View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:09 pm



Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 2018 Offseason Thread 
Author Message
Hall of Fame Candidate

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Posts: 3387
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Belicik isn't as draft savvy as the popular conception makes him out to be. One of the downsides of constantly being a top 2 team in the AFC is you are constantly a bottom 4 draft pick. The strength of the Patriots has been coaching unknown, low draft equity guys up and getting them to perform at a competitive level, especially on defense. The real beauty of that organization has been the speed with which they have been able to get guys up to that competitive level every year.

I know the Draft is a big deal to everyone, but think about the above for a moment. The Patriots almost never have a top 1st round pick, at least not in the Brady/Belicik era. That is going on 16 years. Yet they are constantly the elite team in the entire playoff picture. Now, I know some of that is having Brady. I get it. But other teams have great QBs and they are no where near as consistent. (Saints and Packers come to mind) There is only one team that has done it that long. IMO, there is a lesson to be learned here. It isn't just about drafting this guy or signing that other big name free agent guy. It is getting the most out of them and getting it as soon as possible.

This is why I think the new OC is such a big deal. Shurmer was able to get a lot out Keenum, Diggs, and Thielen, two of whom were undrafted! Is a new guy going to have the same talent in getting the most out of what he has to work with or is only going ot be successful if he has big shiny toys?

FWIW, I think Zimmer has something to do with the success of low draft equity guys and deserves credit for it. Look at how much Sandejo has improved. Likewise, look at how our 3T DE has managed to stay decent despite the Floyd knee issue. (This position needs more juice, but it isn't a weakness.) Another example is Hunter. Late round guy they have turned into a solid player.

_________________
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi


Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:29 am
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 584
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
halfgiz wrote:
Edit: Dont we now owe Philly a 3rd pick? Or was that void since Sam was injured?


There does not appear to be an injury guarantee.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2661 ... d-reaction
Quote:
The Eagles confirmed the news and officially announced the team netted a 2017 first-round pick and 2018 fourth-round pick in exchange for Bradford. Adam Schefter of ESPN reported the 2018 pick would become a third-round selection if the Vikings reach the NFC Championship Game. He added that if the team wins the Super Bowl, it becomes a second-round pick.


So the Vikings reach the NFC Championship game without Bradford at QB and now they owe the Eagles a 3rd round pick for Bradford. :hitfan:


Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:40 am
Profile
Transition Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 332
Location: Austin, TX
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
720pete wrote:
So the Vikings reach the NFC Championship game without Bradford at QB and now they owe the Eagles a 3rd round pick for Bradford. :hitfan:


I thought that was if we were to reach the NFC Champ game last year. I could be wrong, but that was my impression.


Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:07 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 18247
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Purple Domination wrote:
720pete wrote:
So the Vikings reach the NFC Championship game without Bradford at QB and now they owe the Eagles a 3rd round pick for Bradford. :hitfan:


I thought that was if we were to reach the NFC Champ game last year. I could be wrong, but that was my impression.
That's what I thought too, but how lame that the fame was in Philly.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬


Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:55 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:38 am
Posts: 297
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
720pete wrote:
halfgiz wrote:
Edit: Dont we now owe Philly a 3rd pick? Or was that void since Sam was injured?


There does not appear to be an injury guarantee.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2661 ... d-reaction
Quote:
The Eagles confirmed the news and officially announced the team netted a 2017 first-round pick and 2018 fourth-round pick in exchange for Bradford. Adam Schefter of ESPN reported the 2018 pick would become a third-round selection if the Vikings reach the NFC Championship Game. He added that if the team wins the Super Bowl, it becomes a second-round pick.


So the Vikings reach the NFC Championship game without Bradford at QB and now they owe the Eagles a 3rd round pick for Bradford. :hitfan:


Omg. And the Eagles keep winning.

_________________
Offseason Goal: Draft durable, tough, intelligent offensive lineman who are dependable technicians and avoid penalties aka drive killers.


Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:05 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10984
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
VikingLord wrote:
S197 wrote:
This may change as my head isn't right but this is my thinking right now:

- Get Drew Brees. Offer him $30 million, tell him he can chose his OC, whatever it takes.
- Grab a QB in the 1st round (not Rosen or Sam Darnold). Josh Allen maybe. Someone who can take a year or two to learn under Brees. Sloter as your 3rd.
- 2nd and 3rd round grab a G and TE, depending on how the board shakes out. Backfill with other lineman later in the draft or FA
- Resign Jet
- FA/Draft to address other needs (nickel CB, WR, DT, K, DE)
- Extend Diggs and Kendricks. Hunter is a cap casualty but will still be here for one more year. Barr dependent upon 2018 performance.


Signing Brees reminds me of getting Favre at this point. You're going all-in on a guy and hoping he doesn't fall off a cliff in terms of performance. Favre gave the Vikes one good year. How many more does Brees have in the tank?

Not sure on getting a QB high in the draft. I could see them take one in the 4th-5th, but where they will be choosing in the first 3 rounds I don't see a guy who is likely to be worth it, especially given some of the other needs on the team.

QB is a tough spot for this team. If Bradford's knees check out I'd bring him back on a reasonable deal. I'd let Bridgewater go and see if Keenum is interested in taking backup money. If not, go to the well in FA to get another vet option as a backup and keep bringing Sloter along.


Oh it's definitely an all-in Favre type of move. I think Brees easily has a year or two left. As I mentioned in the Miracle thread, this team's window of opportunity is closing fast and I'm ready to push the chips in. Drafting a QB means you're not totally screwed when Brees is done like we were with Favre.

We're going to have to make some tough decisions after next season with some real key free agents. We have enough pieces in place that an elite QB can take it over the top. Turn up the boost, flood the engine with nitrous, and win the god damn race for once. I don't care if the engine blows up at the top end anymore, just cross the damn finish line first for once!


Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:31 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
One guy I would love to land is Billy Price C/OG from Ohio St. He's a stud lineman that has versatility (which we will lose when Berger retires). Plus Elflein has played with him. So I feel like that would be a great C/OG combo.

Also, some names to watch for 3 tech DTs:

-Da'Ron Payne from Bama. Kid has freakish athleticism and quickness.
-Taven Bryan from Florida. He's actually drawn comparisons to JJ Watt in terms of when he's on, he can literally dominate a game
-Maurice Hurst from Michigan. He's undersized but has a get off like Everson Griffen. He was in the backfield non-stop for Michigan disrupting plays

_________________
Image


Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:01 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Posts: 3387
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
S197 wrote:
Oh it's definitely an all-in Favre type of move. I think Brees easily has a year or two left. As I mentioned in the Miracle thread, this team's window of opportunity is closing fast and I'm ready to push the chips in. Drafting a QB means you're not totally screwed when Brees is done like we were with Favre.

We're going to have to make some tough decisions after next season with some real key free agents. We have enough pieces in place that an elite QB can take it over the top. Turn up the boost, flood the engine with nitrous, and win the god damn race for once. I don't care if the engine blows up at the top end anymore, just cross the damn finish line first for once!


I agree. The window is obviously open. The Defense probably has 1-3 more years of dominance left. They've singed just about everyone so the CAP casualty pain probably won't start to really sting until year 2 or year 3. Plus we've got dynamic offensive weapons and an OL that looks to be on the upswing... just need a guy to make it all go.

On a positive note, because of all of the above things, this team should be one of the most desirable landing spots for veterans with 1-3 seasons left in the tank looking for that one last shot at the ring.

_________________
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi


Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:37 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
mansquatch wrote:
S197 wrote:
Oh it's definitely an all-in Favre type of move. I think Brees easily has a year or two left. As I mentioned in the Miracle thread, this team's window of opportunity is closing fast and I'm ready to push the chips in. Drafting a QB means you're not totally screwed when Brees is done like we were with Favre.

We're going to have to make some tough decisions after next season with some real key free agents. We have enough pieces in place that an elite QB can take it over the top. Turn up the boost, flood the engine with nitrous, and win the god damn race for once. I don't care if the engine blows up at the top end anymore, just cross the damn finish line first for once!


I agree. The window is obviously open. The Defense probably has 1-3 more years of dominance left. They've singed just about everyone so the CAP casualty pain probably won't start to really sting until year 2 or year 3. Plus we've got dynamic offensive weapons and an OL that looks to be on the upswing... just need a guy to make it all go.

On a positive note, because of all of the above things, this team should be one of the most desirable landing spots for veterans with 1-3 seasons left in the tank looking for that one last shot at the ring.


I think this defense can continue dominance as long as Spielman and Zim continue to bring in the right pieces. And I agree this is definitely a desirable landing spot for FA's

_________________
Image


Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:06 am
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 8219
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
As long as Rick doesnt make any more horrible trades like the one for Bradford, we should be able to recover through drafting. We just cant sell the Vikings out again, for a QB like Favre or Bradford. I'm not sure anymore if Case is the answer, but spending a huge amount on Smith, Brees, Manning, whatever, isnt the answer. I dont know what is because this team cant find a QB to play for 5 years or more. Whether its bad luck or scouting, our QBs have been sub par or cursed.


Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:40 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:38 am
Posts: 297
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/p ... ree-agents

Wouldn't mind the Vikings pursuing Norwell.

_________________
Offseason Goal: Draft durable, tough, intelligent offensive lineman who are dependable technicians and avoid penalties aka drive killers.


Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:02 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:35 pm
Posts: 292
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Good write up as usual PHP, I don't think that there is any chance drafting at # 30 spot that Price or Payne will be there,do you think Rick will be willing to trade up if need be?


Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:14 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10984
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
I think there's a fairly good chance a guy like Price would still be around. Especially if last year is an indication where very few linemen went in the 1st. I've seen a few mocks that have the Vikings taking Price:

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/new ... erthought/

https://www.landof10.com/big-ten/nfl-mo ... january-25


Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:12 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
Posts: 3304
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
The Vikings now have two WRs who can get open 1 on 1 and make contested catches. If they can complete a Cowboys/Titans like OL reconstruction (two new interior starters), add a big back to compliment Cook, and a TE with enough athleticism to create a mismatch with linebackers, merely competent QB play should be enough to keep them very competitive. A vet like Brees or Cousins would set the world on fire with that formula. A mobile QB could also be an interesting fit, and open up holes in the run game for the RBs.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:20 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
As long as Rick doesnt make any more horrible trades like the one for Bradford, we should be able to recover through drafting. We just cant sell the Vikings out again, for a QB like Favre or Bradford. I'm not sure anymore if Case is the answer, but spending a huge amount on Smith, Brees, Manning, whatever, isnt the answer. I dont know what is because this team cant find a QB to play for 5 years or more. Whether its bad luck or scouting, our QBs have been sub par or cursed.


Well in 2016 someone needed to be our QB. It was either Hill or Bradford. I take throwing a first away and getting Bradford any day over letting our team rot and hope Hill can win some games. Either way, I dont think the trade effected us much anyways. We were able to land Cook and Elflein with our first two picks anyways. Would a first help? Sure but it's not like we had a bad draft because of that trade

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:25 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Husker Vike wrote:
Good write up as usual PHP, I don't think that there is any chance drafting at # 30 spot that Price or Payne will be there,do you think Rick will be willing to trade up if need be?


For sure. When you have a deeper team like we do, it's easier to trade up to get better players. Spielman always did a lot of trading down in later rounds to provide depth on the roster. He can easily do that again if he wants to trade up in the first.

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:27 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
fiestavike wrote:
The Vikings now have two WRs who can get open 1 on 1 and make contested catches. If they can complete a Cowboys/Titans like OL reconstruction (two new interior starters), add a big back to compliment Cook, and a TE with enough athleticism to create a mismatch with linebackers, merely competent QB play should be enough to keep them very competitive. A vet like Brees or Cousins would set the world on fire with that formula. A mobile QB could also be an interesting fit, and open up holes in the run game for the RBs.


I dont see the need for another RB when we still have Murray under contract. He had a pretty solid year for us and can carry a load when needed. No chance we land Brees or Cousins IMO

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:28 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 8219
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
As long as Rick doesnt make any more horrible trades like the one for Bradford, we should be able to recover through drafting. We just cant sell the Vikings out again, for a QB like Favre or Bradford. I'm not sure anymore if Case is the answer, but spending a huge amount on Smith, Brees, Manning, whatever, isnt the answer. I dont know what is because this team cant find a QB to play for 5 years or more. Whether its bad luck or scouting, our QBs have been sub par or cursed.


Well in 2016 someone needed to be our QB. It was either Hill or Bradford. I take throwing a first away and getting Bradford any day over letting our team rot and hope Hill can win some games. Either way, I dont think the trade effected us much anyways. We were able to land Cook and Elflein with our first two picks anyways. Would a first help? Sure but it's not like we had a bad draft because of that trade


We are also losing a 4th at the very least this year.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:39 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
Posts: 3304
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
fiestavike wrote:
The Vikings now have two WRs who can get open 1 on 1 and make contested catches. If they can complete a Cowboys/Titans like OL reconstruction (two new interior starters), add a big back to compliment Cook, and a TE with enough athleticism to create a mismatch with linebackers, merely competent QB play should be enough to keep them very competitive. A vet like Brees or Cousins would set the world on fire with that formula. A mobile QB could also be an interesting fit, and open up holes in the run game for the RBs.


I dont see the need for another RB when we still have Murray under contract. He had a pretty solid year for us and can carry a load when needed. No chance we land Brees or Cousins IMO


Murray just isn't very good. Plus the vikings need a bigger back who can make a bit of hay after contact.

*edit: by 'bigger' I mean a power back. despite his size, Murray is an upright runner who doesn't break many tackles or have much drive.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:48 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
fiestavike wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
fiestavike wrote:
The Vikings now have two WRs who can get open 1 on 1 and make contested catches. If they can complete a Cowboys/Titans like OL reconstruction (two new interior starters), add a big back to compliment Cook, and a TE with enough athleticism to create a mismatch with linebackers, merely competent QB play should be enough to keep them very competitive. A vet like Brees or Cousins would set the world on fire with that formula. A mobile QB could also be an interesting fit, and open up holes in the run game for the RBs.


I dont see the need for another RB when we still have Murray under contract. He had a pretty solid year for us and can carry a load when needed. No chance we land Brees or Cousins IMO


Murray just isn't very good. Plus the vikings need a bigger back who can make a bit of hay after contact.

*edit: by 'bigger' I mean a power back. despite his size, Murray is an upright runner who doesn't break many tackles or have much drive.


I dont get why people are saying this. "Murray just isnt very good"? He had 842 yards and 8 tds in 12 games practically. If Cook wasnt here and he started those first 4 games he would've been over 1000 yards and probably double digit TDs. Thats considered "not very good" now??

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:19 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
As long as Rick doesnt make any more horrible trades like the one for Bradford, we should be able to recover through drafting. We just cant sell the Vikings out again, for a QB like Favre or Bradford. I'm not sure anymore if Case is the answer, but spending a huge amount on Smith, Brees, Manning, whatever, isnt the answer. I dont know what is because this team cant find a QB to play for 5 years or more. Whether its bad luck or scouting, our QBs have been sub par or cursed.


Well in 2016 someone needed to be our QB. It was either Hill or Bradford. I take throwing a first away and getting Bradford any day over letting our team rot and hope Hill can win some games. Either way, I dont think the trade effected us much anyways. We were able to land Cook and Elflein with our first two picks anyways. Would a first help? Sure but it's not like we had a bad draft because of that trade


We are also losing a 4th at the very least this year.


Ok? In what way is it going to be MORE than a 4th? Its a 4th as far as I know. And still, I'd rather not let our team rot for a year for a first and a 4th.

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:21 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
Posts: 3304
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Pondering Her Percy wrote:

I dont get why people are saying this. "Murray just isnt very good"? He had 842 yards and 8 tds in 12 games practically. If Cook wasnt here and he started those first 4 games he would've been over 1000 yards and probably double digit TDs. Thats considered "not very good" now??


I think there is a fundamental distinction between fans who measure player performance by stats, and fans who measure player performance by performance, and I have come to the conclussion that it is an unbridgable gap.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:43 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
fiestavike wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:

I dont get why people are saying this. "Murray just isnt very good"? He had 842 yards and 8 tds in 12 games practically. If Cook wasnt here and he started those first 4 games he would've been over 1000 yards and probably double digit TDs. Thats considered "not very good" now??


I think there is a fundamental distinction between fans who measure player performance by stats, and fans who measure player performance by performance, and I have come to the conclussion that it is an unbridgable gap.


I'm not measuring just by stats. But either way, if you're going over 1000 and scoring double digit tds I dont care who you are, thats a good year in the NFL. If he "wasnt very good" he wouldnt have done what he did this year and lead one of the better rushing attacks in the NFL. He is probably hands down the top backup in the NFL when Cook comes back (outside of the Ingram/Kamara combo which is a little different). So why would he not be a good enough backup?? He could probably go and start for a handful of teams next year.

_________________
Image


Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:53 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6853
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
I dont see the need for another RB when we still have Murray under contract. He had a pretty solid year for us and can carry a load when needed. No chance we land Brees or Cousins IMO

You and I disagreed on Murray early in the season. I didn't see much in him. But I have to say, he showed me something throughout the year the more he recovered from ankle surgery. I do think he runs a bit upright for a big back, and he isn't much of a home-run threat. But he's a solid between-the-tackles runner who catches the ball out of the backfield and does a good job in protection. He's also a quality teammate and a solid veteran presence, from everything I've read. And his best quality might be how tough he is near the goal line, which makes our red-zone offense better. I'm fine with keeping him.

To me, there really isn't room for all three -- Cook, Murray and McKinnon. I'd keep Cook and Murray. I love Jet, but he's basically a smaller, less talented version of Cook. Murray and Cook have different running styles. They'd be a nice change-of-pace for each other.

As for Brees or Cousins, I'd agree with you on Brees. Let's see about Cousins. He'd be really expensive, but he could be a great fit for this team. He's got plenty of arm talent and lots of mobility. Also, the Vikings have a lot going for them. A head coach who is really gaining a solid reputation in the NFL. An amazing stadium. A brand-new team facility. A roster that is ready to win right now. Incredible as it may sound, the Minnesota Vikings may be one of the most attractive teams out there to free agents. It's a matter of whether the Vikings want to spend the money on him. But I believe if they went after him, he'd listen.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:56 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1704
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
I dont see the need for another RB when we still have Murray under contract. He had a pretty solid year for us and can carry a load when needed. No chance we land Brees or Cousins IMO

You and I disagreed on Murray early in the season. I didn't see much in him. But I have to say, he showed me something throughout the year the more he recovered from ankle surgery. I do think he runs a bit upright for a big back, and he isn't much of a home-run threat. But he's a solid between-the-tackles runner who catches the ball out of the backfield and does a good job in protection. He's also a quality teammate and a solid veteran presence, from everything I've read. And his best quality might be how tough he is near the goal line, which makes our red-zone offense better. I'm fine with keeping him.

To me, there really isn't room for all three -- Cook, Murray and McKinnon. I'd keep Cook and Murray. I love Jet, but he's basically a smaller, less talented version of Cook. Murray and Cook have different running styles. They'd be a nice change-of-pace for each other.

As for Brees or Cousins, I'd agree with you on Brees. Let's see about Cousins. He'd be really expensive, but he could be a great fit for this team. He's got plenty of arm talent and lots of mobility. Also, the Vikings have a lot going for them. A head coach who is really gaining a solid reputation in the NFL. An amazing stadium. A brand-new team facility. A roster that is ready to win right now. Incredible as it may sound, the Minnesota Vikings may be one of the most attractive teams out there to free agents. It's a matter of whether the Vikings want to spend the money on him. But I believe if they went after him, he'd listen.



I heard Latavius Murray could be a cut/restructure candidate. His contract was designed in a way to give the Vikings a choice to continue the relationship after 2018.
So it remains to be seen what the Vikings will do, or if we cut Murray would he re-sign?
Maybe with McKinnon leaving that would change things.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:06 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6853
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
halfgiz wrote:
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
I dont see the need for another RB when we still have Murray under contract. He had a pretty solid year for us and can carry a load when needed. No chance we land Brees or Cousins IMO

You and I disagreed on Murray early in the season. I didn't see much in him. But I have to say, he showed me something throughout the year the more he recovered from ankle surgery. I do think he runs a bit upright for a big back, and he isn't much of a home-run threat. But he's a solid between-the-tackles runner who catches the ball out of the backfield and does a good job in protection. He's also a quality teammate and a solid veteran presence, from everything I've read. And his best quality might be how tough he is near the goal line, which makes our red-zone offense better. I'm fine with keeping him.

To me, there really isn't room for all three -- Cook, Murray and McKinnon. I'd keep Cook and Murray. I love Jet, but he's basically a smaller, less talented version of Cook. Murray and Cook have different running styles. They'd be a nice change-of-pace for each other.

As for Brees or Cousins, I'd agree with you on Brees. Let's see about Cousins. He'd be really expensive, but he could be a great fit for this team. He's got plenty of arm talent and lots of mobility. Also, the Vikings have a lot going for them. A head coach who is really gaining a solid reputation in the NFL. An amazing stadium. A brand-new team facility. A roster that is ready to win right now. Incredible as it may sound, the Minnesota Vikings may be one of the most attractive teams out there to free agents. It's a matter of whether the Vikings want to spend the money on him. But I believe if they went after him, he'd listen.



I heard Latavius Murray could be a cut/restructure candidate. His contract was designed in a way to give the Vikings a choice to continue the relationship after 2018.
So it remains to be seen what the Vikings will do, or if we cut Murray would he re-sign?
Maybe with McKinnon leaving that would change things.

Only place I've heard about Murray as a cut candidate is on fan sites like this one. Not on any legitimate news outlet.

If I were Murray and the Vikings cut me, there's no way I'd re-sign. The guy ran for more than 800 yards in 12 games and scored 8 times. If I did that for a team and they asked me to take a pay cut, I'd walk. He's a solid player. He'd find a home.

I'd be very surprised (and disappointed) if Latavius Murray is not on the Vikings next year. McKinnon, on the other hand, wants to be a feature back. I'll be shocked if he's in purple next season.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:50 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 18247
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Are Murray and Cook complimentary? They seem very similar to me.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬


Tue Jan 30, 2018 8:15 am
Profile YIM WWW
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4905
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
PurpleMustReign wrote:
Are Murray and Cook complimentary? They seem very similar to me.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk


Different style runners for sure

_________________
Image


Tue Jan 30, 2018 10:10 am
Profile
Transition Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:40 am
Posts: 384
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
Cook and Murray are both versatile and agile, but that's kind of where the similarities end. Cook is better on the outside in space while Murray is a between-the-tackles back good for getting some tough yards, but they each can do both fairly well from what I've seen, and both got good hands for catching screen passes. Makes it nice for not telegraphing your plays when you have versatile backs like that.

As far as the offseason goes, I think we have a lot of the right pieces. I'm not sure what to make of the QB situation, there's a lot that Spielman is probably thinking about right now that could go into that discussion and I can't really even imagine what that's like. I'm currently leaning towards wanting them to bring back Keenum, although Teddy's an interesting option because he has been good for us in the past, the team's mostly in-tune with him and vice-versa, and he will most likely be cheap. He had a pretty gruesome knee injury though, and I'm not so sure that he's going to necessarily be the same if he were to resume his position as starting QB. I think Bradford is more than likely the one who's gone even if he is the most proven QB at the pro level - he's a big injury risk with that oft-injured knee, he was ineffective when he returned against the Bears, and he's going to be asking for big money most likely. Some have mentioned Brees or Cousins, I think both of those guys would cost way too much money to bring here and would inhibit our ability to sign players to fill other needs at positions like offensive guard and defensive tackle, as well as our ability to maybe extend someone like Anthony Barr who I would definitely want to see here for another 5 years or so.

What do you guys think? It's going to be an interesting offseason no matter what, but will it be an ultimately GOOD offseason?


Tue Jan 30, 2018 5:09 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Posts: 1395
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post Re: 2018 Offseason Thread
As far as the qb's go I'm hoping that they all get to test the market and get a idea what these guys are worth. Questions arise how much interest any of them will garner.
Murray is good enough. Leroy Hoard 2.0. Need a guy like that. Especially that we don't really know what we'll have in Cook when he comes back. Hoping for the best for sure.
As far as the draft goes, I don't think Price would be available for us but if so, wow! Him and Elf together would be interesting to see who would end up at C. Need more push up front on both sides. That is what I try to finagle.
I'm just hoping we buck a trend and NOT draft a WR in the 1st round.

_________________
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter


Tue Jan 30, 2018 5:40 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.