2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

mansquatch
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Coon Rapids, MN

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by mansquatch » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:01 pm

Kapp was right about the sarcasm, but I've always had a soft spot for Jim so didn't want to get on him too hard.

The new Tackles ARE average players. No one is out here asserting that these guys are Joe Thomas level players. However, last year we saw guys who were literally the worst in the league. If Reiff and Remmers boost us to average or even slightly below average it will still be a material improvement over what we saw in 2016. (At RT will be better than it has been since maybe 2014.) That is a reason in of itself to be optimistic.

Why do people feel they overpaid? Matt Kalil got paid Joe Thomas levels in Carolina, an absolutely insane contract for a player of his pedigree. In the market they Vikings have to pay market value, so the contracts were richer than maybe we wanted. If we had paid at market we would have gotten no one. That would mean starting TJ Clemmings for a 3rd year and IMO THAT more than just about anything else would constitute GM negligence.

I agree they haven't proven a darn thing yet and that is fair. But there are valid reasons beyond the Kool-Aid to think this team (if healthy) has a chance to make a run at the whole thing.
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 37384
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by Mothman » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:23 pm

mansquatch wrote:Kapp was right about the sarcasm, but I've always had a soft spot for Jim so didn't want to get on him too hard.
Aw, shucks. I have a soft spot for you too.
The new Tackles ARE average players. No one is out here asserting that these guys are Joe Thomas level players. However, last year we saw guys who were literally the worst in the league. If Reiff and Remmers boost us to average or even slightly below average it will still be a material improvement over what we saw in 2016. (At RT will be better than it has been since maybe 2014.) That is a reason in of itself to be optimistic.
It's certainly a reason to expect improved performance at the position.
Why do people feel they overpaid? Matt Kalil got paid Joe Thomas levels in Carolina, an absolutely insane contract for a player of his pedigree. In the market they Vikings have to pay market value, so the contracts were richer than maybe we wanted. If we had paid at market we would have gotten no one. That would mean starting TJ Clemmings for a 3rd year and IMO THAT more than just about anything else would constitute GM negligence.
You kind of answered your own question there. The free agent market drives up the price at positions where demand is greater than supply so I suppose whether they overpaid or not depends on we look at it. If we look at the going rate for starting free agent tackles in their late 20s, they basically paid market price. On the other hand, Reiff's contract is bigger than that of Kalil or Thomas. He's now the 8th highest-paid left tackle in the NFL and I think we can probably agree that Reiff is not the 8th best tackle in the NFL. In that sense, the Vikes overpaid.

The same idea applies to Remmers. $6 million a year seems steep for him, at least to me. However, I understand that right tackles aren't cheap. Overall, on paper, the Vikes paid almost $89 million for Remmers and Reiff (about $37 million guaranteed). Doesn't that sound high?
I agree they haven't proven a darn thing yet and that is fair. But there are valid reasons beyond the Kool-Aid to think this team (if healthy) has a chance to make a run at the whole thing.
There are... I just don't think it's such a given that the board needs to become divided about it. There are valid reasons to doubt they'll make a run like that too and nobody knows what will happen so I think we should all be able to respect where each fan's expectations fall within that range of possibilities.

User avatar
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 11288
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by S197 » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:39 pm

The way the cap works you can't look at it in absolute dollars. If you do, everyone signed will be one of the highest paid in the league, it's the nature of how deals are structured. When is the last time someone who was signed in the first couple days of free agency did someone say, "Wow that was an amazing deal!" Almost never.

Contracts are front heavy so players starting a new contract are always paid more than a guy in the middle or ending of their contract. To me, the apples/apples way to compare is to compare a signing to other signings in the same year. Otherwise the stats will always be skewed.

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 37384
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by Mothman » Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:52 pm

S197 wrote:The way the cap works you can't look at it in absolute dollars. If you do, everyone signed will be one of the highest paid in the league, it's the nature of how deals are structured.


That's why I mentioned the guaranteed money. I didn't go into further detail because I didn't want write an essay on the subject but I'm aware of the details.
Contracts are front heavy so players starting a new contract are always paid more than a guy in the middle or ending of their contract. To me, the apples/apples way to compare is to compare a signing to other signings in the same year. Otherwise the stats will always be skewed.
That's a fair point. Reiff got more than any tackle signed this year, although Okung will earn a higher average per season. The only right tackle who received more than Remmers is Wagner, who will make considerably more. However, Remmers is now the 10th highest-paid RT in the league.

By pretty much any standard, the Vikes paid premium prices for these two players.

User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11575
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by jackal » Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:09 pm


That's a fair point. Reiff got more than any tackle signed this year, although Okung will earn a higher average per season. The only right tackle who received more than Remmers is Wagner, who will make considerably more. However, Remmers is now the 10th highest-paid RT in the league.

By pretty much any standard, the Vikes paid premium prices for these two players.

There is a league wide shortage on LT and RT's and generally on OL in general.
I don't mind the Vikings grabbing guys that they really need.. not to mention Kalil
got paid huge money last year to sit on the bench and so did Peterson pretty much.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!

User avatar
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 11288
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by S197 » Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:51 pm

Mothman wrote:

That's why I mentioned the guaranteed money. I didn't go into further detail because I didn't want write an essay on the subject but I'm aware of the details.
That's a fair point. Reiff got more than any tackle signed this year, although Okung will earn a higher average per season. The only right tackle who received more than Remmers is Wagner, who will make considerably more. However, Remmers is now the 10th highest-paid RT in the league.

By pretty much any standard, the Vikes paid premium prices for these two players.
10th highest isn't too bad to me as most free agents get bumped to the top of the list. As an example, Harrison Smith was the highest paid safety, now it's Eric Berry, next year it will be someone else. It's the nature of an inflationary cap. Also, isn't Remmers deal basically year to year? That's another big factor.

My point is anytime you're signing a FA starter, it's almost always perceived as paying a premium. It's very very rare for someone to say "what a steal!" when talking about a significant FA signing. It's almost always the opposite. I'm not disagreeing that the Vikings paid a lot for these players, just that paying a lot for players is the norm.

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 37384
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by Mothman » Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:09 pm

S197 wrote:10th highest isn't too bad to me as most free agents get bumped to the top of the list. As an example, Harrison Smith was the highest paid safety, now it's Eric Berry, next year it will be someone else. It's the nature of an inflationary cap. Also, isn't Remmers deal basically year to year? That's another big factor.
It is but, for example, if he doesn't pan out after the first year, that will mean the Vikes paid $10.5 million for one year of Mike Remmers at tackle.
My point is anytime you're signing a FA starter, it's almost always perceived as paying a premium. It's very very rare for someone to say "what a steal!" when talking about a significant FA signing. It's almost always the opposite. I'm not disagreeing that the Vikings paid a lot for these players, just that paying a lot for players is the norm.
I agree. It's the norm. I'm simply responding to Mansquatch's question about why people think the Vikes overpaid for their two new tackles. People think they overpaid because inflationary cap or not, the price they paid isn't commensurate with the talent they're getting in return, which is why they shouldn't have put themselves in a desperate position in the first place. However, viewed purely in terms of what it costs to sign free agents, they paid market price.

User avatar
IIsweet
Transition Player
Posts: 376
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:02 pm

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by IIsweet » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:22 am

If the Vikings didn't pay them this type of money, someone else would have !
Then we would be complaining about how we missed on everything !

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 37384
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by Mothman » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:40 am

IIsweet wrote:If the Vikings didn't pay them this type of money, someone else would have !
Then we would be complaining about how we missed on everything !
It's just a discussion about the price of the two linemen. Saying the Vikes overpaid isn't the same as complaining that they shouldn't have signed them at all. It's simply saying they overpaid, which they did. That's a common result when relying on free agency to fill important positions and it's why teams prefer to build through the draft. Free agency tends to involve overpaying for players.

User avatar
halfgiz
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by halfgiz » Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:49 am

The Vikings got themselves into a bine at both tackle spots. I think Rick was planning on signing Kalil to a reasonable contract. And when Kalil signed that big contract with the Panthers it probably messed Ricks plan up.

We really needed a LT and Rick paid the price.
Now the big question in my mind is...what's Sparano going to do with the line this year. Hopefully with better players he will get something out of them.
Kind of anxious to see what running back we take in draft.
Will we take a TE in the draft, or a WR or maybe both.

I still think our first pick will be a defensive player.

User avatar
VikingPaul73
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2923
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by VikingPaul73 » Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:05 am

It seems like the Rick supporters are saying "Don't blame Rick Spielman for overpaying for mediocre tackles, the Vikings were in a situation where they HAD to overpay for tackles" ......without acknowledging the root cause of why the Vikings were in the situation to begin with......Rick Spielman



I think Moth summed it up perfectly with his post highlighting the 3 categories of Vikings fans on this topic.....Count me in the #3 group.

User avatar
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 18398
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
Contact:

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by PurpleMustReign » Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:33 am

VikingPaul73 wrote:It seems like the Rick supporters are saying "Don't blame Rick Spielman for overpaying for mediocre tackles, the Vikings were in a situation where they HAD to overpay for tackles" ......without acknowledging the root cause of why the Vikings were in the situation to begin with......Rick Spielman



I think Moth summed it up perfectly with his post highlighting the 3 categories of Vikings fans on this topic.....Count me in the #3 group.
Agreed. Rick has not adequately addressed the OL since he started here. Out best line since we drafted AD was when we signed Hutchinson, and iirc that was before Spielman.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2017 #BringitHome‬

User avatar
FrenchVikes
Waterboy
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:27 am
Location: Paris, France

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by FrenchVikes » Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:51 am

So since Spielman came in Minnesota, he never made an effort to improve the oline ? (I'm a new fan ;))
If that's true, he should wake up one day because you can't go really far if your QB has no protection.

User avatar
Rhodes Closed
Starter
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:21 am
Location: Sleepy Eye, Minnesota

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by Rhodes Closed » Sat Mar 18, 2017 1:13 pm

I think saying Spielman never tried to improve our offensive line is a bit of a misnomer. I think it's fairer to say the attempts at fixing the line haven't panned out.

User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am

Re: 2017 Vikings Free Agency Thread (Discussion Thread)

Post by Texas Vike » Sat Mar 18, 2017 1:21 pm

Rhodes Closed wrote:I think saying Spielman never tried to improve our offensive line is a bit of a misnomer. I think it's fairer to say the attempts at fixing the line haven't panned out.

I'd depict it thus: his attempts have been lazy and negligent, like putting a Snoopy bandaid on a open wound that needs stitches.

Post Reply