Page 2 of 6

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:53 am
by mansquatch
It would be a MAJOR coaching blunder to switch starting QBs in the playoffs after Keenum has been at the helm since week 2.

I really want to believe that Zimmer and his staff are too smart to do something that colossally stupid with all the marbles on the table and the best defense in the playoffs.

That article was daily norseman, so curious if they are just pontificating or if they have a source. My guess is they are just being stupid.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:11 am
by Dames
mansquatch wrote:It would be a MAJOR coaching blunder to switch starting QBs in the playoffs after Keenum has been at the helm since week 2.

I really want to believe that Zimmer and his staff are too smart to do something that colossally stupid with all the marbles on the table and the best defense in the playoffs.

That article was daily norseman, so curious if they are just pontificating or if they have a source. My guess is they are just being stupid.
The article doesn't suggest that they would make Bradford the starter, just put him back on the active roster (presumably to be the backup). I think it it would be smart. He looked razor sharp week 1. Case is clearly the starter going forward.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:16 am
by mansquatch
I don't care if they put him on the roster, but can you imagine what would happen if they started him and they lost the playoff game? That would go down as one of the most egregious coaching blunders of all time.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:36 am
by TSonn
mansquatch wrote:I don't care if they put him on the roster, but can you imagine what would happen if they started him and they lost the playoff game? That would go down as one of the most egregious coaching blunders of all time.
If we lost 41-0? Sure.
If we lost 41-35 in a shootout? Probably not.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 11:58 am
by Mothman
TSonn wrote: If we lost 41-0? Sure.
If we lost 41-35 in a shootout? Probably not.
Where did you come up with a hypothetical score of 41-0? I'm not aware of ANY conference championship game ever ending with that score. Not one. Nope. Never happened.

Never. Happened.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:22 pm
by PurpleMustReign
Mothman wrote: Where did you come up with a hypothetical score of 41-0? I'm not aware of ANY conference championship game ever ending with that score. Not one. Nope. Never happened.

Never. Happened.
Remember they canceled the Super Bowl that one season for no apparent reason? Maybe that is when something arbitrary like that happened

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:51 pm
by TeamChaplain
I agree that Sam is done in Minnesota.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:57 pm
by Cliff
I think Sam should maybe considering just being done period. He's a competitor so I expect him to keep pushing ahead but man ... the poor guy has taken a beating. Not only with one of the worst offensive lines of all time last season but he had some real stinkers in his first several seasons.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:11 pm
by Pondering Her Percy
Cliff wrote:I think Sam should maybe considering just being done period. He's a competitor so I expect him to keep pushing ahead but man ... the poor guy has taken a beating. Not only with one of the worst offensive lines of all time last season but he had some real stinkers in his first several seasons.
Yeah he's had poor OLs his whole career. I feel bad for the guy because I do believe he is a good QB.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:29 pm
by soflavike
If you need a quick refresher, here are Bradford's highlights from Week 1 vs New Orleans.

https://youtu.be/wDRPG8JdHqQ

The guy can play when he's healthy.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:49 pm
by Pondering Her Percy
soflavike wrote:If you need a quick refresher, here are Bradford's highlights from Week 1 vs New Orleans.

https://youtu.be/wDRPG8JdHqQ

The guy can play when he's healthy.
Exactly. That is why he should definitely be the #2 IF he's healthy. He's a good QB with awful luck IMO

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:54 pm
by VikingLord
Even if Bradford is activated I don't see how he gets back on the field. Bridgewater should be the backup at this point in the season.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:35 pm
by Pondering Her Percy
VikingLord wrote:Even if Bradford is activated I don't see how he gets back on the field. Bridgewater should be the backup at this point in the season.
If he's activated and (knock on wood) we need a QB change, why wouldnt he get on the field. Teddy hasnt played in over a year and a half. Do you really want him running this offense in the playoffs?? This is why I said earlier in the year that if Teddy didnt play when he was activated, we should've held him out the rest of the year. Which we've done so far but we are now at the point where the playoffs are about to be here and he has no IN GAME experience other than 2 check downs. Hopefully he can get some burn in the next two games but right now, IF Sam is healthy, he needs to be the #2. I feel 100% comfortable with Sam running the show if it ever came down to that in the playoffs. I dont feel that with Teddy

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:39 pm
by TSonn
I think there's a case (no pun intended) to be made for any of our QBs moving forward.

Bradford = easily the best arm talent on the team. Also might be the best at pre-snap reads (thanks 2016 o-line). Legs could literally fall apart at any moment on or off the field.
Keenum = toughest competitor and best intangibles. Lacking in measurables but who cares about those. 29 years old so still could have a solid 5+ years left. Plus, he has two knees.
Bridgewater = great leader but has never really proved himself on the NFL field. Youngest option and could still have 10+ years left. Could still become great? Could also have another fluke injury?

I'm sure the front office has a plan and I'll understand their reasoning for whichever guy they keep. I'll be super stoked if we're able to keep 2 of them.

Re: Bradford Could Return (?)

Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:42 pm
by Boon
Mothman wrote: Where did you come up with a hypothetical score of 41-0? I'm not aware of ANY conference championship game ever ending with that score. Not one. Nope. Never happened.

Never. Happened.


:lol: