posts: 2992
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
The Steelers are a very good game but idk if they should be that high up.
_________________ "Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
|
Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:48 am |
|
 |
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am Posts: 3387
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
Jordysghost wrote: jackal wrote: Browns only 200/1 laughs... they must have given the Packers better odds because of the Refs giving them a few wins.. of phantom face masks and holds Does that contrast with the thanksgiving game or divisional playoff game that they stole from us?  I'd like to see the rules about holding be implemented when Green Bay's offense is on the field. It would be interesting to see what it would do to their production. 
|
Sun Feb 14, 2016 1:38 pm |
|
 |
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm Posts: 2992
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
fiestavike wrote: Jordysghost wrote: jackal wrote: Browns only 200/1 laughs... they must have given the Packers better odds because of the Refs giving them a few wins.. of phantom face masks and holds Does that contrast with the thanksgiving game or divisional playoff game that they stole from us?  I'd like to see the rules about holding be implemented when Green Bay's offense is on the field. It would be interesting to see what it would do to their production.  Are you kidding? We been at the top of the league in holding quite a few times the last decade or so, I know I would have liked the blatant holding on the last ot drive of the Divisional playoff game to be called, but im afraid that went the way of the 09 Wildcard facemask no call.
_________________ "Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
|
Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:14 am |
|
 |
jackal
Strong Safety
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am Posts: 11532 Location: California
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
I wouldn't be surprised for Wallace to go to the Raiders or back to the steelers...
He needs a down the field deep threat QB and system to succeed in the NFL.
_________________ no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
|
Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:49 pm |
|
 |
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am Posts: 3387
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
Jordysghost wrote: fiestavike wrote: I'd like to see the rules about holding be implemented when Green Bay's offense is on the field. It would be interesting to see what it would do to their production.  Are you kidding? We been at the top of the league in holding quite a few times the last decade or so, I know I would have liked the blatant holding on the last ot drive of the Divisional playoff game to be called, but im afraid that went the way of the 09 Wildcard facemask no call. Yes, but I'd like to see the rules about holding implemented the other 98 percent of the time that GBs offense is on the field.
|
Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:00 am |
|
 |
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm Posts: 2992
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
fiestavike wrote: Jordysghost wrote: fiestavike wrote: I'd like to see the rules about holding be implemented when Green Bay's offense is on the field. It would be interesting to see what it would do to their production.  Are you kidding? We been at the top of the league in holding quite a few times the last decade or so, I know I would have liked the blatant holding on the last ot drive of the Divisional playoff game to be called, but im afraid that went the way of the 09 Wildcard facemask no call. Yes, but I'd like to see the rules about holding implemented the other 98 percent of the time that GBs offense is on the field. If they decide to stop making the Packers the leagues sacrificial lamb, im all for it. Your welcome for replay review and the official refs, btw. 
_________________ "Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
|
Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:41 am |
|
 |
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm Posts: 3200 Location: Sebastian, FL
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
Bump. Updated the odds.
_________________ Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
|
Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:21 pm |
|
 |
jackal
Strong Safety
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am Posts: 11532 Location: California
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
I am surprised the Pats have that good of odds with Brady out for four games ?
_________________ no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
|
Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:26 am |
|
 |
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm Posts: 3200 Location: Sebastian, FL
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
I wanted to do this at the end of the first quarter of games, but, things got in the way. Anyway, updated Vegas line as of October 27. I will update again around the 2/3 mark of the season. Code: Team Feb 14 May 4 Aug 27 Sep 5 Oct 27 Arizona Cardinals 15-1 18-1 12-1 12-1 18-1 Atlanta Falcons 40-1 60-1 70-1 70-1 20-1 Baltimore Ravens 30-1 30-1 35-1 35-1 100-1 Buffalo Bills 40-1 45-1 75-1 75-1 60-1 Carolina Panthers 10-1 13-1 10-1 10-1 65-1 Chicago Bears 50-1 50-1 55-1 70-1 250-1 Cincinnati Bengals 18-1 16-1 20-1 20-1 75-1 Cleveland Browns 200-1 200-1 200-1 200-1 9999-1 Dallas Cowboys 20-1 18-1 20-1 30-1 15-1 Denver Broncos 20-1 12-1 16-1 15-1 15-1 Detroit Lions 40-1 70-1 80-1 80-1 100-1 Green Bay Packers 12-1 11-1 17-2 7-1 9-1 Houston Texans 50-1 40-1 60-1 40-1 40-1 Indianapolis Colts 20-2 20-1 25-1 25-1 60-1 Jacksonville Jaguars 60-1 85-1 50-1 60-1 250-1 Kansas City Chiefs 25-1 25-1 23-1 25-1 22-1 Los Angeles Rams 50-1 60-1 65-1 80-1 150-1 Miami Dolphins 55-1 60-1 70-1 70-1 150-1 Minnesota Vikings 25-1 18-1 18-1 30-1 10-1 New England Patriots 10-1 15-2 7-1 7-1 14-5 New Orleans Saints 40-1 60-1 65-1 65-1 150-1 New York Giants 50-1 32-1 30-1 25-1 30-1 New York Jets 40-1 40-1 60-1 60-1 200-1 Oakland Raiders 60-1 35-1 30-1 30-1 30-1 Philadelphia Eagles 55-1 65-1 80-1 70-1 35-1 Pittsburgh Steelers 10-1 10-1 10-1 10-1 15-1 San Diego Chargers 60-1 100-1 80-1 80-1 60-1 San Franciso 49ers 50-1 80-1 150-1 150-1 9999-1 Seattle Seahawks 10-1 9-1 9-1 8-1 6-1 Tampa Bay Bucs 60-1 60-1 80-1 75-1 100-1 Tennessee Titans 60-1 75-1 100-1 100-1 250-1 Washington Redskins 40-1 50-1 65-1 50-1 60-1
_________________ Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
|
Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:40 am |
|
 |
Laserman
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am Posts: 7305 Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
|
 Re: Super Bowl odds. 2017 version.
Laserman wrote: Dallas has better odds than the Vikings???? Yeah right. Romo is one more good hit away from retirement. They better draft a QB fast. Romo will get injured again and miss alot of games mark my words. I was right on Romo
|
Sun Nov 06, 2016 2:45 pm |
|
 |
|