View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:19 pm



Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion 
Author Message
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
The reason I think the Rams are more of a threat than the Eagles, Todd Gurley. Vikings need to contain him (rushing and receiving) to stay in this game.

Looks like Griffen will be 100% for this game (heard it was his decision to sit out of the Redskins game). Gonna need him to disrupt the Rams screen game.

Big test for the defense. Big test for the OL. Should be a fun game to watch.



Good article to get the discussion going.

Forget the QBs, Rams-Vikings is a battle of the defenses

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Last edited by 808vikingsfan on Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:15 pm
Profile
Online
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 24100
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Sendejo missing practice with a groin.

Remmers, Sirles, Griffen are back.

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:19 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 18107
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Sendejo will miss two weeks.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2016‬


Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:11 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
http://506sports.com/nfl.php?yr=2017&wk=11

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:37 pm
Profile
Online
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 24100
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Hmmm. . Anthony Harris limited with a hamstring. He's been Sendejo's understudy. Not good. Kearse would be a steeper downgrade.

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:01 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Posts: 5654
Location: The Great White North
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Rams are definitely a tall order this year. Solid all-around team that scores a lot, doesn't give up many points, and can run and pass effectively on offense. The main chink in their armor, if they have a weakness, might be their run defense. Vikes have been effective running the ball this year, so that might be a way to keep the pace down a bit if the Rams come out hot.

If the Vikes want that beautiful new stadium to host as many postseason games as possible this year, this is a game they have to win.


Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:18 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
dead_poet wrote:
Hmmm. . Anthony Harris limited with a hamstring. He's been Sendejo's understudy. Not good. Kearse would be a steeper downgrade.


Concerning, especially with the vertical threat of the Rams. Who else we got ? Maybe Newman again?

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:56 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Another analysis of the game.

McVay’s Offense, Zimmer’s Defense, and Everything You Need to Know About the Rams-Vikings Showdown


Quote:
Jared Goff has progressed tremendously in Year Two, but he remains a work in progress when throwing with defenders in his face. Goff still must fight his natural tendency to back up against interior pressure. Zimmer does not employ his trademark double-A-gap blitzes as much as he used to, but it would make sense to bring them in this game. Not only can that get Goff playing hastily, it also ensures one-on-one blocking against Minnesota’s edge rushers. On the left side, Rams tackle Andrew Whitworth has been outstanding when he wins on initial contact, but when he’s in reactionary mode, his 35 years of age show. Griffen’s low-to-the-ground bull rush could pose problems for the 6' 7" veteran.

The risk of going double-A-gap is you’re weak on the edges. That’s a problem against Todd Gurley, who has killed defenses by turning the corner in the zone running game and catching balls in the flat. There’s also Tavon Austin, whose jet sweep action is a big part of Los Angeles’s attack.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:36 pm
Profile
Online
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 24100
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
808vikingsfan wrote:
dead_poet wrote:
Hmmm. . Anthony Harris limited with a hamstring. He's been Sendejo's understudy. Not good. Kearse would be a steeper downgrade.


Concerning, especially with the vertical threat of the Rams. Who else we got ? Maybe Newman again?


He'd get my vote over Kearse.

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:15 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1652
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Who was Brock and Newman replacing in the Skins game?

If it wouldn't be for Sendejo being injured we would be in pretty good shape.


Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:47 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm
Posts: 6078
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
halfgiz wrote:


If it wouldn't be for Sendejo being injured we would be in pretty good shape.

I agree with you, although I have to file the above statement under the header of “Things I never thought I’d say.”

:tongue:

_________________
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!


Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:38 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Posts: 2910
Location: Missouri
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Just Me wrote:
halfgiz wrote:


If it wouldn't be for Sendejo being injured we would be in pretty good shape.

I agree with you, although I have to file the above statement under the header of “Things I never thought I’d say.”

:tongue:
You're right, and even more jarring is the fact that it didn't register as odd to me until you pointed it out.


Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:27 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Posts: 3349
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
The Squatch Take: TLDR Rams are a classic case of a 4th place team feasting on a soft schedule

Details:

The Rams have played 2 strong defensive teams this year. They are 1-1 in those games. Goff's numbers:

The game they won:
Vs. Jax 11-21 124yd, 1 TD, 0 INT 86.2 Rating (They won this game on two Special Teams TDs)
vs. SEA 22-47 288yd, 0 TD 2 INT, 48.9 Rating (They lost this game)

The only other OK-ish defensive team they have played is WSH
vs. WSH 14-24 219yd, 1 TD 1 INT, 85.2 Rating (They lost this game also)

Now you might say I'm cherry picking the bad games, and you are right I am, but this is because the Ram's schedule has been pathetic. They've played the following teams: IND, WAS, SF, DAL, SEA, JAX, ARI, NYG, HOU. Of those teams, the best 4 are WAS, DAL, SEA, and JAX. Every other team is a dumpster fire. (They played HOU last week, well after they were competitive.) Of the four non "mess" teams, they went 2-2. They beat JAX on Return TDs (AKA Luck) and DAL was a clean win, but DAL has a porous pass defense, something not true of the other three teams.

What about Todd Gurley? Same three games:

WSH: 16 ATT 88 Yards 1 TD. (OK performance)
SEA: 14 ATT 43 Yards 0 TD (Worst game of the season)
JAX 23 ATT 116 Yards 0 TD

The JAX game is interesting, Gurley had his 2nd highest yardage of season, a solid performance, but the rams were unable to get him in the endzone and thus he was unable to bail out his struggling QB. They won that game on Return TDs which statistically are not normal. (As we saw with the 2016 Vikings.) My sense is if they play that game 5 times, the Rams probably lose it at least 3 of those times.

Gurley is a more consistent offensive threat in terms of yardage, however 4 of his 7 TDs were split between SF and NYG, two of the three worst teams in the NFL. IMO, there seems to be a red zone issue for the RAMs against better defensive opposition. He only managed one TD against the worst defense of the three. This would point towards the Vikings being able to keep them out of the endzone, limiting points.

IMO, the Vikings Defense will need to pay attention to Gurley, but they have experience having played him in 2015. I'm not sold on Goff, his stats against elite defenses are pedestrian. They are what you'd expect from an average to below average NFL starter. There is no reason to expect that the Vikings will not be able to put him on a similarly poor game, especially considering we are playing at home.

This game will come down to limiting Turnovers and the defense returning to 2017 form.

I pick the Vikings to win this one. If the offense plays like it did last week (sans two plays) this game could run away from the Rams. 27-17 Vikings.

_________________
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi


Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:43 pm
Profile
Franchise Player
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:03 am
Posts: 458
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
I like your take Mansquatch

_________________
Formerly AADPFan


Thu Nov 16, 2017 3:25 pm
Profile
Practice Squad

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:35 am
Posts: 11
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Hey all. I was creeping on this board to see what you guys are talking about and remembered I may have joined here a few years ago...awesome.

Great match up Sunday, and who would have thought? Well....maybe you guys, but definitely not me.

Rams fans (or at least this one) are still in shock. Going from where we've been to this year, weak schedule or not, is like going from having no car to driving a Ferrari. Shock.

I don't really know how to view this game: on the one hand, the Vikings defense is scary. As a poster pointed out above, Goff hasn't done so well against defenses like the Vikings. For that reason, win or lose, I'll be watching Goff and the passing game very closely hoping to see progress.

On the other hand...Case Keenum. He's played very, very well this year - he had a game or two like that with the Rams, but we know his shortcomings all too well. The Rams offense has taken the spotlight away from the defense, but the D has been amazing over the past 5 games. We're right there with the Vikings in some categories.

As someone else pointed out above, you'll want to run the ball on us. Even though Thielen and Diggs are amazing, our pass defense is not really what you want to test. We'll give up some chunk yards when a team has established the run, but you definitely want to run the ball - straight at us. We're incredibly undersized up the middle, with no true nose tackle and undersized LBs manning the middle.

Special teams have gotten some love because we're winning - having arguably the best kicker to go along with the best punter in the NFL, a good return man and good coverage units seems like an embarrassment of riches to add onto a team with a top offense and defense. If the offense struggles, it's going to be really tough to get a win. Defense will have to come to play and limit the Vikings offense.

I've gone back and forth about this game. I've said 32-23 Rams (6 FGs, 2 TDs for the Rams, half of which would come from field position created by defense and special teams), to thinking it could be 24-17 Vikings. Two teams that are pretty evenly matched, it seems like this game will come down to turn overs. The Rams are 5-0 in games played outside of LA, so the team will have a ton of confidence - but the Vikings stadium will probably be the loudest we've played in this year.

Here's to a great game.


Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:00 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6726
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
FrantikRam wrote:
On the other hand...Case Keenum. He's played very, very well this year - he had a game or two like that with the Rams, but we know his shortcomings all too well. The Rams offense has taken the spotlight away from the defense, but the D has been amazing over the past 5 games. We're right there with the Vikings in some categories.

With all due respect, how can you give props to Jared Goff for his improvement post-Fisher, but not give credit to Case Keenum for the same thing?

If anybody should know how devastating a quarterback killer Jeff Fisher is, it's Ram fans. Sam Bradford never had a chance. Fisher ruined Nick Foles, who threw 27 TDs and 2 ints for the Eagles before The Killer got his mitts on him. Jared Goff looked completely overmatched last year, and Keenum had no hope of flourishing under Fisher's conservative system. Your team's turnaround is due almost completely to Sean McVay. Obviously nobody knew that a 32-year-old could turn a team around like this, but he's been a breath of fresh air for Goff. There is no doubt in my mind that Case Keenum would be a far better quarterback under McVay than he was under Fisher.

Also, it's important to note that Case Keenum has undergone a similar renaissance here with the Vikings as Goff has with the Rams. We have a good system and good weapons, and our offensive line is very much improved. As he's grown in confidence, Keenum has improved, as well -- I'm pretty confident he's playing consistently better than he ever did for the Rams. With that in mind, I think it's disingenuous to simply say, "We know what Keenum is." I would contend you know what "Keenum under Fisher" was. Prepare to be surprised.

Finally, this will be a good game. But if you think the Rams are beating this Vikings team by 9 in its own stadium ... well, good luck with that.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:16 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6726
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Oh my gosh. I just read Mike Florio's prediction for the game -- he picks the Vikings by 4.

This is the same guy who said last week that the Vikings were worse than 6-2, the Redskins were better than 4-4, and it was "correction Sunday." Didn't bother to mention his extreme lack of judgment this week as he predicts us to beat the 7-2 Rams.

Obviously, I believe the Vikings are going to win. But what a tool Florio is.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:28 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 8:55 pm
Posts: 2448
Location: Olympia, Washington
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
FrantikRam wrote:
Hey all. I was creeping on this board to see what you guys are talking about and remembered I may have joined here a few years ago...awesome.

Great match up Sunday, and who would have thought? Well....maybe you guys, but definitely not me.

Rams fans (or at least this one) are still in shock. Going from where we've been to this year, weak schedule or not, is like going from having no car to driving a Ferrari. Shock.

I don't really know how to view this game: on the one hand, the Vikings defense is scary. As a poster pointed out above, Goff hasn't done so well against defenses like the Vikings. For that reason, win or lose, I'll be watching Goff and the passing game very closely hoping to see progress.

On the other hand...Case Keenum. He's played very, very well this year - he had a game or two like that with the Rams, but we know his shortcomings all too well. The Rams offense has taken the spotlight away from the defense, but the D has been amazing over the past 5 games. We're right there with the Vikings in some categories.

As someone else pointed out above, you'll want to run the ball on us. Even though Thielen and Diggs are amazing, our pass defense is not really what you want to test. We'll give up some chunk yards when a team has established the run, but you definitely want to run the ball - straight at us. We're incredibly undersized up the middle, with no true nose tackle and undersized LBs manning the middle.

Special teams have gotten some love because we're winning - having arguably the best kicker to go along with the best punter in the NFL, a good return man and good coverage units seems like an embarrassment of riches to add onto a team with a top offense and defense. If the offense struggles, it's going to be really tough to get a win. Defense will have to come to play and limit the Vikings offense.

I've gone back and forth about this game. I've said 32-23 Rams (6 FGs, 2 TDs for the Rams, half of which would come from field position created by defense and special teams), to thinking it could be 24-17 Vikings. Two teams that are pretty evenly matched, it seems like this game will come down to turn overs. The Rams are 5-0 in games played outside of LA, so the team will have a ton of confidence - but the Vikings stadium will probably be the loudest we've played in this year.

Here's to a great game.

Welcome back! You guys have had a good year this year. We're hoping this isn't a replay of 1999, where the Rams came out of nowhere to surpass our Vikings and win your first Superbowl. As Mansquatch said above, the Rams look like a good team who has had an easy schedule, but I would not be shocked to see them beat the Vikes in this game. The Vikes seem to be about 60-40 to win this one, which still leaves a lot of scenarios where it's the Rams who move to 8-2.

I'm getting the feeling that this game is going to be a blowout, one way or the other. One of the teams will get a lead, and the other team will press and make mistakes, and it will get out of hand, one way or another. Both QB's run a bit hot and cold, it seems to me. Of course, I'm never right about these things.


Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:31 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
I don't know how much I buy that the Rams have played an easy schedule so far, especially this year. There are no guarantee wins this year. They are blowing out their competition. They blanked AZ. How often do you see a team shutout another?

IMO, the Rams are probably the best team in the NFL. The only team that may be better are the Saints because of Brees. The only weakness I see is Goff. His inexperience may be the Rams downfall. I think to beat the Rams, you have to rattle Goff. To get to Goff, you need to contain Gurley.

I think the Vikings match up well with the Rams but they need a healthy Griffen and Keenum needs to play a mistake free game.

I wish the Vikings had Cook. A homerun threat would take a lot of pressure off the passing game.

I'm glad they're playing this game at home.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:53 am
Profile
Practice Squad

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:35 am
Posts: 11
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
FrantikRam wrote:
On the other hand...Case Keenum. He's played very, very well this year - he had a game or two like that with the Rams, but we know his shortcomings all too well. The Rams offense has taken the spotlight away from the defense, but the D has been amazing over the past 5 games. We're right there with the Vikings in some categories.

With all due respect, how can you give props to Jared Goff for his improvement post-Fisher, but not give credit to Case Keenum for the same thing?

If anybody should know how devastating a quarterback killer Jeff Fisher is, it's Ram fans. Sam Bradford never had a chance. Fisher ruined Nick Foles, who threw 27 TDs and 2 ints for the Eagles before The Killer got his mitts on him. Jared Goff looked completely overmatched last year, and Keenum had no hope of flourishing under Fisher's conservative system. Your team's turnaround is due almost completely to Sean McVay. Obviously nobody knew that a 32-year-old could turn a team around like this, but he's been a breath of fresh air for Goff. There is no doubt in my mind that Case Keenum would be a far better quarterback under McVay than he was under Fisher.

Also, it's important to note that Case Keenum has undergone a similar renaissance here with the Vikings as Goff has with the Rams. We have a good system and good weapons, and our offensive line is very much improved. As he's grown in confidence, Keenum has improved, as well -- I'm pretty confident he's playing consistently better than he ever did for the Rams. With that in mind, I think it's disingenuous to simply say, "We know what Keenum is." I would contend you know what "Keenum under Fisher" was. Prepare to be surprised.

Finally, this will be a good game. But if you think the Rams are beating this Vikings team by 9 in its own stadium ... well, good luck with that.



I actually talked about Goff in my previous post - so I am by no means saying that he's "arrived". Goff is the biggest concern for this game, just as Keenum should be the Vikings biggest concern.

Having said that, Case is short and has questionable arm strength - I'm sure he has improved with the Vikings (from what I've seen he definitely has) - but he was undrafted for a reason, and he was not a good QB under prior coaching either. He has limitations and the most of the players on the Rams went to work with him day in and day out last year.

I agree that it will be a good game.


Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:46 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 3142
Location: Sebastian, FL
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
808vikingsfan wrote:
I don't know how much I buy that the Rams have played an easy schedule so far, especially this year. There are no guarantee wins this year. They are blowing out their competition. They blanked AZ. How often do you see a team shutout another?

IMO, the Rams are probably the best team in the NFL. The only team that may be better are the Saints because of Brees. The only weakness I see is Goff. His inexperience may be the Rams downfall. I think to beat the Rams, you have to rattle Goff. To get to Goff, you need to contain Gurley.

I think the Vikings match up well with the Rams but they need a healthy Griffen and Keenum needs to play a mistake free game.

I wish the Vikings had Cook. A homerun threat would take a lot of pressure off the passing game.

I'm glad they're playing this game at home.

The following is a list of the bottom 10 teams on defense for scoring. In other words, the teams that give up the most points per game. The Viking have played 2 of these teams, the Rams, 6. But yeah, their good.
Code:
23   Arizona Cardinals   24.8
24   Miami Dolphins   24.9
25   Tennessee Titans   25.3
26   Washington Redskins   25.8
27   San Francisco 49ers   26
28   New York Giants   26.4
29   Denver Broncos   26.6
30   Cleveland Browns   26.7
31   Houston Texans   26.8
32   Indianapolis Colts   28

_________________
4th Quarter, 0:10 remaining, leading by 1, ball at home team 39, 3rd down & 10 to go,
Win Probability for the Saints: 99.76%.


Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:19 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Bucky Brooks breaks down the Week 11 matchup between Los Angeles Rams quarterback Jared Goff, and the Minnesota Vikings defense.

Tidbit from this video: 18 of the Vikings 25 sacks were recorded with rushing 4 or fewer.

Jared Goff vs. the Vikings Defense: Who has the Edge? | Scouting Report | NFL Network

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:57 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
Posts: 6726
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
FrantikRam wrote:
J. Kapp 11 wrote:
FrantikRam wrote:
On the other hand...Case Keenum. He's played very, very well this year - he had a game or two like that with the Rams, but we know his shortcomings all too well. The Rams offense has taken the spotlight away from the defense, but the D has been amazing over the past 5 games. We're right there with the Vikings in some categories.

With all due respect, how can you give props to Jared Goff for his improvement post-Fisher, but not give credit to Case Keenum for the same thing?

If anybody should know how devastating a quarterback killer Jeff Fisher is, it's Ram fans. Sam Bradford never had a chance. Fisher ruined Nick Foles, who threw 27 TDs and 2 ints for the Eagles before The Killer got his mitts on him. Jared Goff looked completely overmatched last year, and Keenum had no hope of flourishing under Fisher's conservative system. Your team's turnaround is due almost completely to Sean McVay. Obviously nobody knew that a 32-year-old could turn a team around like this, but he's been a breath of fresh air for Goff. There is no doubt in my mind that Case Keenum would be a far better quarterback under McVay than he was under Fisher.

Also, it's important to note that Case Keenum has undergone a similar renaissance here with the Vikings as Goff has with the Rams. We have a good system and good weapons, and our offensive line is very much improved. As he's grown in confidence, Keenum has improved, as well -- I'm pretty confident he's playing consistently better than he ever did for the Rams. With that in mind, I think it's disingenuous to simply say, "We know what Keenum is." I would contend you know what "Keenum under Fisher" was. Prepare to be surprised.

Finally, this will be a good game. But if you think the Rams are beating this Vikings team by 9 in its own stadium ... well, good luck with that.



I actually talked about Goff in my previous post - so I am by no means saying that he's "arrived". Goff is the biggest concern for this game, just as Keenum should be the Vikings biggest concern.

Having said that, Case is short and has questionable arm strength - I'm sure he has improved with the Vikings (from what I've seen he definitely has) - but he was undrafted for a reason, and he was not a good QB under prior coaching either. He has limitations and the most of the players on the Rams went to work with him day in and day out last year.

I agree that it will be a good game.

Sorry, I probably came off as defensive. I guess my cage gets rattled when people say, "We know who he is." What if key decision makers had made that assessment of Jared Goff after last year's dumpster fire?

Yes, Keenum is undersized, and he doesn't have a cannon. At the same time, Drew Brees has managed to make it work despite the same limitations. Russell Wilson is even shorter than Brees (although he's got a gun). When you're short, you have to make up for it other ways. Keenum does (at least this year). He's smart, he's a tremendous leader, he's mobile in and out of the pocket, and he's improving weekly. Also, I'd say he's getting far better coaching than he's ever had at any level. Is his ceiling as high as Goff or Wentz? Heck no. Does he occasionally make you scratch your head? Sure. Has his ball placement been a concern? Yes, but even THAT is improving. The bottom line is that Case Keenum is, right now, a Top-15 quarterback in the league for this year. There's a reason for THAT -- it's his play. As I've pointed out in other threads, his advanced passing metrics are ALL over 100 (league average) except for TD%+, which is just a tick below at 99.

For the most part, a quarterback's performance has little to do with his draft position. Tom Brady famously was a 6th-round draft choice. Brees was 2nd round. Russell Wilson 3rd round. Dak Prescott 4th round. Josh McCown 3rd round. Kirk Cousins 4th round. in fact, 8 of the top 15 in QBR this year are not first-round picks. And I can name plenty of first-round flameouts. Even Alex Smith was No. 1 overall, but he's done next to nothing until this year (heck, he's never thrown for more than 3,502 yards -- Bradford threw for 3,800 last year). It's rare, but players can emerge out of the darkest of draft shadows, and players can emerge late. I'm not saying Case Keenum is going to be the next Tom Brady. But "we know who he is" isn't nearly as accurate as "we know who he WAS."

I also realize the chances of Case Keenum being the Vikings quarterback in 2018 are slim. Teddy Bridgewater is likely to win back the job at some point. Based on his solid play this season, Case will want a chance to start somewhere. So he's probably gone. But for now, I like the way he's playing.

_________________
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.


Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:51 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10878
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
I'm also glad this game is at home, it may be the difference maker. I haven't watched much of the Rams this year so I don't have much input other than I had a dream last night that the Vikings won 54-34.

This isn't a make or break game for either team but it could certainly put one in the driver's seat.


Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:24 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:03 pm
Posts: 290
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
S197 wrote:
I'm also glad this game is at home, it may be the difference maker. I haven't watched much of the Rams this year so I don't have much input other than I had a dream last night that the Vikings won 54-34.

This isn't a make or break game for either team but it could certainly put one in the driver's seat.


True but if you look up some clips of some Rams home games, you'll see that their stadium arent even half filled


Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:38 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 3142
Location: Sebastian, FL
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Dmizzle0 wrote:
S197 wrote:
I'm also glad this game is at home, it may be the difference maker. I haven't watched much of the Rams this year so I don't have much input other than I had a dream last night that the Vikings won 54-34.

This isn't a make or break game for either team but it could certainly put one in the driver's seat.


True but if you look up some clips of some Rams home games, you'll see that their stadium arent even half filled
Well, it does seat 93,600. So, it may be more full than you think.

_________________
4th Quarter, 0:10 remaining, leading by 1, ball at home team 39, 3rd down & 10 to go,
Win Probability for the Saints: 99.76%.


Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:14 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10878
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Dmizzle0 wrote:
S197 wrote:
I'm also glad this game is at home, it may be the difference maker. I haven't watched much of the Rams this year so I don't have much input other than I had a dream last night that the Vikings won 54-34.

This isn't a make or break game for either team but it could certainly put one in the driver's seat.


True but if you look up some clips of some Rams home games, you'll see that their stadium arent even half filled


Even with their record? That's surprising.


Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:36 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
Raptorman wrote:
Dmizzle0 wrote:
S197 wrote:
I'm also glad this game is at home, it may be the difference maker. I haven't watched much of the Rams this year so I don't have much input other than I had a dream last night that the Vikings won 54-34.

This isn't a make or break game for either team but it could certainly put one in the driver's seat.


True but if you look up some clips of some Rams home games, you'll see that their stadium arent even half filled
Well, it does seat 93,600. So, it may be more full than you think.


looks like the Rams are ranked #9 in attendance through week 10 averaging almost 74K /week. Vikings at #19 averaging 69K/week

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:25 pm
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 18107
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
808vikingsfan wrote:
Raptorman wrote:
Dmizzle0 wrote:
[quote="S197"]I'm also glad this game is at home, it may be the difference maker. I haven't watched much of the Rams this year so I don't have much input other than I had a dream last night that the Vikings won 54-34.

This isn't a make or break game for either team but it could certainly put one in the driver's seat.


True but if you look up some clips of some Rams home games, you'll see that their stadium arent even half filled
Well, it does seat 93,600. So, it may be more full than you think.


looks like the Rams are ranked #9 in attendance through week 10 averaging almost 74K /week. Vikings at #19 averaging 69K/week[/quote]Is that at home only or for every game?

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2016‬


Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:29 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 3121
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: WEEK 11: LA Rams VS Minnesota Vikings Discussion
PurpleMustReign wrote:
808vikingsfan wrote:
Raptorman wrote:
True but if you look up some clips of some Rams home games, you'll see that their stadium arent even half filled
Well, it does seat 93,600. So, it may be more full than you think.


looks like the Rams are ranked #9 in attendance through week 10 averaging almost 74K /week. Vikings at #19 averaging 69K/week
Is that at home only or for every game?

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk[/quote]

Home games.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/attendance/_/sort/allAvg

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:34 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Denardus and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.