Overtime rules.
Moderator: Moderators
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Overtime rules.
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?
I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.
Thoughts.
I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.
Thoughts.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Overtime rules.
Clay should shut the #### up.Raptorman wrote:So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?
I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.
Thoughts.
It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.
I like the OT rules.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Overtime rules.
You mean like dragging Palmer down out of bounds? Had that happened to Rodgers you would have been all over it like white on rice.Jordysghost wrote: Clay should shut the #### up.
It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.
I like the OT rules.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
Re: Overtime rules.
I never want to see the college OT rules applied in the NFL. I'd actually prefer it if the NFL went back to the previous "sudden death" OT format: first team to score wins, regardless of how they score.Raptorman wrote:So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?
To Matthews' comments: if you want to see your offense take the field under the current rules, stop the other team from scoring.
Re: Overtime rules.
if you want to complain about the officiating, you know where to do it.Jordysghost wrote: Clay should shut the #### up.
It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.
I like the OT rules.
Re: Overtime rules.
Like the current setup.
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Overtime rules.
Right, like the uncalled facemask to end 09 right? I mean, that was on Rodgers soooooo.......Raptorman wrote: You mean like dragging Palmer down out of bounds? Had that happened to Rodgers you would have been all over it like white on rice.
You know the call I am speaking of, but on further moderator direction I will not discuss it here.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Overtime rules.
As much as the Packers got jobbed, I agree, Clay should shut the #### up.Mothman wrote: I never want to see the college OT rules applied in the NFL. I'd actually prefer it if the NFL went back to the previous "sudden death" OT format: first team to score wins, regardless of how they score.
To Matthews' comments: if you want to see your offense take the field under the current rules, stop the other team from scoring.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Re: Overtime rules.
Matthews needs to take this up with ownership.
Bears last year proposed OT rule change to ensure each team a possession after Packers lost NFC title to SEA on 1st drive. GB voted against.
Re: Overtime rules.
S197 wrote:Matthews needs to take this up with ownership.
LOL!
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Overtime rules.
Clay is just an idiot who needs to shutup.Mothman wrote:
LOL!
Im glad the Packers voted against, and I hope they persist should the issue arise in the future.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Re: Overtime rules.
Honestly, I'm glad they voted against it too. I was just amused by the irony...Jordysghost wrote:Clay is just an idiot who needs to shutup.
Im glad the Packers voted against, and I hope they persist should the issue arise in the future.
As I said above, I preferred the "sudden death" rules.
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Overtime rules.
I don't find it that ironic, it is large organisation it figures a player wouldn't agree on everything with management.Mothman wrote: Honestly, I'm glad they voted against it too. I was just amused by the irony...
As I said above, I preferred the "sudden death" rules.
Yea, it would be very sad to see the NFL move toward a college like OT implementation, just.. no.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011