View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:21 am



Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 More New England Cheating? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post More New England Cheating?
http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/12 ... nship-game

Quote:
The NFL has found that 11 of 12 of the New England Patriots game balls were inflated significantly less than the NFL requires, league sources involved and familiar with the investigation of Sunday's AFC championship game told ESPN.

The investigation found the footballs were underinflated by 2 pounds per square inch of air less than what's required by NFL regulations during the Pats' 45-7 victory over the Indianapolis Colts, according to sources.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 8:33 am
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Either way, it's the NFL that looks like idiots. The refs are supposed to check them before the game and then hold onto them until it starts and then they handle them on every play.

I don't play football much anymore, but play volleyball a 1-2 times a week. I sure as hell can tell if a ball is that much lower.

I think it's a bigger deal to media/fans as many players(including the colts) seem to not care about it.
Quote:
Dwayne Allen ‏@Dallen83 8h8 hours ago

@NFLonFOX not a story. They could have played with soap for balls and beat us. Simply the better team. We have to continue to build! #BTM


Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:04 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
As I research this topic I've found a lot of 'they won 45-3 so who cares!?' sentiment ... kind of saying that the victory was so lop-sided that the ball being slightly deflated wouldn't have mattered. If the balls really were deflated I feel like it's a pretty huge advantage in those conditions (rainy and cold) especially while the other team is playing with a fully inflated ball. 11 deflated balls and 1 properly inflated for kicking.

Did the Patriots need to do this to win? We'll never know ... in the end, they cheated so we'll never know how much it mattered.

Where's all the outrage about the 'sanctity of the game' that we get when a player celebrates too hard or fake moons the crowd? A team that is going to the Super Bowl and has been caught cheating in the past is caught cheating again and nobody cares. Lucky one of the players didn't flip somebody off, that would be truly offensive.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:09 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
If it's determined that the Patriots cheated they should face appropriate consequences but personally, I think it's unlikely this inflation issue had a significant impact on the outcome of the game. I feel that way for two reasons:

1.) I thought the Patriots defense, their ground game, and the Colts inability to stop the run, were ultimately the biggest differences in the game.

2.) I heard on the radio that the officials discovered the issue at halftime. The game was relatively close at that point and the Pats blew it open in the second half. I'm assuming, perhaps incorrectly, that once the officials discovered the footballs were under-inflated they had the problem corrected, which should mean the Patriots didn't have whatever advantage that provides in the second half... when they blew the game wide open.

My main question is if this is a significant issue, and if under-inflating footballs can provide what the league considers a significant advantage, why the heck do the teams have anything to do with it at all? If it's supposed to be standardized it should be left out of their hands altogether and this shouldn't even be possible.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:21 am
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
Where's all the outrage about the 'sanctity of the game' that we get when a player celebrates too hard or fake moons the crowd? A team that is going to the Super Bowl and has been caught cheating in the past is caught cheating again and nobody cares. Lucky one of the players didn't flip somebody off, that would be truly offensive.

I don't recall being outraged about any of that stuff. I generally think it's funny. In this case though, I don't think it's really on the patriots. If they did cheat, it's the leagues fault for letting them. There is no reason that the footballs shouldn't be handled by the league(headsets too, we've heard those complaints enough as well). It literally takes less than 15 seconds to check ball pressure with a gauge that can fit in the refs pocket.

Also, as someone has posted(don't remember who), you can easily lose 20% of pressure on a cold day. Refs/guys holding the down markers/some other guys should just take responsibility and handle it. The nfl can afford to pay someone impartial to do it.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:36 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Mothman wrote:
If it's determined that the Patriots cheated they should face appropriate consequences but personally, I think it's unlikely this inflation issue had a significant impact on the outcome of the game. I feel that way for two reasons:

1.) I thought the Patriots defense, their ground game, and the Colts inability to stop the run, were ultimately the biggest differences in the game.


If the balls were properly inflated for the Colts then that would make the Patriot's defensive job a bit easier too, no? If a deflated ball is easier for the QB to grip and for the WR to catch, then on the other side of that coin a fully inflated ball is more difficult for the QB to handle and the WR to catch (especially in the kind of weather in that game).

I'm not saying it would have significantly impacted the game for sure, but if they did cheat, we'll never know. That's the problem with cheating, especially like this, you can never really know how big of an impact it had. Would Brady have thrown an extra INT in the first half? Would a receiver have dropped a vital 3rd down catch? Would the RB have fumbled? If the Colts were tied or up due to one of those potential issues in the first half would it have changed the mentality for the players in the second half?

I don't know how much of an advantage the deflated ball provided but obviously a big enough one to go through with it if they did in fact cheat.

Quote:
2.) I heard on the radio that the officials discovered the issue at halftime. The game was relatively close at that point and the Pats blew it open in the second half. I'm assuming, perhaps incorrectly, that once the officials discovered the footballs were under-inflated they had the problem corrected, which should mean the Patriots didn't have whatever advantage that provides in the second half... when they blew the game wide open.


Well, the officials also checked the balls before the game started and are supposed to hold them until the ball boys get them before the game. In other words, if they were able to deflate them before they game they could have done so again before the half. The only reason anybody on the Colts even noticed was because the ball was intercepted and reported at that time. Since there wasn't another interception, it's hard telling if the problem was actually corrected or not since we don't know how or when they were tampered with in the first place.

Do you know if they tested the balls again after the game or kept a closer eye on it after half time? That'd be interesting information to know.

In any case, beating a team by 10 points going into the half when you get the ball back in the 3rd is a pretty big advantage even if it's not huge relative to the beating that was the final result.

Quote:
My main question is if this is a significant issue, and if under-inflating footballs can provide what the league considers a significant advantage, why the heck do the teams have anything to do with it at all? If it's supposed to be standardized it should be left out of their hands altogether and this shouldn't even be possible.


Under-inflating and over-inflating both seem like they can provide significant advantages so I'm not sure why it's not more heavily controlled. Perhaps they thought the current controls were sufficient. Under-inflating would be good in situations where the ball might become slick and/or hard (rain/cold). Over-inflating is good for kicking. Hence; the Patriots made sure to keep one ball inflated properly.

I agree with the idea that the officials should provide the balls. On top of that I would say that balls shouldn't be team specific.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:06 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
I don't recall being outraged about any of that stuff. I generally think it's funny. In this case though, I don't think it's really on the patriots. If they did cheat, it's the leagues fault for letting them.


You might not have been outraged, but a *lot* of the league and fans get in a pretty big uproar over that stuff.

So does this 'cheating is OK if the organization you're cheating on didn't know to stop you' extend to every part of life or just football? ;)

The NFL didn't let them on purpose, they do have rules regulating the balls. In this case, a team cheated to get around them.

Quote:
There is no reason that the footballs shouldn't be handled by the league(headsets too, we've heard those complaints enough as well). It literally takes less than 15 seconds to check ball pressure with a gauge that can fit in the refs pocket.


And maybe something like that will happen now.

Quote:
Also, as someone has posted(don't remember who), you can easily lose 20% of pressure on a cold day. Refs/guys holding the down markers/some other guys should just take responsibility and handle it. The nfl can afford to pay someone impartial to do it.



You *can* lose up to 20% on a cold day. Note the word 'can' instead of the phrasing 'most of the time'. If it was 'most of the time a ball deflates 20% on a cold day' then it would be a valid excuse. In this case, 11 out of 12 balls were deflated even though the Refs checked them about 2 hours before the game.

That's not one (or even two) of the balls being deflated by the cold, that's very likely tampering.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:12 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Another question I ask myself; what else has New England cheated at that we simply don't know about? If they've been busted cheating twice now, how many other things are they doing against the rules that just haven't been found?

How would I feel if it was the Vikings that lost the Championship game only to find later that the other team cheated in some way? Would I still have the 'Aw well, we probably would have lost anyway!' mentality?

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:29 am
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
So does this 'cheating is OK if the organization you're cheating on didn't know to stop you' extend to every part of life or just football? ;)

The nfl does know and even has stipulations in place to handle the ball pressure. Doesn't sound like it's very stringent or even payed attention too. As I mentioned with the headsets and people piping in crowd noise, we already know it happens and everybody deals with it. Based on comments from Rodgers and others, it sounds like ball inflating/deflating happens pretty regularly too. Either let it slide, or the league needs to do it on their own, not fake outrage when they know it's been happening this whole time.

I don't condone cheating, but I have a hard time getting upset about ball pressure as that seems so minor. Standardize it or let the home team do it on their own. The nfl seems to have chosen the 2nd option and is now faking outrage like they had no idea.

As a db, is grabbing the receiver against the rules? What about holding as a lineman? Bumping/grabbing/holding is all over the place, but it's up to the ref to call it. It's also up to the ref to ensure the ball is correct along with the clock, down markers etc. I have a hard time holding a team responsible for something that is the referees responsibility.

Quote:
You *can* lose up to 20% on a cold day. Note the word 'can' instead of the phrasing 'most of the time'. If it was 'most of the time a ball deflates 20% on a cold day' then it would be a valid excuse. In this case, 11 out of 12 balls were deflated even though the Refs checked them about 2 hours before the game.

That's not one (or even two) of the balls being deflated by the cold, that's very likely tampering.

Read this article if you want to get into the math: http://www.wcsh6.com/story/weather/2015 ... /22065861/
The balls are supposed to be 12.5-13.5 PSI before the game starts. If all balls were filled indoors at the low end of 12.5, they could all easily be under the limit at half time.

Quote:
How would I feel if it was the Vikings that lost the Championship game only to find later that the other team cheated in some way? Would I still have the 'Aw well, we probably would have lost anyway!' mentality?

I wouldn't blame it on deflated balls, that seems like a total cop out, especially when you get blown out.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:33 am
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Fill 11 of the balls at 12.6 indoors. Fill 1 designated kicking ball at 13.4. Keep the kicking ball warm so it doesn't lose pressure. Everything is within range to start the game, but the 11 will all end up under on a cold day.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:41 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 4016
Location: So. Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
If they cheated, they cheated. Whether or not it had an outcome on the game is irrelevant. It's all about intent and integrity.

Look at this teams history going back to the snow plow game. :rofl:

It's in their blood up there.

I don't know how much integrity is left in the NFL, but the Patriots continually blurr the line compared to other franchises.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:46 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 4016
Location: So. Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
Fill 11 of the balls at 12.6 indoors. Fill 1 designated kicking ball at 13.4. Keep the kicking ball warm so it doesn't lose pressure. Everything is within range to start the game, but the 11 will all end up under on a cold day.


I thought there was a separate set of kicking balls.....like 5 other balls or something. no?


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:47 am
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
The Breeze wrote:
I thought there was a separate set of kicking balls.....like 5 other balls or something. no?

Yeah, I guess there is eight designated kicking balls. Kinda weird that kicking ones are separate and shipped straight from manufacturer. Guess they could do that with all of them.
Quote:
"Each team will make 12 primary balls available for testing by the Referee two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game to meet League requirements," according to the NFL rule book. "The home team will also make 12 backup balls available for testing in all stadiums. In addition, the visitors, at their discretion, may bring 12 backup balls to be tested by the Referee for games held in outdoor stadiums. For all games, eight new footballs, sealed in a special box and shipped by the manufacturer to the Referee, will be opened in the officials’ locker room two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game. These balls are to be specially marked by the Referee and used exclusively for the kicking game."

Maybe the patriots did have some random guy deflating balls on the sidelines, but at the end of the day, you still need to play defense. You give up 45 points, and it's not due to ball pressure.


Last edited by Crax on Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:51 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
If the balls were properly inflated for the Colts then that would make the Patriot's defensive job a bit easier too, no? If a deflated ball is easier for the QB to grip and for the WR to catch, then on the other side of that coin a fully inflated ball is more difficult for the QB to handle and the WR to catch (especially in the kind of weather in that game).


I think I'm missing your point. The NE defense wouldn't have a competitive advantage over the Colts offense in that circumstance so if the Colts offense was using properly-inflated footballs, how would that make things easier on the Patriots defense? Wouldn't it just mean they were facing the circumstances they were supposed to be facing?

Quote:
Well, the officials also checked the balls before the game started and are supposed to hold them until the ball boys get them before the game. In other words, if they were able to deflate them before they game they could have done so again before the half. The only reason anybody on the Colts even noticed was because the ball was intercepted and reported at that time. Since there wasn't another interception, it's hard telling if the problem was actually corrected or not since we don't know how or when they were tampered with in the first place.

Do you know if they tested the balls again after the game or kept a closer eye on it after half time? That'd be interesting information to know.


I don't know. The officials handle the ball after every play so presumably, if they knew there was an issue at halftime, they would have been looking for it in the second half. Hopefully, more info on that will come out...

Quote:
In any case, beating a team by 10 points going into the half when you get the ball back in the 3rd is a pretty big advantage even if it's not huge relative to the beating that was the final result.


Point taken but I find it very difficult to believe that under-inflated footballs had much, if anything, to do with that advantage, especially because I saw the Pats beating the Colts at the line for the majority of the game. If the Patriots were cheating, I don't know why they bothered. Maybe it's a compulsion Belichick can't resist or something because I just don't think they need that kind of "help" and the risk doesn't seem worth whatever slight reward it might provide.

Quote:
Under-inflating and over-inflating both seem like they can provide significant advantages so I'm not sure why it's not more heavily controlled. Perhaps they thought the current controls were sufficient. Under-inflating would be good in situations where the ball might become slick and/or hard (rain/cold). Over-inflating is good for kicking. Hence; the Patriots made sure to keep one ball inflated properly.

I agree with the idea that the officials should provide the balls. On top of that I would say that balls shouldn't be team specific.


Agreed. It's crazy that the NFL has practically been doing this on the "honor system".


Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:56 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
The nfl does know and even has stipulations in place to handle the ball pressure. Doesn't sound like it's very stringent or even payed attention too. As I mentioned with the headsets and people piping in crowd noise, we already know it happens and everybody deals with it. Based on comments from Rodgers and others, it sounds like ball inflating/deflating happens pretty regularly too. Either let it slide, or the league needs to do it on their own, not fake outrage when they know it's been happening this whole time.

I don't condone cheating, but I have a hard time getting upset about ball pressure as that seems so minor. Standardize it or let the home team do it on their own. The nfl seems to have chosen the 2nd option and is now faking outrage like they had no idea.

As a db, is grabbing the receiver against the rules? What about holding as a lineman? Bumping/grabbing/holding is all over the place, but it's up to the ref to call it. It's also up to the ref to ensure the ball is correct along with the clock, down markers etc. I have a hard time holding a team responsible for something that is the referees responsibility.


So if the Patriots win the super bowl this year and we later find out that the entire team (even the kicker!) was doping it wouldn't matter. It's up to the league to make sure players aren't using enhancing drugs and if they got around that; it's on the league.

Quote:
Read this article if you want to get into the math: http://www.wcsh6.com/story/weather/2015 ... /22065861/
The balls are supposed to be 12.5-13.5 PSI before the game starts. If all balls were filled indoors at the low end of 12.5, they could all easily be under the limit at half time.


Well, first I'll have to admit I don't know what the balls were down too when they were low. If they were all at 12.4 PSI then obviously it's all much ado about nothing. However, assuming that all of the balls were filled at the low end and they all lost air (except conveniently one ball that the team would need for kicks) seems like wishful thinking a bit.

Quote:
I wouldn't blame it on deflated balls, that seems like a total cop out, especially when you get blown out.


I wouldn't blame it all on deflated balls either (I watched the game and know that wasn't the only reason) ... but it'd leave a pretty bad taste in my mouth.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:06 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
Fill 11 of the balls at 12.6 indoors. Fill 1 designated kicking ball at 13.4. Keep the kicking ball warm so it doesn't lose pressure. Everything is within range to start the game, but the 11 will all end up under on a cold day.


And yet the same cold didn't impact the Colts balls at all. But impacted 91% of the Patriots balls.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:07 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
Crax wrote:
Fill 11 of the balls at 12.6 indoors. Fill 1 designated kicking ball at 13.4. Keep the kicking ball warm so it doesn't lose pressure. Everything is within range to start the game, but the 11 will all end up under on a cold day.


And yet the same cold didn't impact the Colts balls at all. But impacted 91% of the Patriots balls.

Fill all the colts at max acceptable pressure before game? I haven't head anything related to the actual levels. Were the ones that were under like 11.5? 9? 12.2? How much under is under?


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:09 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Mothman wrote:
I think I'm missing your point. The NE defense wouldn't have a competitive advantage over the Colts offense in that circumstance so if the Colts offense was using properly-inflated footballs, how would that make things easier on the Patriots defense? Wouldn't it just mean they were facing the circumstances they were supposed to be facing?


The NE defense would have a competitive advantage compared to the Colts defense. So while the Patriots could more easily complete a pass with a partially deflated ball (a black mark on the Colts defense) the Colts receiver may have dropped the same pass or perhaps Luck wouldn't have been able to throw it properly in the first place. In other words, Tom Brady's passing stats might look more like Luck's and the Colt's defense might have looked equally as impressive as the Patriots.

Again, I'm not saying that 100% would have happened, just that cheating leaves the possibility open.


Quote:
Point taken but I find it very difficult to believe that under-inflated footballs had much, if anything, to do with that advantage, especially because I saw the Pats beating the Colts at the line for the majority of the game. If the Patriots were cheating, I don't know why they bothered. Maybe it's a compulsion Belichick can't resist or something because I just don't think they need that kind of "help" and the risk doesn't seem worth whatever slight reward it might provide.


As it turns out, no, they didn't need to cheat, but they didn't know to start the game they didn't need to.

I guess the cheating just doesn't sit well with me even though it likely didn't alter this particular game. Would it be a bigger problem if the game had been closer?

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:13 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
Cliff wrote:
Crax wrote:
Fill 11 of the balls at 12.6 indoors. Fill 1 designated kicking ball at 13.4. Keep the kicking ball warm so it doesn't lose pressure. Everything is within range to start the game, but the 11 will all end up under on a cold day.


And yet the same cold didn't impact the Colts balls at all. But impacted 91% of the Patriots balls.

Fill all the colts at max acceptable pressure before game? I haven't head anything related to the actual levels. Were the ones that were under like 11.5? 9? 12.2? How much under is under?


I would like to know that as well. Just how much under regulation were they?

I'll say this much; it was noticeable enough that the Colt's player that intercepted the ball noticed right away and reported it.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:16 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
I'll say this much; it was noticeable enough that the Colt's player that intercepted the ball noticed right away and reported it.

The refs handle the balls before and after every snap. If it was really bad, shouldn't the refs have noticed it already? I have a hard time believing it was some huge advantage. I hate playing with overinflated footballs, but under aren't great either.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:19 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
Cliff wrote:
I'll say this much; it was noticeable enough that the Colt's player that intercepted the ball noticed right away and reported it.

The refs handle the balls before and after every snap. If it was really bad, shouldn't the refs have noticed it already? I have a hard time believing it was some huge advantage. I hate playing with overinflated footballs, but under aren't great either.


Under-inflating balls for an advantage isn't unprecedented. Other teams (at least in the collage ranks) have been caught doing it before too and there's a reason they have regulations for it in place.

As far as the refs not knowing - good questions. Perhaps they're just not gripping them as hard as the players do?

I also found the answer to how deflated they were; 2lbs per square inch. Honestly though, I don't know what that means exactly. So 10.6 PSI instead of 12.6?

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:23 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1751
Location: Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
As far as the refs not knowing - good questions. Perhaps they're just not gripping them as hard as the players do?
I also found the answer to how deflated they were; 2lbs per square inch. Honestly though, I don't know what that means exactly. So 10.6 PSI instead of 12.6?

Well, the regulation is 12.5-13.5 PSI, so I guess 10.5 PSI? All 11 were exactly the same though?


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:31 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 17768
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
I didn't read the other replies yet, but don't they rotate the balls in and out all game? So wouldn't Indy have been able to play with the underinflated balls too?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2016‬


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:31 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Cliff wrote:
Mothman wrote:
I think I'm missing your point. The NE defense wouldn't have a competitive advantage over the Colts offense in that circumstance so if the Colts offense was using properly-inflated footballs, how would that make things easier on the Patriots defense? Wouldn't it just mean they were facing the circumstances they were supposed to be facing?


The NE defense would have a competitive advantage compared to the Colts defense. So while the Patriots could more easily complete a pass with a partially deflated ball (a black mark on the Colts defense) the Colts receiver may have dropped the same pass or perhaps Luck wouldn't have been able to throw it properly in the first place. In other words, Tom Brady's passing stats might look more like Luck's and the Colt's defense might have looked equally as impressive as the Patriots.

Again, I'm not saying that 100% would have happened, just that cheating leaves the possibility open.


I see what you mean now but it seems to me the only real advantage would have been to the NE offense. Their defense gained no advantage over the Colts offense. I understand your point about an uneven playing field but in the end, that really just points back to NE's offense.

Quote:
As it turns out, no, they didn't need to cheat, but they didn't know to start the game they didn't need to.


I meant it in a larger sense: I doubt that team has ever really needed to cheat.

Quote:
I guess the cheating just doesn't sit well with me even though it likely didn't alter this particular game. Would it be a bigger problem if the game had been closer?


I just have a hard time believing under-inflated footballs (but not so under-inflated that it was easily noticed) make all that much difference to pro players. I'm not condoning cheating, if that's what happened. It doesn't sit well with me either. As I said, If it's determined that the Patriots cheated they should face appropriate consequences. It will be interesting to get the full story... if it was intentional, who did it and who (if anyone) ordered it done?


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:32 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Crax wrote:
Cliff wrote:
As far as the refs not knowing - good questions. Perhaps they're just not gripping them as hard as the players do?
I also found the answer to how deflated they were; 2lbs per square inch. Honestly though, I don't know what that means exactly. So 10.6 PSI instead of 12.6?

Well, the regulation is 12.5-13.5 PSI, so I guess 10.5 PSI? All 11 were exactly the same though?


Yes, they were all the same according to an article I found;

Quote:
Last night’s bombshell from Chris Mortensen of ESPN — that 11 of 12 Patriots footballs from Sunday’s AFC title game were underinflated by two pounds per square inch of pressure — has pushed #Deflategate to new heights, causing many to presume that these measurements mean that the Patriots deliberately deflated the balls.


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... flategate/

The article also raises your question about the refs. It brings up other interesting questions too.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:33 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Mothman wrote:
I just have a hard time believing under-inflated footballs (but not so under-inflated that it was easily noticed) make all that much difference to pro players. I'm not condoning cheating, if that's what happened. It doesn't sit well with me either. As I said, If it's determined that the Patriots cheated they should face appropriate consequences. It will be interesting to get the full story... if it was intentional, who did it and who (if anyone) ordered it done?


I don't know what difference it might make. If they did it on purpose though, apparently a significant enough one.

How easy it was to determine is open for debate. All we know is that the refs didn't notice or say anything ... but they aren't taking hundreds of reps with a properly filled football all week every week during the season.

Technically, the first time a non-New England player or ref touched the ball it was noticed ...

I'm guessing even if it proves true we won't know if it was ordered or not.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:37 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: The Great White North
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Where there's smoke, there's fire. Cheating allegations come up way too frequently around Belichek for this to be just another innocent mistake IMHO, but it deserves investigation.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:39 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 4016
Location: So. Utah
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
VikingLord wrote:
Where there's smoke, there's fire. Cheating allegations come up way too frequently around Belichek for this to be just another innocent mistake IMHO, but it deserves investigation.



I agree.

I don't think air pressure creates wins.....it creates favorable opportunities, I guess. It doesn't create 140+yds and 3 tds for Blount either.

I don't know what you can do for this game as far as current rules go, but when players get caught doing something to give them a competitive edge(PEDS) they get suspended.

If anything should come from this I hope it's some consistent penalty for this kind of tactic, circumventing agreed upon rules in order to gain a competitive advantage. I think part of what might embolden a team to doing something of this nature, and there could be many teams having done it, is that there is no real punishment prescribed for the spirit of the infraction.

I think I read that messing with the ball is a $25,000 fine? That needs to be changed if true.

There's a fine line between gamesmanship and cheating. IMO ,cheating should be heavily penalized regardless of how effective the cheat is.


Wed Jan 21, 2015 1:18 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:30 pm
Posts: 2156
Location: Minneapolis
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
Brad Johnson bribed people to doctor balls for the Super Bowl


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Stop being a hypocrite


Wed Jan 21, 2015 1:50 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8058
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: More New England Cheating?
frosted wrote:
Brad Johnson bribed people to doctor balls for the Super Bowl

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Are there rules against scuffing up the ball? If so, I'm no more fond of that. He played with an advantage the other team didn't have an opportunity to duplicate. If it's not against the rules and the other team simply didn't want to do the same thing, I feel that's different from this situation.

There are specific rules for ball air pressure and I think it's fair to assume the Colts would have changed the ball to be more friendly to their offense in those conditions if adjusting it were allowed.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Wed Jan 21, 2015 1:56 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 170 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.