View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:41 pm



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
 Overtime rules. 
Author Message
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Sebastian, FL
Post Overtime rules.
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?

I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.

Thoughts.

_________________
This space for rent.


Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:18 pm
Profile
Packers Suck

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Posts: 2993
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Raptorman wrote:
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?

I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.

Thoughts.


Clay should shut the #### up.

It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.

I like the OT rules.

_________________
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011


Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:31 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Sebastian, FL
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Jordysghost wrote:
Raptorman wrote:
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?

I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.

Thoughts.


Clay should shut the #### up.

It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.

I like the OT rules.

You mean like dragging Palmer down out of bounds? Had that happened to Rodgers you would have been all over it like white on rice.

_________________
This space for rent.


Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:44 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Raptorman wrote:
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?


I never want to see the college OT rules applied in the NFL. I'd actually prefer it if the NFL went back to the previous "sudden death" OT format: first team to score wins, regardless of how they score.

To Matthews' comments: if you want to see your offense take the field under the current rules, stop the other team from scoring.


Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:45 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Jordysghost wrote:
Raptorman wrote:
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?

I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.

Thoughts.


Clay should shut the #### up.

It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.

I like the OT rules.


if you want to complain about the officiating, you know where to do it. :)


Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:47 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10492
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Like the current setup.


Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:11 pm
Profile
Packers Suck

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Posts: 2993
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Raptorman wrote:
Jordysghost wrote:
Raptorman wrote:
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?

I could see it. However, Would not start on the 25, I would have them start at the 40, the 25 makes FG's just to easy for NFL kickers.

Thoughts.


Clay should shut the #### up.

It be irrelevant if the refs hadn't handed ARI 7 on a blatant uncalled penalty.

I like the OT rules.

You mean like dragging Palmer down out of bounds? Had that happened to Rodgers you would have been all over it like white on rice.


Right, like the uncalled facemask to end 09 right? :wink: I mean, that was on Rodgers soooooo.......

You know the call I am speaking of, but on further moderator direction I will not discuss it here.

_________________
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011


Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:15 pm
Profile
Packers Suck

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Posts: 2993
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Mothman wrote:
Raptorman wrote:
So Clay Matthews is #### that the Packers didn't get to touch the ball in OT and thinks they should be changed to the college rules. What do you guys think?


I never want to see the college OT rules applied in the NFL. I'd actually prefer it if the NFL went back to the previous "sudden death" OT format: first team to score wins, regardless of how they score.

To Matthews' comments: if you want to see your offense take the field under the current rules, stop the other team from scoring.


As much as the Packers got jobbed, I agree, Clay should shut the #### up.

_________________
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011


Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:17 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10492
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Matthews needs to take this up with ownership.

Quote:
Bears last year proposed OT rule change to ensure each team a possession after Packers lost NFC title to SEA on 1st drive. GB voted against.


:lol:


Tue Jan 19, 2016 8:38 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Overtime rules.
S197 wrote:
Matthews needs to take this up with ownership.

Quote:
Bears last year proposed OT rule change to ensure each team a possession after Packers lost NFC title to SEA on 1st drive. GB voted against.


:lol:



LOL!


Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:49 am
Profile
Packers Suck

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Posts: 2993
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Mothman wrote:
S197 wrote:
Matthews needs to take this up with ownership.

Quote:
Bears last year proposed OT rule change to ensure each team a possession after Packers lost NFC title to SEA on 1st drive. GB voted against.


:lol:



LOL!


Clay is just an idiot who needs to shutup.

Im glad the Packers voted against, and I hope they persist should the issue arise in the future.

_________________
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011


Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:56 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Jordysghost wrote:
Clay is just an idiot who needs to shutup.

Im glad the Packers voted against, and I hope they persist should the issue arise in the future.


Honestly, I'm glad they voted against it too. I was just amused by the irony...

As I said above, I preferred the "sudden death" rules.


Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:25 am
Profile
Packers Suck

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Posts: 2993
Post Re: Overtime rules.
Mothman wrote:
Jordysghost wrote:
Clay is just an idiot who needs to shutup.

Im glad the Packers voted against, and I hope they persist should the issue arise in the future.


Honestly, I'm glad they voted against it too. I was just amused by the irony...

As I said above, I preferred the "sudden death" rules.


I don't find it that ironic, it is large organisation it figures a player wouldn't agree on everything with management.

Yea, it would be very sad to see the NFL move toward a college like OT implementation, just.. no.

_________________
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011


Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:24 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.