King James wrote:All 3 of them were nobodies but as soon as they told world, "I'm gay!! I'm gay," they get put on the spotlight.
It doesn't matter who the person is. The "first X player to play in the X league" is always going to get coverage. I imagine there were a few stories about Jackie Robinson in various news outlets when he became the first African American professional baseball player. I don't see how you really fault the guy. SOMEBODY was going to be the first. And that somebody doesn't necessarily have to be a media-hounding diva. I guarantee a guy like T.O. or Chad "Ocho Cinco" will have been considered much more media-centric than Sam will ever be.
Darren Young wasn't really being utilized on WWE. He was constantly jobbing (in wrestling terms, his character is scripted to lose) and when he came out, they start promoting him like he's one of the top entertainers in the company. Not because of his wrestling ability because he announced he was gay.
Uh, maybe because it's a STORYLINE? Please don't compare WWE to the NFL. And are you really blaming Darren Young for something that was clearly out of his control (the story creators obviously determined this would draw media attention and crafted a more prominent role). You understand that, right?
Michael Sam- He's going to be the same way. Some team is going to reach on him just to show everybody that they accept the gay community.
Ha! That's absurd. No GM is going to sign the guy
just because he's gay. Again, there's too much riding on their jobs to take a player based on something other than what they (and their scouting department) evaluate as a player. He's going to be selected as a football player first, as he should be.
Don't blame our founding fathers for that, it was a young country back then and the thing about the government is that we have or had the power as citizens to vote on laws we didn't like.
Don't blame them for owning slaves?
Oooookay. I guess they had to own other humans. It was just "the way."
nd the thing about the government is that we have or had the power as citizens to vote on laws we didn't like.
Like repealing DOMA?
I made the comment about this not being the country our founder father's built because we are losing our voice as citizens.
Um...disagree. There's never been more ways and opportunities to voice your opinions.
It has gotten to the point now that you can't voice your disapproval of something without being looked down upon as a bigot. It's basically accept gays or you're a bad person now.
Well the definition of a bigot is a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc./ a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group.