Page 17 of 17
Re: Vikings-Steelers Game Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:28 pm
by halfgiz
808vikingsfan wrote:
I agree. The Steelers have a good front 4 but they only recorded 2 sacks which is surprising. Keenum looked slow getting the ball out.
Arif Hasan
@ArifHasanNFL
2h
Replying to @PFF
Reiff allowed four hurries, Remmers allowed four hurries and a sack, Easton allowed a hurry and two hits, Berger 2 hurries, Elflein 1 hurry
Case Keenum had 46% of his dropbacks come under pressure, according to @PFF - and had a QB rating of 46.9 on them. 80.7 with clean pocket.
2:45 PM - 17 Sep 2017
Re: Vikings-Steelers Game Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:41 pm
by Hunter Morrow
Thats huge because Bradford is a very good QB under pressure. The first half would have had an opened up playcalling approach where I think we would have scored more points.
This team is going nowhere without Bradford.
Re: Vikings-Steelers Game Thread
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:42 pm
by PurpleKoolaid
Hunter Morrow wrote:Thats huge because Bradford is a very good QB under pressure. The first half would have had an opened up playcalling approach where I think we would have scored more points.
This team is going nowhere without Bradford.
I agree, without Bradford we may not have a winning season. What really scares me is if Bradford isnt as good under pressure for future games, because of his knee. I dont know if resting it will help. I hope the Vikings know some good knee specialists, Bradford has been so beat up his entire career. Can you imagine what the vikes would be like if we drafted him, and then got him the best Oline in the NFC.