View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:07 pm



Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Nice story on Boise St. QB 
Author Message
Online
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 23166
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Nice story on Boise St. QB
Quote:
Moore has thrown for 14,374 yards and 140 touchdowns in his Broncos career. But there are only two numbers that matter. If Moore leads Boise State past Arizona State, he will have won 50 games as a starting quarterback, smashing the record of 45 that Colt McCoy set at Texas (2006-09).


http://espn.go.com/college-football/bow ... hes-career

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:29 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 9:44 pm
Posts: 10851
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
dead_poet wrote:
Quote:
Moore has thrown for 14,374 yards and 140 touchdowns in his Broncos career. But there are only two numbers that matter. If Moore leads Boise State past Arizona State, he will have won 50 games as a starting quarterback, smashing the record of 45 that Colt McCoy set at Texas (2006-09).


http://espn.go.com/college-football/bow ... hes-career


I'm not generally a Boise-basher, but in this case I will. While it's true that some of that 50 is against some tough competition (including Georgia and TCU this year), there are a ton of easy wins in there, especially compared to what McCoy faced in the Big 12.


Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:14 am
Profile
Practice Squad
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 2:33 pm
Posts: 12
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
I'm from Boise and i have had this debate over and over again. I do not think Moore is anything compared to Luck, Jones, or Griffin. But the one thing you have to realize about his stats is that majority of his games he played one or maybe two series in the fourth or didn't play the fourth at all. Now imagin if he got to play every quarter his stats would be off the charts. His stats care skewed because of his opponents but only three schools scouted him and look at what he did from that. Moore is technically sound and very smart. Yes he lacks some of the physical tools that would make him a higher pick. I see him bein a career backup maybe getting a few chances here and there.


Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:17 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 1726
Location: Utah
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
I'd give Moore a shot, not anywhere near the early rounds, but towards the end or a FA. I think he could be a decent backup QB.


Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:44 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:55 am
Posts: 8815
Location: Way Up North
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Crax wrote:
I'd give Moore a shot, not anywhere near the early rounds, but towards the end or a FA. I think he could be a decent backup QB.



Im not familiar with him at all, but they were discussing him on ESPN the other day, said he will probably be the steal of the draft. They thought he would have the potential to perform as well as any QB in this draft, while being selected late (5-7th round).


Fri Dec 30, 2011 2:37 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Waste of a pick. But he's a midget with questionable arm strength so apparently he's exactly what this team would want in a quarterback.


Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:58 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10511
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
What about the kid from Houston that broke all the records this year, Keenum? I know it's the system he's in but he might be worth a flier if he's projected as a late rounder.


Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:16 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:55 am
Posts: 8815
Location: Way Up North
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
Waste of a pick. But he's a midget with questionable arm strength so apparently he's exactly what this team would want in a quarterback.



Im sure the Vikings can just order up an Aaron Rodgers, or Brees. But I doubt you'd want either of them on the Vikings anyways, Rodgers is only 6-2, but he was drafted in the 20s, WAY too late in the 1st round to find a good player, he is just a "leftover". And Brees is just too short to play, period.


Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:29 pm
Profile
Backup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:43 am
Posts: 74
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
S197 wrote:
What about the kid from Houston that broke all the records this year, Keenum? I know it's the system he's in but he might be worth a flier if he's projected as a late rounder.


If he's still around in the 7th he may be worth a shot, but he reminds me a lot of Graham Harrell from Texas Tech, who is on the Packers now. Gaudy stats but was in a spread offense that threw the ball almost every down. He also tore his ACL week 1 last year and this year was his sixth year of eligibility thanks to a medical redshirt.

_________________
Morris Claiborne looks good in purple and yellow.


Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:43 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
purple guy wrote:
Demi wrote:
Waste of a pick. But he's a midget with questionable arm strength so apparently he's exactly what this team would want in a quarterback.



Im sure the Vikings can just order up an Aaron Rodgers, or Brees. But I doubt you'd want either of them on the Vikings anyways, Rodgers is only 6-2, but he was drafted in the 20s, WAY too late in the 1st round to find a good player, he is just a "leftover". And Brees is just too short to play, period.


Cling to your two examples. I'll stick with the two dozen other successful QBs over 6'2. Maybe go to a casino and bet on those odds while you're at it. We'll see who's up more at the end of the night. :lol:


Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:52 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:55 am
Posts: 8815
Location: Way Up North
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
purple guy wrote:
Demi wrote:
Waste of a pick. But he's a midget with questionable arm strength so apparently he's exactly what this team would want in a quarterback.



Im sure the Vikings can just order up an Aaron Rodgers, or Brees. But I doubt you'd want either of them on the Vikings anyways, Rodgers is only 6-2, but he was drafted in the 20s, WAY too late in the 1st round to find a good player, he is just a "leftover". And Brees is just too short to play, period.


Cling to your two examples. I'll stick with the two dozen other successful QBs over 6'2. Maybe go to a casino and bet on those odds while you're at it. We'll see who's up more at the end of the night. :lol:



Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think. Who cares if a DB can cover, as long as he can tackle, draft him. Who cares if a QB cant play, if he is tall, he is in! Makes perfect sense.


Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:12 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Quote:
Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think


huh? No, they haven't drafted or acquired a QB other than Webb (WR Webb!) over 6'2 since Childress was hired. So clearly it doesn't.

And the whole idea is the same as a tackling corner. You get a corner who is quick and explosive enough and work on what you can. You draft a QB who has the physical attributes and try and coach them along with their abilities. You don't bring in tackling corners and midget QBs and expect to have any success....


Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:19 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:55 am
Posts: 8815
Location: Way Up North
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
Quote:
Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think


huh? No, they haven't drafted or acquired a QB other than Webb (WR Webb!) over 6'2 since Childress was hired. So clearly it doesn't.

And the whole idea is the same as a tackling corner. You get a corner who is quick and explosive enough and work on what you can. You draft a QB who has the physical attributes and try and coach them along with their abilities. You don't bring in tackling corners and midget QBs and expect to have any success....



Yea, right. Got it. :wink:


Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:16 pm
Profile
Franchise Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 465
Location: St.Francis Minnesota
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
Quote:
Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think


huh? No, they haven't drafted or acquired a QB other than Webb (WR Webb!) over 6'2 since Childress was hired. So clearly it doesn't.

And the whole idea is the same as a tackling corner. You get a corner who is quick and explosive enough and work on what you can. You draft a QB who has the physical attributes and try and coach them along with their abilities. You don't bring in tackling corners and midget QBs and expect to have any success....



Drew Bree's 6'2
Michael Vick 6'0
Aaron Rodgers 6'2

Height isn't a necessity

_________________
The term fan comes from FANatic or fanatical.


Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:29 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Mercy Percy wrote:
Demi wrote:
Quote:
Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think


huh? No, they haven't drafted or acquired a QB other than Webb (WR Webb!) over 6'2 since Childress was hired. So clearly it doesn't.

And the whole idea is the same as a tackling corner. You get a corner who is quick and explosive enough and work on what you can. You draft a QB who has the physical attributes and try and coach them along with their abilities. You don't bring in tackling corners and midget QBs and expect to have any success....



Drew Bree's 6'2
Michael Vick 6'0
Aaron Rodgers 6'2

Height isn't a necessity


Of course it isn't. The only necessity is that you're capable of throwing the ball. But for every one shorter QB you name that had some meaningful success, I can name a half dozen that were closer to 6'4. And if you're going to go with a QB, you shouldn't pick one based on "Well, in this rare case they had success", you try and minimize as much as you can. And it's clear being a taller QB has certain advantages.


Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:46 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10511
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Moore will be on the North squad for the Senior Bowl, which will be coached by the Vikings.


Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:53 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 217
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
Quote:
Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think


huh? No, they haven't drafted or acquired a QB other than Webb (WR Webb!) over 6'2 since Childress was hired. So clearly it doesn't.

And the whole idea is the same as a tackling corner. You get a corner who is quick and explosive enough and work on what you can. You draft a QB who has the physical attributes and try and coach them along with their abilities. You don't bring in tackling corners and midget QBs and expect to have any success....

You might stand corrected.
They acquired Sage Rosenfels is 6-4 224 and that height helps him see better from the bench so that he can see the field.

_________________
I am a very proud father of a very brave marine!


Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:50 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
bpviking wrote:
Demi wrote:
Quote:
Good thing youre not in charge of the Vikings drafting. Height being your biggest concern for a QB meshes with how the Vikings think


huh? No, they haven't drafted or acquired a QB other than Webb (WR Webb!) over 6'2 since Childress was hired. So clearly it doesn't.

And the whole idea is the same as a tackling corner. You get a corner who is quick and explosive enough and work on what you can. You draft a QB who has the physical attributes and try and coach them along with their abilities. You don't bring in tackling corners and midget QBs and expect to have any success....

You might stand corrected.
They acquired Sage Rosenfels is 6-4 224 and that height helps him see better from the bench so that he can see the field.


yeah, Ponder will have to stand on his tippy toes once he gets hurt again...and again...and again. :lol:


Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:38 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 217
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
You are probably right, that scrawny 6-2 229 pound Ponder is way too small to play in the NFL. But just to name a few starting NFL qbs Brees 6-0 , Rogers 6-2, Stafford 6-2, Romo 6-2, Vick 6-0, Fitzpatrick 6-2, Dalton 6-2, Grossman 6-1.
But there are, true enough ,several other qbs in the league that are 6-3 or taller but I think over time the one to maybe three inch difference does not matter ALL that much.
Let's not even discuss Montana 6-2, Favre 6-2 , Steve young 6-2, or Tarkenton 5-11, Starr 6-0, Unitas 6-2 because we all know that they also were "midgets" that could never succeed in the NFL :lol:
Yep, what a Puss....He gets a little hip pointer and although he plays with it (which most players probably would not, especially mobile qbs) and a concussion ( I remember the hit which a lot of qbs would not have even been phased by it let alone keep playing) :roll:
Yeah he is quite the "china doll"! Especially playing behind that fortress of a o-line the Vikes protect qbs with (he has maybe 2 seconds to throw the ball before taking hit after hit). :lol:

Note:
What Is A Hip Pointer Injury?

A hip pointer injury is an extremely painful, acute injury to the iliac crest of the pelvis. The injury causes bleeding into the abdominal muscles, which attach to the iliac crest. The bone and overlying muscle are often bruised, and the pain can be intense. Pain may be felt when walking, laughing, coughing, or even breathing deeplyNote:

_________________
I am a very proud father of a very brave marine!


Last edited by bpviking on Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:23 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 4016
Location: So. Utah
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
just cause i'm bored:

Bradshaw 6 3............................ Favre 6 2

K. Stewart 6 1........................... Rodgers 6 2

Rothlesburger 6 5........................ Dickey 6 3

Batch 6 2 ................................... Starr 6 1

Sipe 6 1.................................... Stafford 6 2

Kosar 6 5................................... Ferotte 6 3

K Anderson 6 2 ......................... Peete 6 0

Esiason 6 5............................... Landry 6 4

Palmer 6 5................................ Danielson 6 2

Dalton 6 2................................. Harbaugh 6 3

McNair 6 2 ................................... Tomczak 6 1

Flacco 6 6............................McMahon 6 1

Plunkett 6 3............................. Luckman 6 0

Grogan 6 4................................. Tarkenton 6 0

Eason 6 4................................ W. Wilson 6 3

Bledsoe 6 5............................... Kramer 6 2

Brady 6 4.................................. Moon 6 3

Cassel 6 5................................... Culpepper 6 4

Namath 6 2.......................... Kapp 6 2

Pennington 6 3............................ Cunningham 6 4

Sanchez 6 2.............................. Young 6 2

Testaverde 6 5............................. Montana 6 2

N. O Donnell 6 3.............................. Garcia 6 1

K. Obrien 6 4.................................. Brodie 6 1

J. Todd 6 2 .................................. Title 6 0

E Morrall 6 1.................................. DeBerg 6 3

Griese 6 1................................. Bradford 6 4

Marino 6 4 ................................... Bulger 6 3

Strock 6 5........................................ Warner 6 2

J Ferguson 6 1.................................... Everett 6 5

Ferragamo 6 3............................ J.Kemp 6 0

Kelly 6 3................................... Haden 5 11

K Collins 6 4................................ Gabriel 6 5

Fitzpatrick 6 2............................... Van Brocklin 6 1

Schaub 6 5................................... Lomax 6 3

Carr 6 3......................................... Hart 6 1

Garrrard 6 1...................................... Beuerlein 6 3

Leftwich 6 5.............................. Kitna 6 2

Brunell 6 1.................................. Zorn 6 2

P Manning 6 5............................... Romo 6 2

Unitas 6 1..................................... aikman 6 4

George 6 4................................. D White 6 2

B Jones 6 3 ................................... Staubach 6 3

Blanda 6 2..................................... Meredith 6 3

Pastorini 6 2............................... E Manning 6 4

Hasselback 6 4............................... P. Simms 6 3

Dawson 6 0...................................... Thiesman 6 0

T. Green 6 3...................................... Jurgenson 5 11

Grbac 6 5 .........................................Kilmer 6 0

D. Krieg 6 1..................................... Baugh 6 2

Fouts 6 3 ...................................... B. Johnson 6 5

Humphries 6 2......................................Rypien 6 4

Brees 6 0........................................ McNabb 6 2

Rivers 6 5.......................................Vick 6 0

Lamonica 6 3.................................... Jaworski 6 2

Stabler 6 3....................................... Ryan 6 5

Hostetler 6 3..................................... Chandler 6 4

Gannon 6 3...................................... Hebert 6 4

Morton 6 4...................................... Bartkowski 6 4

Elway 6 3.......................................Webb 6 4

Cutler 6 3....................................... A Manning 6 3

Plummer 6 2................................. Tolliver 6 1.............Ponder 6 2




If I did my math right....this averages to 6 1 and a half for these 125 QBs


Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:43 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
The Breeze wrote:
If I did my math right....this averages to 6 1 and a half for these 125 QBs


:rofl: You really were bored!


Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:40 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 217
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
The Breeze wrote:
just cause i'm bored:

Bradshaw 6 3............................ Favre 6 2

K. Stewart 6 1........................... Rodgers 6 2

Rothlesburger 6 5........................ Dickey 6 3

Batch 6 2 ................................... Starr 6 1

Sipe 6 1.................................... Stafford 6 2

Kosar 6 5................................... Ferotte 6 3

K Anderson 6 2 ......................... Peete 6 0

Esiason 6 5............................... Landry 6 4

Palmer 6 5................................ Danielson 6 2

Dalton 6 2................................. Harbaugh 6 3

McNair 6 2 ................................... Tomczak 6 1

Flacco 6 6............................McMahon 6 1

Plunkett 6 3............................. Luckman 6 0

Grogan 6 4................................. Tarkenton 6 0

Eason 6 4................................ W. Wilson 6 3

Bledsoe 6 5............................... Kramer 6 2

Brady 6 4.................................. Moon 6 3

Cassel 6 5................................... Culpepper 6 4

Namath 6 2.......................... Kapp 6 2

Pennington 6 3............................ Cunningham 6 4

Sanchez 6 2.............................. Young 6 2

Testaverde 6 5............................. Montana 6 2

N. O Donnell 6 3.............................. Garcia 6 1

K. Obrien 6 4.................................. Brodie 6 1

J. Todd 6 2 .................................. Title 6 0

E Morrall 6 1.................................. DeBerg 6 3

Griese 6 1................................. Bradford 6 4

Marino 6 4 ................................... Bulger 6 3

Strock 6 5........................................ Warner 6 2

J Ferguson 6 1.................................... Everett 6 5

Ferragamo 6 3............................ J.Kemp 6 0

Kelly 6 3................................... Haden 5 11

K Collins 6 4................................ Gabriel 6 5

Fitzpatrick 6 2............................... Van Brocklin 6 1

Schaub 6 5................................... Lomax 6 3

Carr 6 3......................................... Hart 6 1

Garrrard 6 1...................................... Beuerlein 6 3

Leftwich 6 5.............................. Kitna 6 2

Brunell 6 1.................................. Zorn 6 2

P Manning 6 5............................... Romo 6 2

Unitas 6 1..................................... aikman 6 4

George 6 4................................. D White 6 2

B Jones 6 3 ................................... Staubach 6 3

Blanda 6 2..................................... Meredith 6 3

Pastorini 6 2............................... E Manning 6 4

Hasselback 6 4............................... P. Simms 6 3

Dawson 6 0...................................... Thiesman 6 0

T. Green 6 3...................................... Jurgenson 5 11

Grbac 6 5 .........................................Kilmer 6 0

D. Krieg 6 1..................................... Baugh 6 2

Fouts 6 3 ...................................... B. Johnson 6 5

Humphries 6 2......................................Rypien 6 4

Brees 6 0........................................ McNabb 6 2

Rivers 6 5.......................................Vick 6 0

Lamonica 6 3.................................... Jaworski 6 2

Stabler 6 3....................................... Ryan 6 5

Hostetler 6 3..................................... Chandler 6 4

Gannon 6 3...................................... Hebert 6 4

Morton 6 4...................................... Bartkowski 6 4

Elway 6 3.......................................Webb 6 4

Cutler 6 3....................................... A Manning 6 3

Plummer 6 2................................. Tolliver 6 1.............Ponder 6 2




If I did my math right....this averages to 6 1 and a half for these 125 QBs



Nice "work" :thumbsup:

_________________
I am a very proud father of a very brave marine!


Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:42 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
I also notice no 6 footers in the modern NFL. Why is that? Yet plenty of them decades ago? heck even 6'1 has gone the way of the dodo. Shortest you have now looks to be 6'2. With plenty of 6'5ish guys sprinkled in there. (winning super bowls usually).

Unitas linemen in 1970 were 6'5 and the rest 6'3. How many 6'6...or 6'8 behemoths do quarterbacks now have to deal with? 6'3 seems the norm back then. Now 6'5 is closer to the average size of a starter.

(and to be fair, Stafford and Rodgers specifically look a heck of a lot taller than Ponder!)


Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:29 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 217
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
I also notice no 6 footers in the modern NFL. Why is that? Yet plenty of them decades ago? heck even 6'1 has gone the way of the dodo. Shortest you have now looks to be 6'2. With plenty of 6'5ish guys sprinkled in there. (winning super bowls usually).

Unitas linemen in 1970 were 6'5 and the rest 6'3. How many 6'6...or 6'8 behemoths do quarterbacks now have to deal with? 6'3 seems the norm back then. Now 6'5 is closer to the average size of a starter.

(and to be fair, Stafford and Rodgers specifically look a heck of a lot taller than Ponder!)


I am talking about 6-2 Ponder's size. You know like Favre, Rogers, Stafford, Brees, Vick....I think that these are modern era qbs.
Are you going to tell me that Starr, Unitas, Young, and Montana, Staubach, could not play and be very succesfull in "todays" game :?: :lol:

_________________
I am a very proud father of a very brave marine!


Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:45 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
bpviking wrote:
Demi wrote:
I also notice no 6 footers in the modern NFL. Why is that? Yet plenty of them decades ago? heck even 6'1 has gone the way of the dodo. Shortest you have now looks to be 6'2. With plenty of 6'5ish guys sprinkled in there. (winning super bowls usually).

Unitas linemen in 1970 were 6'5 and the rest 6'3. How many 6'6...or 6'8 behemoths do quarterbacks now have to deal with? 6'3 seems the norm back then. Now 6'5 is closer to the average size of a starter.

(and to be fair, Stafford and Rodgers specifically look a heck of a lot taller than Ponder!)


I am talking about 6-2 Ponder's size. You know like Favre, Rogers, Stafford, Brees, Vick....I think that these are modern era qbs.
Are you going to tell me that Starr, Unitas, Young, and Montana, Staubach, could not play and be very succesfull in "todays" game :?: :lol:


No, but I'm going to tell you that being tall is more advantageous to the position than being short. And if I'm going to gamble the future of the team on it, I'm going to do so on someone 6'4~ over someone on the lower end of the spectrum. For every Brees or Rodgers (Vick, Stafford...wow there's a couple winners!) I can name a Roethlisberger, Brady, Manning, Manning.

Next week we'll see 6'6 vs 6'4. And 6'4 vs 6'2 (Rodgers) or 6'4. I rest my case your honor! :rofl:


Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:55 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 217
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Demi wrote:
bpviking wrote:
Demi wrote:
I also notice no 6 footers in the modern NFL. Why is that? Yet plenty of them decades ago? heck even 6'1 has gone the way of the dodo. Shortest you have now looks to be 6'2. With plenty of 6'5ish guys sprinkled in there. (winning super bowls usually).

Unitas linemen in 1970 were 6'5 and the rest 6'3. How many 6'6...or 6'8 behemoths do quarterbacks now have to deal with? 6'3 seems the norm back then. Now 6'5 is closer to the average size of a starter.

(and to be fair, Stafford and Rodgers specifically look a heck of a lot taller than Ponder!)


I am talking about 6-2 Ponder's size. You know like Favre, Rogers, Stafford, Brees, Vick....I think that these are modern era qbs.
Are you going to tell me that Starr, Unitas, Young, and Montana, Staubach, could not play and be very succesfull in "todays" game :?: :lol:


No, but I'm going to tell you that being tall is more advantageous to the position than being short. And if I'm going to gamble the future of the team on it, I'm going to do so on someone 6'4~ over someone on the lower end of the spectrum. For every Brees or Rodgers (Vick, Stafford...wow there's a couple winners!) I can name a Roethlisberger, Brady, Manning, Manning.

Next week we'll see 6'6 vs 6'4. And 6'4 vs 6'2 (Rodgers) or 6'4. I rest my case your honor! :rofl:

Yeah, how did that work out in the Super Bowl last year :?: 6-2 Rogers beating 6-5 Rothlessberger.
This argument is nuts. You love tall QBs and I think that 6-2 QBS are and have been doing quite well. So on my part end of discussion.

_________________
I am a very proud father of a very brave marine!


Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:19 pm
Profile
Commissioner

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Posts: 23761
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Quote:
This argument is nuts. You love tall QBs and I think that 6-2 QBS are and have been doing quite well. So on my part end of discussion.


6-2 QBs? What 6-2 QBs? I don't see any left. :twisted:


Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:31 pm
Profile
Online
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 23166
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Height plays a part. No 5'10" guys are going to be NFL signal-callers. But there are SO many more important aspects to being a successful NFL quarterback. Is it an advantage? Yes. Is it the sole factor? Hardly. Other skills, strengths and intangibles play far more into it than height. Other factors will make or break Ponder. I sincerely wish height was the biggest problem he faced.

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:35 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 4016
Location: So. Utah
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
I think, as far as eras go, that the real difference in player height is along the lines.Especially offensive line.

There were several QBs of very marginal talent that were over 6 3 and there were not many at all under 6 0 good or bad.

The only real thing I saw was that if a QB was good it didn't matter that much how tall he was. The taller QBs seem to lack a little in the quickness of foot department, while the smaller QBs seemed to use their feet more to make plays.

I think, in the end that a tall QB (6 4 or better) has some advantages if they are a good QB to begin with. Their height isn't what makes them better.....regardless of the era. Also I can't really see a huge physical difference between 6 1 and 6 3. Especially when lineman are there at 6 5 or better in a lot of cases.

QBs seem to be getting a bit taller on average in the last 20 years but it's a factor of an inch, I'd say.

Ponder is average size for his position and there seemed to be as many good QBs of his size than 6 4 or above. Probably more good QBs his size since there are more of them from the get go.

It's an interesting discussion, as I'm always wondering about players from different eras matching up with the current specimens that are playing these days...in every sport. But NFL QB seems a little bit behind that curve because it takes a heck of lot more than size to be succsessful at the position.

It does seem to be catching up with guys like Big Ben, Flacco, the Mannings, Rivers, Brady and Newton.


Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:38 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee

Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Posts: 4016
Location: So. Utah
Post Re: Nice story on Boise St. QB
Mothman wrote:
The Breeze wrote:
If I did my math right....this averages to 6 1 and a half for these 125 QBs


:rofl: You really were bored!

:oops: :rofl:


Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:42 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.