View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Dec 17, 2017 8:52 am



Reply to topic  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
 Bradfords knee?? 
Author Message
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 23684
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
S197 wrote:
FireSpieldope wrote:
I'm not sure if Teddy can recover enough or not. It seems Bradford at best should be a backup QB. He was never great when healthy and he has a really bum left knee. He's a guy maybe you can go to for a few games if need be, but to count on him for an entire season or seasons, seems like a big risk.

Another reason why Spielman failed. Should have drafted a QB in the mid rounds last offseason. Missed on Dak Prescott who looks the part. The traded away the 1st rounder. Missed on Deshaun Watson (forget where he was picked exactly but another whiff).

I'd rather have Watson or Prescott then Bradford at this point. Other teams can get QB's, but the Vikings can't. I wonder why?


While I don't dislike Spielman anywhere near the level that you do, I do agree that his refusal to draft a mid-round QB has also been a criticism of mine. It seems like our QB's are 1st rounders or UDFA's with nothing in between. And not just last year, every year from what I can recall. It goes back to Favre, how the heck do you have a 40 year-old QB and no contingency plan? The guy is 40!

Seriously, who was the last QB taken in the mid-rounds? Please tell me it wasn't John David Booty. And no, Joe Webb doesn't count.


Does that really matter in the larger scheme of things? How often do QBs "hit" in the mid-rounds? I'm guessing less likely than other position groups. What's wrong with going the route of a vet backup like Keenum for the #2 spot and trying to develop a later-round guy? I suppose your "hit rate" even for a backup is lower. Still, I guess I'm in the camp of drafting a QB in R1-2 until you get your guy and spend rest of the draft capital elsewhere at a position that may have a higher hit rate and greater chance at playing time.

Again, that's just my strategy. I'm not sure one way is really that much better than another. It's all pretty much a crapshoot after the first couple of rounds. YMMV.

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:32 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
My thing comparing Teddy to Sam is that yes, I'll always be a Teddy fan but fans seem to forget, Teddy threw 28 tds in 2 years. Sam threw 20 in 15 games last year and only 5 picks compared to Teddys 9 and 12. Sam is also much more accurate than Teddy proving that again last year and has a stronger arm. When you put the two next to each other it's a no brainer that Sam is the better QB. Teddy is a winner, has great intangibles and can scramble but he's nowhere near the arm talent Sam is and Sam protects the football better no less has a quicker release.

If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week. But it just baffles me when guys say they are "Teddy" guys and say Sam is a bum and not worth a first. If you're a Teddy guy, why wouldn't you like Sam after looking at what I posted above?? I feel for Sam because he got a bad rep in St Louis but also played on horrid teams. He is a MUCH better QB than people think. Guys always say he can't win and all that stuff but put Teddy on those Rams teams. Is he winning? I can tell you now, no. They were terrible on both sides of the ball.

All in all, Teddy has shown no more than Sam ever has. Probably even less than Sam has. I like both QBs and think we can win with either one if the chips fall in our favor for once. This offseason will be interesting. Loaded QB class but it's no guarantee we land a good one so if Teddy proves to be healthy, I think we need to at least resign one of them and then draft one. I'm not up for going in to the draft blind without Teddy or Sam. A move like that could put us back in the gutter again. We need Teddy or Sam to start 2-3 years and then see if the rookie can take over in the meantime.

_________________
Image


Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:06 pm
Profile
Backup

Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:47 pm
Posts: 89
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
My thing comparing Teddy to Sam is that yes, I'll always be a Teddy fan but fans seem to forget, Teddy threw 28 tds in 2 years. Sam threw 20 in 15 games last year and only 5 picks compared to Teddys 9 and 12. Sam is also much more accurate than Teddy proving that again last year and has a stronger arm. When you put the two next to each other it's a no brainer that Sam is the better QB. Teddy is a winner, has great intangibles and can scramble but he's nowhere near the arm talent Sam is and Sam protects the football better no less has a quicker release.

If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week. But it just baffles me when guys say they are "Teddy" guys and say Sam is a bum and not worth a first. If you're a Teddy guy, why wouldn't you like Sam after looking at what I posted above?? I feel for Sam because he got a bad rep in St Louis but also played on horrid teams. He is a MUCH better QB than people think. Guys always say he can't win and all that stuff but put Teddy on those Rams teams. Is he winning? I can tell you now, no. They were terrible on both sides of the ball.

All in all, Teddy has shown no more than Sam ever has. Probably even less than Sam has. I like both QBs and think we can win with either one if the chips fall in our favor for once. This offseason will be interesting. Loaded QB class but it's no guarantee we land a good one so if Teddy proves to be healthy, I think we need to at least resign one of them and then draft one. I'm not up for going in to the draft blind without Teddy or Sam. A move like that could put us back in the gutter again. We need Teddy or Sam to start 2-3 years and then see if the rookie can take over in the meantime.


I agree with your analysis on the subject. However, this knee issue with Bradford is kind of spooky. I like them both. I think they can both lead a super bowl run, but neither is worth Stafford, Rodgers etc.... money. They need to be able to sign team friendly deals with there injury historys. They both need more weapons than the elite guys to be as successful. And it will also allow us to keep the defense together. I really would prefer Bridgwater if he can come back somewhere near where he was before the injury. The mobility is such an asset. Sinking some serious draft capital in a top teir QB in this draft would be a really good option IMO.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:23 am
Profile
Transition Player

Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 2:52 am
Posts: 391
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
720pete wrote:
FullWood wrote:
Are we looking into drafting a franchise quarterback?

We've been looking into drafting a franchise QB since Daunte Culpepper blew out his knee in 2005.

Potentially we did with Tavaris Jackson, Christian Ponder and Teddy Bridgewater.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:57 am
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
My thing comparing Teddy to Sam is that yes, I'll always be a Teddy fan but fans seem to forget, Teddy threw 28 tds in 2 years. Sam threw 20 in 15 games last year and only 5 picks compared to Teddys 9 and 12. Sam is also much more accurate than Teddy proving that again last year and has a stronger arm. When you put the two next to each other it's a no brainer that Sam is the better QB. Teddy is a winner, has great intangibles and can scramble but he's nowhere near the arm talent Sam is and Sam protects the football better no less has a quicker release.

If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week. But it just baffles me when guys say they are "Teddy" guys and say Sam is a bum and not worth a first. If you're a Teddy guy, why wouldn't you like Sam after looking at what I posted above?? I feel for Sam because he got a bad rep in St Louis but also played on horrid teams. He is a MUCH better QB than people think. Guys always say he can't win and all that stuff but put Teddy on those Rams teams. Is he winning? I can tell you now, no. They were terrible on both sides of the ball.

All in all, Teddy has shown no more than Sam ever has. Probably even less than Sam has. I like both QBs and think we can win with either one if the chips fall in our favor for once. This offseason will be interesting. Loaded QB class but it's no guarantee we land a good one so if Teddy proves to be healthy, I think we need to at least resign one of them and then draft one. I'm not up for going in to the draft blind without Teddy or Sam. A move like that could put us back in the gutter again. We need Teddy or Sam to start 2-3 years and then see if the rookie can take over in the meantime.


I'd compare Sam's first 2 years to Bridgewater's first 2 to be fair (Bradford 24TD, 24INT vs Bridgewater 28TD 21INT). Also, the Rams were not terrible. They had a pro bowl RB in Steven Jackson, defense actually ranked #10 in scoring in 2010. I won't argue that Sam will have better stats. He's definitely the better passer. Not sure if he's a better QB though. The jury is still out on Bradford on how he'll play in meaningful games when the game is on the line. Also,I cannot stress enough how important it is to have QB that can extend plays when things break down. 1 or 2 of these plays can make the difference between winning and losing.

Argument may be moot if neither can come back and play at 100%.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:02 am
Profile
Backup

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 10:35 am
Posts: 70
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
My thing comparing Teddy to Sam is that yes, I'll always be a Teddy fan but fans seem to forget, Teddy threw 28 tds in 2 years. Sam threw 20 in 15 games last year and only 5 picks compared to Teddys 9 and 12. Sam is also much more accurate than Teddy proving that again last year and has a stronger arm. When you put the two next to each other it's a no brainer that Sam is the better QB. Teddy is a winner, has great intangibles and can scramble but he's nowhere near the arm talent Sam is and Sam protects the football better no less has a quicker release.

If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week. But it just baffles me when guys say they are "Teddy" guys and say Sam is a bum and not worth a first. If you're a Teddy guy, why wouldn't you like Sam after looking at what I posted above?? I feel for Sam because he got a bad rep in St Louis but also played on horrid teams. He is a MUCH better QB than people think. Guys always say he can't win and all that stuff but put Teddy on those Rams teams. Is he winning? I can tell you now, no. They were terrible on both sides of the ball.

All in all, Teddy has shown no more than Sam ever has. Probably even less than Sam has. I like both QBs and think we can win with either one if the chips fall in our favor for once. This offseason will be interesting. Loaded QB class but it's no guarantee we land a good one so if Teddy proves to be healthy, I think we need to at least resign one of them and then draft one. I'm not up for going in to the draft blind without Teddy or Sam. A move like that could put us back in the gutter again. We need Teddy or Sam to start 2-3 years and then see if the rookie can take over in the meantime.


It's more Apples to Oranges though. Being that when Teddy was throwing, many times it was because the running game put them in 3rd and 8. He often was taking more risk attempting to get the first down and many times succeeding.

Bradford did not take many chances at all and I believe he also had the record for shortest attempted passes on avg. in history. So with the fewer INT's you also had the fewer first downs and points. The offense dropped from I believe 12th in PPD under Teddy to mid 20's under Sam.

The point is to score points and the offense was much better under Teddy. Then you can say, well Teddy had a running game and Sam didn't. Yeah, it was good or bad for the stats.

The biggest thing for me with Sam is that he is very poor evading the rush, moving in the pocket and making plays when the rush gets there. He is probably the easiest QB to sack in the NFl. You need a great OLine with Bradford to have a good offense because of his limited ability. He looks great with shorts on, but they play tackle on Sundays. That's why eventually teams figure out they can't win with him, hence why he was dumped twice. Has not had a winning season. Has not played in a playoff game. Has the poorest stats of any QB with 60 plus starts since 2010.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:46 am
Profile
Backup

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 10:35 am
Posts: 70
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
S197 wrote:
FireSpieldope wrote:
I'm not sure if Teddy can recover enough or not. It seems Bradford at best should be a backup QB. He was never great when healthy and he has a really bum left knee. He's a guy maybe you can go to for a few games if need be, but to count on him for an entire season or seasons, seems like a big risk.

Another reason why Spielman failed. Should have drafted a QB in the mid rounds last offseason. Missed on Dak Prescott who looks the part. The traded away the 1st rounder. Missed on Deshaun Watson (forget where he was picked exactly but another whiff).

I'd rather have Watson or Prescott then Bradford at this point. Other teams can get QB's, but the Vikings can't. I wonder why?


While I don't dislike Spielman anywhere near the level that you do, I do agree that his refusal to draft a mid-round QB has also been a criticism of mine. It seems like our QB's are 1st rounders or UDFA's with nothing in between. And not just last year, every year from what I can recall. It goes back to Favre, how the heck do you have a 40 year-old QB and no contingency plan? The guy is 40!

Seriously, who was the last QB taken in the mid-rounds? Please tell me it wasn't John David Booty. And no, Joe Webb doesn't count.


My opinion is that unless you are convinced your 2nd stringer is capable of playing extended time you should be looking to upgrade every year. The backup QB is actually one of the most important positions because obviously-

A) QB is the most important position of value on the team effecting the outcome by far the most.

B) Much of the time, the Starter will miss some to extensive time in any given season. Meaning your backup is now your starter.

I think the biggest thing with Spielman, going back to Ponder, is he didn't want any potential QB controversy so the backup was always quite a bit worse then the starter. Which again, overall I feel is detrimental to the overall success. Yeah, you give your 1st round pick more leash, and then that fails because you gave your 1st round pick more leash and he ends up sucking like Ponder. Then you got no one to even go to.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:06 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Alaskan wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
My thing comparing Teddy to Sam is that yes, I'll always be a Teddy fan but fans seem to forget, Teddy threw 28 tds in 2 years. Sam threw 20 in 15 games last year and only 5 picks compared to Teddys 9 and 12. Sam is also much more accurate than Teddy proving that again last year and has a stronger arm. When you put the two next to each other it's a no brainer that Sam is the better QB. Teddy is a winner, has great intangibles and can scramble but he's nowhere near the arm talent Sam is and Sam protects the football better no less has a quicker release.

If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week. But it just baffles me when guys say they are "Teddy" guys and say Sam is a bum and not worth a first. If you're a Teddy guy, why wouldn't you like Sam after looking at what I posted above?? I feel for Sam because he got a bad rep in St Louis but also played on horrid teams. He is a MUCH better QB than people think. Guys always say he can't win and all that stuff but put Teddy on those Rams teams. Is he winning? I can tell you now, no. They were terrible on both sides of the ball.

All in all, Teddy has shown no more than Sam ever has. Probably even less than Sam has. I like both QBs and think we can win with either one if the chips fall in our favor for once. This offseason will be interesting. Loaded QB class but it's no guarantee we land a good one so if Teddy proves to be healthy, I think we need to at least resign one of them and then draft one. I'm not up for going in to the draft blind without Teddy or Sam. A move like that could put us back in the gutter again. We need Teddy or Sam to start 2-3 years and then see if the rookie can take over in the meantime.


I agree with your analysis on the subject. However, this knee issue with Bradford is kind of spooky. I like them both. I think they can both lead a super bowl run, but neither is worth Stafford, Rodgers etc.... money. They need to be able to sign team friendly deals with there injury historys. They both need more weapons than the elite guys to be as successful. And it will also allow us to keep the defense together. I really would prefer Bridgwater if he can come back somewhere near where he was before the injury. The mobility is such an asset. Sinking some serious draft capital in a top teir QB in this draft would be a really good option IMO.


Agreed. My only thing is, I'm not a big Stafford guy. Talk about someone that cant win. 2 playoff appearances in how many years and no wins but every analysts talks him up like he's the next Tom Brady. I dont buy it. He hasnt proved anything and had one of the most dominant WRs in recent history on his team for a while

_________________
Image


Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:38 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
808vikingsfan wrote:
I'd compare Sam's first 2 years to Bridgewater's first 2 to be fair (Bradford 24TD, 24INT vs Bridgewater 28TD 21INT). Also, the Rams were not terrible. They had a pro bowl RB in Steven Jackson, defense actually ranked #10 in scoring in 2010. I won't argue that Sam will have better stats. He's definitely the better passer. Not sure if he's a better QB though. The jury is still out on Bradford on how he'll play in meaningful games when the game is on the line. Also,I cannot stress enough how important it is to have QB that can extend plays when things break down. 1 or 2 of these plays can make the difference between winning and losing.

Argument may be moot if neither can come back and play at 100%.


Comparing the first two years is fair. The Rams had one year of a decent defense. It was the same year they were in the playoff hunt but lost to Seattle week 17 to get knocked out. Outside of that, yes the Rams were terrible. I watched them a lot, my father is a die hard fan. Their OL was terrible and WRs/TEs were even worse. Steven Jackson was all that team had. You mention how Bradford will play in "meaningful" games but if you look, Teddy wasnt a whole lot better. Denver getting strip sacked to end the game, Arizona getting strip sacked to end the game. I mean it's not like Teddy went out there in big games and won them on his own very often if ever. That's the point I'm trying to make with Teddy. Seems like a lot of guys are on the Teddy train when in the end, he hasnt done much more than Bradford, possibly even less. Teddy had 1 year at 11-5 but had the best RB in football behind him. Sam never had that luxury with us. And again, he had the opportunity but of course Cook has to go down.

_________________
Image


Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:47 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
FireSpieldope wrote:
Being that when Teddy was throwing, many times it was because the running game put them in 3rd and 8. He often was taking more risk attempting to get the first down and many times succeeding.


Dude what?? He had a 1500+ rusher standing behind him in 2015. So when was the running game putting him at 3rd and 8??? Whatever that post is sounds like a poor excuse to be honest. I'm not sure where you even came up with what you said.

If the running game was putting him at 3rd and 8, they've must've been putting Sam at 3rd and 15 because Teddy had a lot more behind him than Sam did other than the 1 game he had with Cook. Sam had the worst running game in the NFL last year. Sam had a 99.3 QBR last year compared to Teddy's best at 88.7. Sam has a 70.3 completion percentage since he's left St. Louis. Which shatters Teddy's 64.9.

When you compare the two:

Sam has better:
-Accuracy
-Arm strength
-Release
-Vision

Teddy has better:
-Mobility
-Intangibles

I mean that probably sums it all up. I dont think a healthy Sam is THAT much better than a healthy Teddy but I still think Bradford is the better overall QB.

_________________
Image


Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:00 am
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:21 pm
Posts: 823
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
IMO Sam is done. I would be surprised if he doesn't go on IR soon.

I think it is the Keenum show for the rest of the year, there is a slim chance Teddy plays this year.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:27 am
Profile
Starting Wide Receiver
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 17794
Location: Crystal, MN
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
I'd say Sam has better pocket presence as well,although that may go hand-in-hand with less mobility.

Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk

_________________
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2016‬


Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:31 am
Profile YIM WWW
Backup

Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:47 pm
Posts: 89
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
808vikingsfan wrote:
I'd compare Sam's first 2 years to Bridgewater's first 2 to be fair (Bradford 24TD, 24INT vs Bridgewater 28TD 21INT). Also, the Rams were not terrible. They had a pro bowl RB in Steven Jackson, defense actually ranked #10 in scoring in 2010. I won't argue that Sam will have better stats. He's definitely the better passer. Not sure if he's a better QB though. The jury is still out on Bradford on how he'll play in meaningful games when the game is on the line. Also,I cannot stress enough how important it is to have QB that can extend plays when things break down. 1 or 2 of these plays can make the difference between winning and losing.

Argument may be moot if neither can come back and play at 100%.


Comparing the first two years is fair. The Rams had one year of a decent defense. It was the same year they were in the playoff hunt but lost to Seattle week 17 to get knocked out. Outside of that, yes the Rams were terrible. I watched them a lot, my father is a die hard fan. Their OL was terrible and WRs/TEs were even worse. Steven Jackson was all that team had. You mention how Bradford will play in "meaningful" games but if you look, Teddy wasnt a whole lot better. Denver getting strip sacked to end the game, Arizona getting strip sacked to end the game. I mean it's not like Teddy went out there in big games and won them on his own very often if ever. That's the point I'm trying to make with Teddy. Seems like a lot of guys are on the Teddy train when in the end, he hasnt done much more than Bradford, possibly even less. Teddy had 1 year at 11-5 but had the best RB in football behind him. Sam never had that luxury with us. And again, he had the opportunity but of course Cook has to go down.


Agreed, This argument may me moot if neither can come back at 100%.

If they are able to come back at or near where the use to be before injury its an interesting argument. I've seen the stats comparing the two, I've seen the both play on TV and in person and for me, Teddy is the guy I would choose. Especially in this system. The west coast system with this outside zone running scheme, Teddy at or near pre injury form would add ANOTHER dimension to this offense that would make this offense even more difficult to prepare for and defend. This system fits Teddy's skill set very well, much better than Norv's power run blocking, Air Coryell system (similar to what Cardinals run now). Norv's system didn't take full advantage of Teddy's skill set and for the most part, he played behind a historically horrible O line. Shurmer's system will, and it will give him more freedom at the line of scrimmage as well. The system fit is a much bigger thing than people care to acknowledge or understand. Teddy's ceiling in this system is much greater than Sam's IMO


Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:06 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10706
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
dead_poet wrote:
S197 wrote:
FireSpieldope wrote:
I'm not sure if Teddy can recover enough or not. It seems Bradford at best should be a backup QB. He was never great when healthy and he has a really bum left knee. He's a guy maybe you can go to for a few games if need be, but to count on him for an entire season or seasons, seems like a big risk.

Another reason why Spielman failed. Should have drafted a QB in the mid rounds last offseason. Missed on Dak Prescott who looks the part. The traded away the 1st rounder. Missed on Deshaun Watson (forget where he was picked exactly but another whiff).

I'd rather have Watson or Prescott then Bradford at this point. Other teams can get QB's, but the Vikings can't. I wonder why?


While I don't dislike Spielman anywhere near the level that you do, I do agree that his refusal to draft a mid-round QB has also been a criticism of mine. It seems like our QB's are 1st rounders or UDFA's with nothing in between. And not just last year, every year from what I can recall. It goes back to Favre, how the heck do you have a 40 year-old QB and no contingency plan? The guy is 40!

Seriously, who was the last QB taken in the mid-rounds? Please tell me it wasn't John David Booty. And no, Joe Webb doesn't count.


Does that really matter in the larger scheme of things? How often do QBs "hit" in the mid-rounds? I'm guessing less likely than other position groups. What's wrong with going the route of a vet backup like Keenum for the #2 spot and trying to develop a later-round guy? I suppose your "hit rate" even for a backup is lower. Still, I guess I'm in the camp of drafting a QB in R1-2 until you get your guy and spend rest of the draft capital elsewhere at a position that may have a higher hit rate and greater chance at playing time.

Again, that's just my strategy. I'm not sure one way is really that much better than another. It's all pretty much a crapshoot after the first couple of rounds. YMMV.


To me it matters. The Redskins are a good example, they literally sold the farm for RG3 but still drafted Kirk Cousins, which turned out to be a very wise move. I think the hit rate in general with QBs is low but you can still find your Russell Wilson's and Dak Prescott's of the world in mid rounds.

I don't have an issue with grabbing a 1st or 2nd rounder as your main guy, my issue is your development guy doesn't have to be a Heinicke or Sloter either. Taking a vet as a backup is pretty standard so that's fine with me but typically you know these types of guys are good for maybe a couple of games, it's highly unlikely they turn out to be your long term #1. You more or less know their ceiling.

You don't have to be all that prescient to know that Favre was at the end of his career. But we didn't draft anyone until he retired. Same with Ponder, Teddy was only drafted because it was abundantly clear Ponder wasn't the guy. And those voids result in filler like McNabb and Josh Freeman. Spielman is known for collecting draft picks, a strategy I'm not opposed to, but when you have 9 or 10 picks a year, can't we use one on a QB once in a while?

It just seems odd to me that the "build through the draft" strategy seems to apply to every position other than QB.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:55 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10706
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week.


I would too.

Unfortunately what we're likely to have for the rest of the year is a moderately healthy Sam or Teddy, at best. In that case, the scales start to tip towards the guy who can make plays with his feet. When Elflein got driven into the backfield on one of the Bear's sacks, Sam more or less just crumpled untouched. The DT was right there but Elflein was still between the two and he really made no effort to escape.

Later in the game Keenum picked up a crucial 1st down on 3rd and long with his feet. There's no way Bradford can make that run in his current condition. Of course the wildcard is will Teddy be mobile like he was pre-injury? That remains to be seen.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:07 pm
Profile
Backup

Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 10:35 am
Posts: 70
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
FireSpieldope wrote:
Being that when Teddy was throwing, many times it was because the running game put them in 3rd and 8. He often was taking more risk attempting to get the first down and many times succeeding.


Dude what?? He had a 1500+ rusher standing behind him in 2015. So when was the running game putting him at 3rd and 8??? Whatever that post is sounds like a poor excuse to be honest. I'm not sure where you even came up with what you said.

If the running game was putting him at 3rd and 8, they've must've been putting Sam at 3rd and 15 because Teddy had a lot more behind him than Sam did other than the 1 game he had with Cook. Sam had the worst running game in the NFL last year. Sam had a 99.3 QBR last year compared to Teddy's best at 88.7. Sam has a 70.3 completion percentage since he's left St. Louis. Which shatters Teddy's 64.9.

When you compare the two:

Sam has better:
-Accuracy
-Arm strength
-Release
-Vision

Teddy has better:
-Mobility
-Intangibles

I mean that probably sums it all up. I dont think a healthy Sam is THAT much better than a healthy Teddy but I still think Bradford is the better overall QB.


Teddy also has better pocket presence, leadership and I'll give him vision also.

The point is they relied heavily on the run in 2015, so IF the running game stalled a couple plays leaving 3rd and 8 it was up to Teddy to pick up the first down. I like how you ignored EVERYTHING else that goes to Teddy also. The offense was very predictable in 2015 which put more pressure on the passing game. Don't forget the OLine still sucked, so it's not like he had much time to throw either.


Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:35 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
808vikingsfan wrote:
I'd compare Sam's first 2 years to Bridgewater's first 2 to be fair (Bradford 24TD, 24INT vs Bridgewater 28TD 21INT). Also, the Rams were not terrible. They had a pro bowl RB in Steven Jackson, defense actually ranked #10 in scoring in 2010. I won't argue that Sam will have better stats. He's definitely the better passer. Not sure if he's a better QB though. The jury is still out on Bradford on how he'll play in meaningful games when the game is on the line. Also,I cannot stress enough how important it is to have QB that can extend plays when things break down. 1 or 2 of these plays can make the difference between winning and losing.

Argument may be moot if neither can come back and play at 100%.


Comparing the first two years is fair. The Rams had one year of a decent defense. It was the same year they were in the playoff hunt but lost to Seattle week 17 to get knocked out. Outside of that, yes the Rams were terrible. I watched them a lot, my father is a die hard fan. Their OL was terrible and WRs/TEs were even worse. Steven Jackson was all that team had. You mention how Bradford will play in "meaningful" games but if you look, Teddy wasnt a whole lot better. Denver getting strip sacked to end the game, Arizona getting strip sacked to end the game. I mean it's not like Teddy went out there in big games and won them on his own very often if ever. That's the point I'm trying to make with Teddy. Seems like a lot of guys are on the Teddy train when in the end, he hasnt done much more than Bradford, possibly even less. Teddy had 1 year at 11-5 but had the best RB in football behind him. Sam never had that luxury with us. And again, he had the opportunity but of course Cook has to go down.


Although I agree Peterson was a big factor in the 11-5 season, what happened to all the other seasons when he was here? Like I mentioned before, Peterson was here for a long time. In that time, the Vikings had only one season with a better record (Favre) and that was a pretty magical season. Maybe it doesn't jump out on a stat sheet, but I believe Teddy had a lot to do with the Vikings reaching the 11 win mark.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:09 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
S197 wrote:
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
If I had a choice I pick a healthy Sam over a healthy Teddy any day of the week.


I would too.

Unfortunately what we're likely to have for the rest of the year is a moderately healthy Sam or Teddy, at best. In that case, the scales start to tip towards the guy who can make plays with his feet. When Elflein got driven into the backfield on one of the Bear's sacks, Sam more or less just crumpled untouched. The DT was right there but Elflein was still between the two and he really made no effort to escape.

Later in the game Keenum picked up a crucial 1st down on 3rd and long with his feet. There's no way Bradford can make that run in his current condition. Of course the wildcard is will Teddy be mobile like he was pre-injury? That remains to be seen.


3 of the 4 sacks could have been avoided with a healthy QB IMO. Even his handoffs looked half-*ssed from the start. He shouldn't have been out there. You could tell he was hurting.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:26 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
808vikingsfan wrote:

Although I agree Peterson was a big factor in the 11-5 season, what happened to all the other seasons when he was here? Like I mentioned before, Peterson was here for a long time. In that time, the Vikings had only one season with a better record (Favre) and that was a pretty magical season. Maybe it doesn't jump out on a stat sheet, but I believe Teddy had a lot to do with the Vikings reaching the 11 win mark.


Oh I agree. I said it before, Teddy is a winner. But if you have Cook or a non-washed up Peterson behind Bradford for a whole season, do you believe he could go 11-5 or better?? I sure do. Teddy's stats dont pop but he found ways to win

_________________
Image


Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:43 am
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
808vikingsfan wrote:

Although I agree Peterson was a big factor in the 11-5 season, what happened to all the other seasons when he was here? Like I mentioned before, Peterson was here for a long time. In that time, the Vikings had only one season with a better record (Favre) and that was a pretty magical season. Maybe it doesn't jump out on a stat sheet, but I believe Teddy had a lot to do with the Vikings reaching the 11 win mark.


Oh I agree. I said it before, Teddy is a winner. But if you have Cook or a non-washed up Peterson behind Bradford for a whole season, do you believe he could go 11-5 or better?? I sure do. Teddy's stats dont pop but he found ways to win



I really don't know Bradford could've lead the 2015 Vikings to 11 wins or more. In 2009, the Vikings had Favre who threw for over 4200yds. They had Peterson and Chester Taylor. They had Sidney, Percy, Shiancoe. They had the Williams wall and Jared Allen. That team was stacked. Yet they only won one more game than the 2015 Vikings. Do you know how many times the Vikings won 11 or more since 1977? Six. Only 6 times in 40 years. It's rare for a Vikings team to get to 11 wins. Yet we somehow think all you need is a stud RB, a QB that can rack up stats and 11 wins should be rather easy. It's not.

So I can honestly say I really don't know if the team would be better with Bradford. I like him. I like how he can fit his throws into small windows. I like his deep ball. I like how he hangs in the pocket. But to me, Sam is still an unknown when it comes to a successful season. Those awful years in St. Louis. Maybe Sam gave up too? Maybe he was part of the cancer? I've never played organized football before but I have to think if things are going bad, having a QB that can be positive in the huddle can make a big difference compared to a QB like Cutler. I think the leadership part of a QB is something that needs to be taken into account when teams are successful as well as when they tank.

Eh. I really don't know what I'm trying to say. I like Bradford (healthy). I like Bridgewater. I like Case too. Heck, even Sloter gets me a little excited. I just want the Vikings to find a really good QB that can start 16 games a few years in a row.

_________________
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014


Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:26 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
808vikingsfan wrote:

Eh. I really don't know what I'm trying to say. I like Bradford (healthy). I like Bridgewater. I like Case too. Heck, even Sloter gets me a little excited. I just want the Vikings to find a really good QB that can start 16 games a few years in a row.


:lol: At least you're being honest!! I agree. There isnt a QB on this roster I dont like. It's just we've gotten hit with the bad luck bug again

_________________
Image


Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:00 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Posts: 8071
Location: Kentucky
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
808vikingsfan wrote:

Eh. I really don't know what I'm trying to say. I like Bradford (healthy). I like Bridgewater. I like Case too. Heck, even Sloter gets me a little excited. I just want the Vikings to find a really good QB that can start 16 games a few years in a row.


:lol: At least you're being honest!! I agree. There isnt a QB on this roster I dont like. It's just we've gotten hit with the bad luck bug again


There isn't one I don't like but Teddy being able to come back completely healthy (body and mind) has the most upside in my opinion. Bradford is older and has a long injury history - it's basically impossible for him to come back completely healthy with all of the damage to that knee. Though it was severe, this was Bridgewater's first injury. Case is a backup precisely because he can't maintain a high level of play game in and game out.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if none of them were the starter going into next season.

_________________
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson


Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:55 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Posts: 3303
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Drew Brees UFA in 2018. Just say'in.

_________________
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi


Fri Oct 13, 2017 1:58 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
Posts: 7236
Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Norv Zimmer wrote:
IMO Sam is done. I would be surprised if he doesn't go on IR soon.

I think it is the Keenum show for the rest of the year, there is a slim chance Teddy plays this year.


I said that two weeks ago and it's coming true. Keenum is the man like it or not


Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:12 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
Posts: 7236
Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
mansquatch wrote:
Drew Brees UFA in 2018. Just say'in.

I'd be for that as long as we drafted and groomed a QB for the next three years. Trade Diggs for him, he can't stay healthy and stay on the field. Anthony Carter was his size or smaller and he stayed on the field and was a Better WR than digs too.


Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:15 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
Posts: 7976
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
What is the winning percentage between Sam and Teddy. Thats the stat that matter. Teddy NEVER got to play behind an Oline which we have today either. Sam is just an injury waiting to happen.


Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:08 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Inductee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Posts: 4618
Location: Watertown, NY
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
Laserman wrote:
mansquatch wrote:
Drew Brees UFA in 2018. Just say'in.

I'd be for that as long as we drafted and groomed a QB for the next three years. Trade Diggs for him, he can't stay healthy and stay on the field. Anthony Carter was his size or smaller and he stayed on the field and was a Better WR than digs too.


lol trade Diggs for a guy thats about to be a free agent this coming year? Uhhhh??? :shock:

_________________
Image


Sun Oct 22, 2017 10:42 pm
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:07 pm
Posts: 546
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
What is the winning percentage between Sam and Teddy. Thats the stat that matter. Teddy NEVER got to play behind an Oline which we have today either. Sam is just an injury waiting to happen.


Bradford is 8-8 I believe. He won 1 game this season and 7 games last season. Teddy all time is 17-11.


Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:35 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Posts: 1391
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
720pete wrote:
PurpleKoolaid wrote:
What is the winning percentage between Sam and Teddy. Thats the stat that matter. Teddy NEVER got to play behind an Oline which we have today either. Sam is just an injury waiting to happen.


Bradford is 8-8 I believe. He won 1 game this season and 7 games last season. Teddy all time is 17-11.

Don't look now but Case is 4-2! We would be happy if any one of the qb's has that record.

_________________
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter


Mon Oct 23, 2017 8:06 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
Posts: 1618
Post Re: Bradfords knee??
With Sam Bradford (knee) also on the mend, Rapoport mentioned that the Vikings could be rapidly approaching a Week 10 scenario where Bradford, Bridgewater and interim starter Case Keenum are all healthy at once.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... e-earliest


Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:33 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 387 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.