Re: Week 2 reaction thread
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 5:49 am
https://www.google.com/search?biw=414&b ... 4q7Um8kBNI
I'm going to buy this and send it to Mckinnons locker
I'm going to buy this and send it to Mckinnons locker
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://vikingsmessageboard.com/
Starting all of your drives at the 10 yard line and maybe having one decent return does not justify him running everything out. They are given a free 25 yards, there is no reason for him to bring something out from 8+ deep.beerfan wrote:Who cares if Mckinnon runs the ball out and we end up starting 7 or 8 yds further back? Its worth the opportunity for a big play even if we havent had any from it yet. Ive heard too many people complaining about it just because the announcers kept bringing it up.
Sent from my RS988 using Tapatalk
I think you might see that happen. After one of his returns, Zimmer was seriously hot and was yelling at a coach. Guessing it was Priefer.PurpleMustReign wrote:I think the STs are hurting the team too. Losing Patterson is an enormous loss and I think the Vikings didn't properly understand what he meant to the team. Just because someone is fast doesn't mean they can return kicks. I would hope they are telling mckinnon to kneel on the damn ball from now on.
Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
Treadwell has been the #3 since day 1 of the offseason808vikingsfan wrote:Was Treadwell in because he and Keenum have some chemistry playing with the #2s or is he finally going to get some quality playing time?
Love the way Cook runs.
I'm not very disappointed in the loss. It would have been nice to steal a win today but at least this loss in against the AFC. I'd sit Bradford next week too. They're going to need him in weeks 4-6 (DET,CHI,GB).
Treadwell is actually really good at run blocking. I really hope he pans out for the team because we all know they need blocking help.Pondering Her Percy wrote: Treadwell has been the #3 since day 1 of the offseason
Disagree 1000%. We went from having a fully healthy roster at home to our QB being out on the road. Did you expect us to look "good" yesterday with Keenum in?? Let me know how the Packers look without Rodgers. Or the Falcons look without Ryan. On the road no less. That does not one bit mean they are an average team. We went from a 71+% completion percentage team down to a 54% completion percentage team. That alone shows how much better Bradford is than Keenum. You cant sustain drives completing 54% of your passes. Man some of the comments I see on here at times really make me scratch my head. Especially when we loseVikingPaul73 wrote:Average teams look good at home against bad teams and look bad on the road against good teams
Agreed. I was really hard on Priefer about 4-5 years ago. Then cooled down because guys like CP, Sherels and Walsh (for a short stint) made him look good. For him to sit down and watch the last game and obviously not tell Jet to start taking a knee baffles me. He's not CP. Nowhere close. Take a knee. Either way, I've always thought Priefer was overrated as a coachAnd seriously this could be the worst ST I've seen. Illegal formation on FG defense ?? Seriously ? How does that even happen in the NFL? And Jet , please just kneel!!! It's painful watching him take it 9 yards deep out to the 15 time and time again. Just brutal
Trae'bust? Really? I'd rather not go down that road with you. Moving on.....And I really really hope Brock can pick up the defense quickly. Watching Trae'bust getting burned is getting old quickly
Agreed well saidmansquatch wrote:To me this is a game that shows the importance of competitive QB play. We lost because of penalties more than anything else. Despite giving up 14 points in the first half, we held Big Ben to something like 87 yards of passing in that half. Get rid of the penalties and we are in that game.
However, just like last season with the OL, the drop off between SB and Keenum was so severe that the teams margin for error ends up being close to zero.
I'm sure only having a week getting part time snaps didn't help either. Next week Keenum should be better assuming Bradford's knee continues to be an issue.
Not much more to say IMO, most of this game was just a crappy roll of the dice at the QB position. We knew PIT would score it's points and make some plays. Our defense was respectable in it's performance against an elite offense. We needed our offense to hold up it's end of the bargain to win this game and they just couldn't do it. Outside of a horseshoe like a defensive or ST score we were DOA.
Pondering Her Percy wrote:I'm not going to put much of this game on the OL. There were so many drop backs where Keenum just kept going backwards and not stepping up into the pocket so Pitts DEs were just rushing way outside to where our tackles couldn't reach them. That should be easy if we had a QB that would step up into the pocket
Agree as well......I would like to add that some of the issues we saw yesterday is directly related to coaching such as the special teams play.mansquatch wrote:To me this is a game that shows the importance of competitive QB play. We lost because of penalties more than anything else. Despite giving up 14 points in the first half, we held Big Ben to something like 87 yards of passing in that half. Get rid of the penalties and we are in that game.
However, just like last season with the OL, the drop off between SB and Keenum was so severe that the teams margin for error ends up being close to zero.
I'm sure only having a week getting part time snaps didn't help either. Next week Keenum should be better assuming Bradford's knee continues to be an issue.
Not much more to say IMO, most of this game was just a crappy roll of the dice at the QB position. We knew PIT would score it's points and make some plays. Our defense was respectable in it's performance against an elite offense. We needed our offense to hold up it's end of the bargain to win this game and they just couldn't do it. Outside of a horseshoe like a defensive or ST score we were DOA.
Excellent stats. Thanks for posting. Yes Bradford is better than Keenum and perhaps there is some truth to Keenum not stepping up properly in the pocket....but let's be honest, the OL was dominated and blown up yesterday. Yesterday brought back a lot of flashbacks from last year.halfgiz wrote:
Arif Hasan
@ArifHasanNFL
2h
Replying to @PFF
Reiff allowed four hurries, Remmers allowed four hurries and a sack, Easton allowed a hurry and two hits, Berger 2 hurries, Elflein 1 hurry
Case Keenum had 46% of his dropbacks come under pressure, according to @PFF - and had a QB rating of 46.9 on them. QB rating of 80.7 with clean pocket.
Also I have problem in the beginning of the game...We was playing to survive not to win.
Once they opened things up we started moving the ball.
mansquatch wrote: We lost because of penalties more than anything else. Despite giving up 14 points in the first half, we held Big Ben to something like 87 yards of passing in that half. Get rid of the penalties and we are in that game.
halfgiz wrote:
Arif Hasan
@ArifHasanNFL
2h
Replying to @PFF
Reiff allowed four hurries, Remmers allowed four hurries and a sack, Easton allowed a hurry and two hits, Berger 2 hurries, Elflein 1 hurry
Case Keenum had 46% of his dropbacks come under pressure, according to @PFF - and had a QB rating of 46.9 on them. QB rating of 80.7 with clean pocket.
Also I have problem in the beginning of the game...We was playing to survive not to win.
Once they opened things up we started moving the ball.