Page 2 of 2

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 5:55 am
by Jordysghost
To quote a HOF CB after his team had just got done winning the SB off of a 10-6 season and last seed playoff run, "Things break, fix it and move on." I have no doubt in my mind the Packers will respond in a manner befitting of a 13 time Championship winning organization.

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:58 am
by DK Sweets
Six posts in a row, Jordy? Are you kidding me?

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:05 am
by Jordysghost
DK Sweets wrote:Six posts in a row, Jordy? Are you kidding me?
5 of them were direct responses to other posts.

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 8:25 am
by Hunter Morrow
A forearm to the head my bollocks. Pure incidental contact. It was a a chicken^*%# call that Rodgers got.

Especially on the road. Does any other QB get that called on the road? At least Vikings fans are honest when we get a soft roughing the passer penalty helping us out. Packers fans are in total denial about the penalty situation with their team.

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 8:29 am
by Jordysghost
Hunter Morrow wrote:A forearm to the head my bollocks. Pure incidental contact. It was a a chicken^*%# call that Rodgers got.

Especially on the road. Does any other QB get that called on the road? At least Vikings fans are honest when we get a soft roughing the passer penalty helping us out. Packers fans are in total denial about the penalty situation with their team.
(facepalm)

Even if you think that a correctly called penalty was incorrect, why don't you bother to look up how many roughing the passer calls the Packers have gotten in the last 5 years, before you #### incessantly about it?

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:04 am
by Purple bruise
Jordysghost wrote:
Actually no, we are still 6-1 and one of the best teams in the league, despite being wrecked with injuries.

As long as we have Rodgers, we will always be 'special', and not in the way you try so hard to believe.
As long as you have Rogers :spanking: That is correct but even old double check showed a chink in his armor and passed for less than 80 yards. The key to beating the packers is lots of hits and putting continual pressure on him.
Quit whining about injuries, the Vikes have as many and probably more to key players than the Puke have had.
Enjoy your "rant" after your 24 hour timeout in the corner. The next one might/hope will be your last.

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 12:18 pm
by Jordysghost
Purple bruise wrote: As long as you have Rogers :spanking: That is correct but even old double check showed a chink in his armor and passed for less than 80 yards. The key to beating the packers is lots of hits and putting continual pressure on him.
Quit whining about injuries, the Vikes have as many and probably more to key players than the Puke have had.
Enjoy your "rant" after your 24 hour timeout in the corner. The next one might/hope will be your last.

Your 'key' for is incorrect, as evidenced by the fact that the Packers had one of the worst offensive line in the league for the first 6 and half years his a starter, like really, comon man, im sure you can remember Allen taking us to woodshed year after year.

Im not whining about injuries at all, I think injuries are a part of the game and something that must be overcome, but no, the Vikings haven't, and I do know that the Vikings have suffered some injury problems of their own, I follow the Vikings more then any other non Packers team in the league, but probably not to depth the Packers have, our top 5 WRs all have been dealing with nagging injuries, 3 missing time for said injuries, one playing through a joint AC sprain. Our top two corners, and second round pick corner all got injured early on against the Broncos, and Clay Matthews was playing through his injury late in the game. (Not smart move by our coaching staff, imo.) The fact that we managed to be top 5 in both Offense and Defense going into Sunday was quite remarkable given the sheer numbers of our injury report.

The Broncos winning last night was a testament to their secondary, as good as their front seven played, the Broncos secondary had a great game, and they took our WRs to the woodshed, we weren't get any seperation all game long. Rodgers is the best in the league against the blitz and as mentioned above, had terrible o lines the entirety of his career, including ttwo plus 50+ sack seasons, how you are getting that all you need to do is pressure him and hit him, then our constant playoff runs from 09-14 doesn't make much sense.

What rant are you talking about? I was directly replying to other posts in every post in this thread but one,

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:42 pm
by S197
It was the correct call as much as it pains me to say it. Hit to the head is an auto penalty. Bridgewater got a similar flag for a much lesser hit.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:13 am
by thegog01
the road. Does any other QB get that called on the road? At least Vikings fans are honest goldenslot

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 10:45 am
by Jordysghost
thegog01 wrote:the road. Does any other QB get that called on the road? At least Vikings fans are honest goldenslot
I have seen Rodgers take shots like that on the road with no call plenty.

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 7:01 pm
by jackal

I have seen Rodgers take shots like that on the road with no call plenty.
Don't ask, Don't tell about the Packers road trips ,,,, :whistle: :whistle:

Re: Without a Roughing the Rodgers call, Packers would have

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 5:59 pm
by Jordysghost
jackal wrote: Don't ask, Don't tell about the Packers road trips ,,,, :whistle: :whistle:
If they're anything like the Vikings party boat socials..