View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:40 pm



Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 Thoughts on the crapfest 
Author Message
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Here's the bad news:

As Vikings lost one-on-one matchups, Eagles forced Sam Bradford's fumbles

Quote:
The zone blitzes the Eagles had prepared for Bradford worked, but they weren't used in heavy doses. "I think we only ran two of those throughout the game," safety Malcolm Jenkins said. "One ended up being a sack and I think the other one, he threw it away." And while the Eagles knew how to fluster Bradford with coverage disguises, their biggest defensive plays in a 21-10 win came from something else.

On two of Bradford's four fumbles, the Eagles sent a four-man pressure. They sent five defenders after him the other two times, but the Vikings had more blockers than Philadelphia did pass-rushers. The Eagles' advantage on the game's biggest plays flowed from plain, simple execution -- and a lack of it from the Vikings.

"It's not the scheme," said ESPN analyst and former NFL defensive back Matt Bowen. "This is all about one-on-one blocking. ... They just got beat."


There's some very nice analysis of the game at the link above.


Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:49 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
CbusVikesFan wrote:
Jim,
you and I have seen a ton of Vikings football. We have seen many lineups trotted out there for us to behold. Some have been really good and some really bad.I am not sure how it has gotten to be this putrid, but one thing is for sure. The eagles have a pretty good defense in their own right. And they game planned accordingly. Knowing that, I am not sure how the Vikings came up with any counter punches. The whole team should take the blame, they were outcoached and outplayed.
If the team was built from the inside out, there wouldn't be so much conversation about the offensive line.



Somehow I missed this post! Sorry...

Yes, we've seen a ton of Vikings football (and a ton of football, period). :) I'm hard-pressed to think of a time in Vikes history when the OL has looked worse than this one does. I'm not sure how the team can effectively counterpunch when execution seems to be the main problem. Regardless of what they try to do on offense, players need to execute for it to work.


Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:52 am
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Posts: 5528
Location: The Great White North
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Mothman wrote:
Here's the bad news:

As Vikings lost one-on-one matchups, Eagles forced Sam Bradford's fumbles

Quote:
The zone blitzes the Eagles had prepared for Bradford worked, but they weren't used in heavy doses. "I think we only ran two of those throughout the game," safety Malcolm Jenkins said. "One ended up being a sack and I think the other one, he threw it away." And while the Eagles knew how to fluster Bradford with coverage disguises, their biggest defensive plays in a 21-10 win came from something else.

On two of Bradford's four fumbles, the Eagles sent a four-man pressure. They sent five defenders after him the other two times, but the Vikings had more blockers than Philadelphia did pass-rushers. The Eagles' advantage on the game's biggest plays flowed from plain, simple execution -- and a lack of it from the Vikings.

"It's not the scheme," said ESPN analyst and former NFL defensive back Matt Bowen. "This is all about one-on-one blocking. ... They just got beat."


There's some very nice analysis of the game at the link above.


If it had been happening all year like it did last Sunday I'd be worried, but I'm just not. The OL hasn't been great but the Vikes have been moving the ball and scoring despite that. In my view, 1 out of 6 games they were soundly beaten both in terms of coaching and execution. In the other 5 they've held their own for the most part, or at least didn't look any worse than the teams they played against did against the Vikings defensive front 7.

Now if more games start to resemble what we saw against Philly it will be time to punch the panic button, but I just don't see that happening. I think a more likely explanation is that Philly got manhandled on defense by the Redskins the week before and their defensive players compensated for that against the Vikings who were just not mentally ready for that kind of response. They knew what they would face in terms of overall defense from the Eagles and their players, but were not prepared to match their intensity and it showed. And, I'd say it's a LOT more likely we'll see the Vikings offense respond similarly after their drubbing against the Bears than we will see the Bears embarrass the Vikings offense again.

But we'll see. It's just not enough data to say the OL sucks and the Vikings are doomed.


Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:39 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
VikingLord wrote:
If it had been happening all year like it did last Sunday I'd be worried, but I'm just not.


It has been happening all year!

Quote:
The OL hasn't been great but the Vikes have been moving the ball and scoring despite that.


Yes, they've done it so well that they have the 31st-ranked offense in the league. They've scored 10 offensive TDs. Only Houston has scored fewer and the Vikes aren't exactly leading the league in made field goals either.

Quote:
Now if more games start to resemble what we saw against Philly it will be time to punch the panic button, but I just don't see that happening. I think a more likely explanation is that Philly got manhandled on defense by the Redskins the week before and their defensive players compensated for that against the Vikings who were just not mentally ready for that kind of response. They knew what they would face in terms of overall defense from the Eagles and their players, but were not prepared to match their intensity and it showed. And, I'd say it's a LOT more likely we'll see the Vikings offense respond similarly after their drubbing against the Bears than we will see the Bears embarrass the Vikings offense again.

But we'll see. It's just not enough data to say the OL sucks and the Vikings are doomed.


I haven't said they're doomed. I haven't punched the "panic button" either but we have 6 games of data indicating that the 2016 line is a problem, not just one. That seems worthy of discussion. :confused:


Wed Oct 26, 2016 5:10 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Posts: 1369
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Mothman wrote:
CbusVikesFan wrote:
Jim,
you and I have seen a ton of Vikings football. We have seen many lineups trotted out there for us to behold. Some have been really good and some really bad.I am not sure how it has gotten to be this putrid, but one thing is for sure. The eagles have a pretty good defense in their own right. And they game planned accordingly. Knowing that, I am not sure how the Vikings came up with any counter punches. The whole team should take the blame, they were outcoached and outplayed.
If the team was built from the inside out, there wouldn't be so much conversation about the offensive line.



Somehow I missed this post! Sorry...

Yes, we've seen a ton of Vikings football (and a ton of football, period). :) I'm hard-pressed to think of a time in Vikes history when the OL has looked worse than this one does. I'm not sure how the team can effectively counterpunch when execution seems to be the main problem. Regardless of what they try to do on offense, players need to execute for it to work.

Lol, not like I said anything prophetic.

_________________
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter


Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:34 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
CbusVikesFan wrote:
Mothman wrote:
CbusVikesFan wrote:
Jim,
you and I have seen a ton of Vikings football. We have seen many lineups trotted out there for us to behold. Some have been really good and some really bad.I am not sure how it has gotten to be this putrid, but one thing is for sure. The eagles have a pretty good defense in their own right. And they game planned accordingly. Knowing that, I am not sure how the Vikings came up with any counter punches. The whole team should take the blame, they were outcoached and outplayed.
If the team was built from the inside out, there wouldn't be so much conversation about the offensive line.



Somehow I missed this post! Sorry...

Yes, we've seen a ton of Vikings football (and a ton of football, period). :) I'm hard-pressed to think of a time in Vikes history when the OL has looked worse than this one does. I'm not sure how the team can effectively counterpunch when execution seems to be the main problem. Regardless of what they try to do on offense, players need to execute for it to work.

Lol, not like I said anything prophetic.


:lol: No, but you did provide a good perspective. :)


Thu Oct 27, 2016 11:36 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Ouch.

Vikings’ tackle rotation vs. Eagles ‘a horrible decision,’ analyst says


Thu Oct 27, 2016 12:35 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:24 am
Posts: 1506
Location: south minneapolis
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest


It was at least encouraging that he seems to think Long can still be an asset.

_________________
"My anterior orifice is forever causing me extreme difficulty;
therefore, I shall endeavor to acquire some self-control."


Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:29 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10511
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
PsyDanny wrote:


It was at least encouraging that he seems to think Long can still be an asset.


On the play where Long gave up the strip sack, he actually set up the edge pretty well, the DE had to make a very wide arc, which normally a QB can step up out of the way from. Unfortunately the interior also collapsed so there was nowhere to go. I tried to focus a bit on him and his first step still looks good, just unsure if the strength is still there.


Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:39 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
PsyDanny wrote:


It was at least encouraging that he seems to think Long can still be an asset.



I agree. I'm trying to make that my main takeaway from the article. :)


Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:46 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Posts: 1696
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Wish we could get Staley or Thomas without totally suffocating our future. A line like this would look goods pretty good on paper:

LT: Thomas/Staley
LG: Boone
C: Berger
RG: Fusco
RT: Long/Clemmings


Thu Oct 27, 2016 1:56 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Posts: 5528
Location: The Great White North
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Mothman wrote:
VikingLord wrote:
If it had been happening all year like it did last Sunday I'd be worried, but I'm just not.


It has been happening all year!


So Bradford has been getting strip-sacked all year and pressured into turnovers like he was against the Eagles? They've struggled to be sure, but they haven't struggled to that degree.

Mothman wrote:
I haven't said they're doomed. I haven't punched the "panic button" either but we have 6 games of data indicating that the 2016 line is a problem, not just one. That seems worthy of discussion. :confused:


In my view there is a clear difference between what we saw against the Eagles and what we've seen in the other games from both the offensive line, the offense overall, and the team overall (including the defense). I just don't agree that the Eagles game was typical in any respect from what we've seen in the other 5 games. I think that performance was an outlier across-the-board that will not be repeated again. If I'm wrong I'll admit it, but I think the Vikings will look markedly better in every phase going forward.


Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:20 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Posts: 1369
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
:lol: No, but you did provide a good perspective. :)

thank you sir! I am along with you finding it hard think when the O Line was this porous. But recent years it has only declined further into the abyss. Years of neglect have taken a toll on the whole team and has been a long ways back to this point.
I'm trying to forget last week and chalk it up to just being a crappy game.

_________________
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter


Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:18 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
VikingLord wrote:
So Bradford has been getting strip-sacked all year and pressured into turnovers like he was against the Eagles?


No, that's not what I meant. I posted a quote from an article and highlighted the following in bold:

Quote:
"The Eagles' advantage on the game's biggest plays flowed from plain, simple execution -- and a lack of it from the Vikings.

"It's not the scheme," said ESPN analyst and former NFL defensive back Matt Bowen. "This is all about one-on-one blocking. ... They just got beat."


Vikings linemen have been losing one-on-one battles and failing to execute all year. Just because those failures didn't specifically result in strip sacks or turnovers doesn't mean the problem isn't essentially the same. That lack of execution has resulted in numerous negative plays: sacks, big hits on the QB, running plays repeatedly stuffed for no gain or negative yardage.

Quote:
In my view there is a clear difference between what we saw against the Eagles and what we've seen in the other games from both the offensive line, the offense overall, and the team overall (including the defense). I just don't agree that the Eagles game was typical in any respect from what we've seen in the other 5 games. I think that performance was an outlier across-the-board that will not be repeated again. If I'm wrong I'll admit it, but I think the Vikings will look markedly better in every phase going forward.


Maybe they will but in terms of the offensive line's performance, that game was not an outlier. It was typical. The end result of a play doesn't change how a lineman performed on that play. If a lineman fails to execute and loses a one-on-one battle, that's simply what happened. The play might result in anything from a strip sack to a sack to a hit to a 20 yard gain but it doesn't change the fact that the assignment was blown. Going all the way back to week 1, when the Titans were, on average, hitting Vikings RBs within less than a yard after they first touched the ball, we've seen poor execution from the line. Sometimes it's been worse in the passing game, sometimes in the running game but with the exception of the Giants game, where the line was okay, their performance has been bad.


Thu Oct 27, 2016 4:10 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
CbusVikesFan wrote:
thank you sir! I am along with you finding it hard think when the O Line was this porous. But recent years it has only declined further into the abyss. Years of neglect have taken a toll on the whole team and has been a long ways back to this point.
I'm trying to forget last week and chalk it up to just being a crappy game.


Well, the team as a whole certainly played worse than usual. Hopefully, even the o-line is probably capable of a better performance than that!


Thu Oct 27, 2016 4:14 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
Posts: 1269
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
that projection does NOT look good as Fusco is subpar, Clemmings has not panned out in any way, and Long is very uncertain.....we need more then just one addl quality guy at OL


Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:37 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Posts: 1369
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Mothman wrote:
CbusVikesFan wrote:
thank you sir! I am along with you finding it hard think when the O Line was this porous. But recent years it has only declined further into the abyss. Years of neglect have taken a toll on the whole team and has been a long ways back to this point.
I'm trying to forget last week and chalk it up to just being a crappy game.


Well, the team as a whole certainly played worse than usual. Hopefully, even the o-line is probably capable of a better performance than that!

If they have a thread of pride in their profession hopefully they are capable of doing a much better job. That includes the rest of the offense. Especially Sammy Boy.

_________________
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter


Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:44 am
Profile
Franchise Player

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:03 am
Posts: 418
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
S197 wrote:
On the play where Long gave up the strip sack, he actually set up the edge pretty well, the DE had to make a very wide arc, which normally a QB can step up out of the way from. Unfortunately the interior also collapsed so there was nowhere to go. I tried to focus a bit on him and his first step still looks good, just unsure if the strength is still there.


I am not sure if i am thinking of the same play, but if its the one i was thinking of, Long had two guys to chose from and it seems he was unsure if he should block the DE or the DB. Like he didn't know who the RB was going to block so he was hesitant to block the DE and allow the free rusher inside. Could be one of those "gel" things.

I haven't had a chance to chime in yet, its a bit late, but why not now?

Correct me if i am wrong, but i believe that all Bradfords fumbles came as he as about to throw the ball, one more fraction of a second or one more inch and those balls would've been away and could've resulted in first downs or touchdowns. Football truly is a game of inches. I would be more concerned if he was getting sacked before he could find an open receiver. (I am concerned, the O-line was ugly, just looking for any bright spot).

The 3rd and short (and 4th and short) were doomed by the referee. Had he not been holding up play i feel confident that we would've been more successful in that situation. I haven't re-watched the game, but IIRC the ref stepped away with like 2 seconds left on the play clock so Bradford had to hurry to snap the ball. It got me wondering, what would have happened if the ref stayed there for 2 more seconds, delay of game on the vikings?

Picked up PI flag sucked, but i guess we kind of got that back later in the game.

Our Defense, to me, was just as good as ever, they took the ball away 4 times and held the Eagles offense to 13 points. If our offense/ST played like they had in previouse weeks it would have been an Ugly game for the eagles.

Two huge negative plays by ST is very rare and "not sustainable"

Over all i feel good going forward if we can find a way to shore up the O-line.

_________________
Formerly AADPFan


Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:10 pm
Profile
Fenrir
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Posts: 10511
Location: Hawaii
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Grashopa wrote:
S197 wrote:
On the play where Long gave up the strip sack, he actually set up the edge pretty well, the DE had to make a very wide arc, which normally a QB can step up out of the way from. Unfortunately the interior also collapsed so there was nowhere to go. I tried to focus a bit on him and his first step still looks good, just unsure if the strength is still there.


I am not sure if i am thinking of the same play, but if its the one i was thinking of, Long had two guys to chose from and it seems he was unsure if he should block the DE or the DB. Like he didn't know who the RB was going to block so he was hesitant to block the DE and allow the free rusher inside. Could be one of those "gel" things.

I haven't had a chance to chime in yet, its a bit late, but why not now?

Correct me if i am wrong, but i believe that all Bradfords fumbles came as he as about to throw the ball, one more fraction of a second or one more inch and those balls would've been away and could've resulted in first downs or touchdowns. Football truly is a game of inches. I would be more concerned if he was getting sacked before he could find an open receiver. (I am concerned, the O-line was ugly, just looking for any bright spot).

The 3rd and short (and 4th and short) were doomed by the referee. Had he not been holding up play i feel confident that we would've been more successful in that situation. I haven't re-watched the game, but IIRC the ref stepped away with like 2 seconds left on the play clock so Bradford had to hurry to snap the ball. It got me wondering, what would have happened if the ref stayed there for 2 more seconds, delay of game on the vikings?

Picked up PI flag sucked, but i guess we kind of got that back later in the game.

Our Defense, to me, was just as good as ever, they took the ball away 4 times and held the Eagles offense to 13 points. If our offense/ST played like they had in previouse weeks it would have been an Ugly game for the eagles.

Two huge negative plays by ST is very rare and "not sustainable"

Over all i feel good going forward if we can find a way to shore up the O-line.


Wasn't that play but I think I know which one you're talking about. On the play you're mentioning, Rudolph did this weird little half chip on the blocker, I assume thinking Asiata would pick him up to help the tackle but Asiata initially goes to pick up the inside blitzer and is slow to bounce outside missing his block. May have been a TE screen, it was tough to tell but everything was poorly executed.


Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:16 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm
Posts: 2904
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Pondering Her Percy wrote:
VikingPaul73 wrote:
Wouldn't be surprised to see the Vikings lose next week.


Dude we're playing the bears who currently have Matt Barkley at QB. If we manage to lose that game, this franchise should fold



You were saying???


Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:30 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
Posts: 5606
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
So, is this going to be for this "game" against the Bears or should somebody start Crapfest Two: Soldier Field Boogaloo?


Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:48 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37200
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Hunter Morrow wrote:
So, is this going to be for this "game" against the Bears or should somebody start Crapfest Two: Soldier Field Boogaloo?



LOL! I think we can just consider the crapfest officially extended ...


Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:43 pm
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:20 pm
Posts: 978
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Mothman wrote:
Hunter Morrow wrote:
So, is this going to be for this "game" against the Bears or should somebody start Crapfest Two: Soldier Field Boogaloo?



LOL! I think we can just consider the crapfest officially extended ...


Yep....more crap different day.


Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:47 am
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
Posts: 1269
Post Re: Thoughts on the crapfest
Don't insult Crap......


Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:55 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: akvikingsfan, Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], me4get and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.