The same way our second game against the Bears went, and our first against the Lions, we obviously snapped out of our slump in the playoffs though, otherwise AZ would have owned us again.halfgiz wrote: That just speculation not fact. How did that 2nd game go against us?
Enemy Fan Forums: Green Bay Packers
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Enemy Fan Forums: Green Bay Packers
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Re: Enemy Fan Forums: Green Bay Packers
Jordysghost wrote: *Cough Packers had more turnovers. Cough*
According to NFL.com, they had 16 INTs and 6 recovered fumbles. That's a total of 22 turnovers.
The Vikings had 13 INTs and 9 recovered fumbles. 13+9 = 22.
In other words, you should get that cough looked at...
... or did I overlook something?
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Enemy Fan Forums: Green Bay Packers
No, your right. Jordy isn't very good at math.Mothman wrote:
According to NFL.com, they had 16 INTs and 6 recovered fumbles. That's a total of 22 turnovers.
The Vikings had 13 INTs and 9 recovered fumbles. 13+9 = 22.
In other words, you should get that cough looked at...
... or did I overlook something?
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Re: Enemy Fan Forums: Green Bay Packers
Jordysghost wrote:No, your right. Jordy isn't very good at math.