View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:07 pm



Reply to topic  [ 229 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
 State of the NFC North 
Author Message
Starter

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Posts: 191
Post State of the NFC North
Since we play in our division 6 times a year as well as frequently play a rival in the playoff it seems, it isn't a stretch to say that a lot of our success will hing, year to year on how well other NFC north teams prepare for the season. I thought it would be useful to have a thread devoted to what gaps the Lions, Packers, and Bears have and how our Vikings will stack up in response. Overall I feel like the Packers and the Bears haven't gotten any stronger as of yet through the off season. Feel free to add any insight and developments you spot that seem to bode well, or ill for the Vikings!

The Lions seem to have shored up a bit, especially by getting Reggie Bush. I remember almost watching him set the punt return record against the vikings a few years ago and I could see him being the difference in both games this year.

The Bears obviously have a big hole at middle linebacker now and I think their defense will be a lot less stout than in previous years, with a new coach and his tweaks to the system coupled with losing their "QB" on defense. Even if they end up with Ogletree I see AP having a couple of field days this year against them.

The packers still have the trouble on the offensive line and while losing GJ doesn't hurt them much at all, it certainly doesn't help them. I don't think the Vikings will be as good as the Packers this year but we are definitely closing the gap from just a couple of years ago.


Overall I think we are looking like a solid number two in the division but this is the first I can remember in a while that I wouldn't be surprised if everyone split.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:21 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
PurpleJarl wrote:
Since we play in our division 6 times a year as well as frequently play a rival in the playoff it seems, it isn't a stretch to say that a lot of our success will hing, year to year on how well other NFC north teams prepare for the season. I thought it would be useful to have a thread devoted to what gaps the Lions, Packers, and Bears have and how our Vikings will stack up in response. Overall I feel like the Packers and the Bears haven't gotten any stronger as of yet through the off season. Feel free to add any insight and developments you spot that seem to bode well, or ill for the Vikings!

The Lions seem to have shored up a bit, especially by getting Reggie Bush. I remember almost watching him set the punt return record against the vikings a few years ago and I could see him being the difference in both games this year.

The Bears obviously have a big whole at middle linebacker now and I think their defense will be a lot less stout than in previous years, with a new coach and his tweaks to the system coupled with losing their "QB" on defense. Even if they end up with Ogletree I see AP having a couple of field days this year against them.

The packers still have the trouble on the offensive line and while losing GJ doesn't hurt them much at all, it certainly doesn't help them. I don't think the Vikings will be as good as the Packers this year but we are definitely closing the gap from just a couple of years ago.


Overall I think we are looking like a solid number two in the division but this is the first I can remember in a while that I wouldn't be surprised if everyone split.


So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time? The Packers are in contention ever year and we NEVER sign to many free agents so, quite obviously, we are not going to 'gotten any better' until after the draft, our D is going to come together quite well next year, bank on it. :D Although I do feel the Vikings are getting better, and fast.

As for the Bears though, man, they really have had #### cap management for some years now, they are way too old to win in this league as it is.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:27 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Posts: 191
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
PurpleJarl wrote:
Since we play in our division 6 times a year as well as frequently play a rival in the playoff it seems, it isn't a stretch to say that a lot of our success will hing, year to year on how well other NFC north teams prepare for the season. I thought it would be useful to have a thread devoted to what gaps the Lions, Packers, and Bears have and how our Vikings will stack up in response. Overall I feel like the Packers and the Bears haven't gotten any stronger as of yet through the off season. Feel free to add any insight and developments you spot that seem to bode well, or ill for the Vikings!

The Lions seem to have shored up a bit, especially by getting Reggie Bush. I remember almost watching him set the punt return record against the vikings a few years ago and I could see him being the difference in both games this year.

The Bears obviously have a big whole at middle linebacker now and I think their defense will be a lot less stout than in previous years, with a new coach and his tweaks to the system coupled with losing their "QB" on defense. Even if they end up with Ogletree I see AP having a couple of field days this year against them.

The packers still have the trouble on the offensive line and while losing GJ doesn't hurt them much at all, it certainly doesn't help them. I don't think the Vikings will be as good as the Packers this year but we are definitely closing the gap from just a couple of years ago.


Overall I think we are looking like a solid number two in the division but this is the first I can remember in a while that I wouldn't be surprised if everyone split.


So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time? The Packers are in contention ever year and we NEVER sign to many free agents so, quite obviously, we are not going to 'gotten any better' until after the draft, our D is going to come together quite well next year, bank on it. :D

As for the Bears though, man, they really have had #### cap management for some years now, they are way too old to win in this league as it is.



Um, not at all. I don't even know what you are getting at actually lol. I mentioned reggie bush because he has a history of shredding the Vikings and greg jennings because he was an honest improvement name or no name. Then I proceeded to list the positions that haven't been filed as of yet by any FA of any quality by the Packers and the Bears. The Packers Oline is a perennially issue... so yeah, you kinda lost me there.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:30 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
PurpleJarl wrote:
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
PurpleJarl wrote:
Since we play in our division 6 times a year as well as frequently play a rival in the playoff it seems, it isn't a stretch to say that a lot of our success will hing, year to year on how well other NFC north teams prepare for the season. I thought it would be useful to have a thread devoted to what gaps the Lions, Packers, and Bears have and how our Vikings will stack up in response. Overall I feel like the Packers and the Bears haven't gotten any stronger as of yet through the off season. Feel free to add any insight and developments you spot that seem to bode well, or ill for the Vikings!

The Lions seem to have shored up a bit, especially by getting Reggie Bush. I remember almost watching him set the punt return record against the vikings a few years ago and I could see him being the difference in both games this year.

The Bears obviously have a big whole at middle linebacker now and I think their defense will be a lot less stout than in previous years, with a new coach and his tweaks to the system coupled with losing their "QB" on defense. Even if they end up with Ogletree I see AP having a couple of field days this year against them.

The packers still have the trouble on the offensive line and while losing GJ doesn't hurt them much at all, it certainly doesn't help them. I don't think the Vikings will be as good as the Packers this year but we are definitely closing the gap from just a couple of years ago.


Overall I think we are looking like a solid number two in the division but this is the first I can remember in a while that I wouldn't be surprised if everyone split.


So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time? The Packers are in contention ever year and we NEVER sign to many free agents so, quite obviously, we are not going to 'gotten any better' until after the draft, our D is going to come together quite well next year, bank on it. :D

As for the Bears though, man, they really have had #### cap management for some years now, they are way too old to win in this league as it is.



Um, not at all. I don't even know what you are getting at actually lol. I mentioned reggie bush because he has a history of shredding the Vikings and greg jennings because he was an honest improvement name or no name. Then I proceeded to list the positions that haven't been filed as of yet by any FA of any quality by the Packers and the Bears. The Packers Oline is a perennially issue... so yeah, you kinda lost me there.


I certainly apologize if I mis understood you a bit, but perhaps I should have worded my point a little bit better.

All I meant to say was that while you say, "The packers haven't got any better." and all I mean to say is, it isnt very typical for them to have improved this early in the season,so saying they haven't improved doesn't really mean anything because it's simply not their way.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:36 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Posts: 2629
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
PurpleJarl wrote:
Since we play in our division 6 times a year as well as frequently play a rival in the playoff it seems, it isn't a stretch to say that a lot of our success will hing, year to year on how well other NFC north teams prepare for the season. I thought it would be useful to have a thread devoted to what gaps the Lions, Packers, and Bears have and how our Vikings will stack up in response. Overall I feel like the Packers and the Bears haven't gotten any stronger as of yet through the off season. Feel free to add any insight and developments you spot that seem to bode well, or ill for the Vikings!

The Lions seem to have shored up a bit, especially by getting Reggie Bush. I remember almost watching him set the punt return record against the vikings a few years ago and I could see him being the difference in both games this year.

The Bears obviously have a big whole at middle linebacker now and I think their defense will be a lot less stout than in previous years, with a new coach and his tweaks to the system coupled with losing their "QB" on defense. Even if they end up with Ogletree I see AP having a couple of field days this year against them.

The packers still have the trouble on the offensive line and while losing GJ doesn't hurt them much at all, it certainly doesn't help them. I don't think the Vikings will be as good as the Packers this year but we are definitely closing the gap from just a couple of years ago.


Overall I think we are looking like a solid number two in the division but this is the first I can remember in a while that I wouldn't be surprised if everyone split.


So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time? The Packers are in contention ever year and we NEVER sign to many free agents so, quite obviously, we are not going to 'gotten any better' until after the draft, our D is going to come together quite well next year, bank on it. :D

As for the Bears though, man, they really have had #### cap management for some years now, they are way too old to win in this league as it is.


As far as not signing any/many "big name " players, what about Reggie White, Charles Woodson, Jeff Saturday, just off of the top of my head :? And now how about your team's record over the last two years going from 15-1 to 11-5 just barely edging the Vikings out of the Title picture? You lost Jennings, Woodson and your Pro Bowl center (Friday). Your o-line is average at best and your defense is a joke. So I am not quite agreeing with your assesment. :confused:

_________________
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:37 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Posts: 191
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Absolutely teams will still improve before the start of the season and yes I am well aware the your GM love to build through the draft. My point was simply, as of right now I think the Vikings have gained a little ground on the Packers we shall see if that still seems to be after the draft :wink: but I have faith in Spielmen. To be honest I am jealous of the Packers set up and am glad we finally have a Front office that seems to emulate the build. However, its not so much the defense of the Packers that I look at but the issues on the Oline. Your D is going to be back seated to your offense as usual imo.


And yeah, the bears are in trouble for the foreseeable future with the cap issues. As well as the age. I kinda think that the Ravens did what they did this off season to avoid becoming like the bears.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:42 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Posts: 191
Post Re: State of the NFC North
But to keep it on target and to sum up, Bears D is going to be weaker than its been in years imo and the Packers need to focus on everything BUT offense this year in the draft and we MIGHT see a hiccup in their offense, one can hope. AP should shred the Bears.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:48 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Purple bruise wrote:
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
PurpleJarl wrote:
Since we play in our division 6 times a year as well as frequently play a rival in the playoff it seems, it isn't a stretch to say that a lot of our success will hing, year to year on how well other NFC north teams prepare for the season. I thought it would be useful to have a thread devoted to what gaps the Lions, Packers, and Bears have and how our Vikings will stack up in response. Overall I feel like the Packers and the Bears haven't gotten any stronger as of yet through the off season. Feel free to add any insight and developments you spot that seem to bode well, or ill for the Vikings!

The Lions seem to have shored up a bit, especially by getting Reggie Bush. I remember almost watching him set the punt return record against the vikings a few years ago and I could see him being the difference in both games this year.

The Bears obviously have a big whole at middle linebacker now and I think their defense will be a lot less stout than in previous years, with a new coach and his tweaks to the system coupled with losing their "QB" on defense. Even if they end up with Ogletree I see AP having a couple of field days this year against them.

The packers still have the trouble on the offensive line and while losing GJ doesn't hurt them much at all, it certainly doesn't help them. I don't think the Vikings will be as good as the Packers this year but we are definitely closing the gap from just a couple of years ago.


Overall I think we are looking like a solid number two in the division but this is the first I can remember in a while that I wouldn't be surprised if everyone split.


So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time? The Packers are in contention ever year and we NEVER sign to many free agents so, quite obviously, we are not going to 'gotten any better' until after the draft, our D is going to come together quite well next year, bank on it. :D

As for the Bears though, man, they really have had #### cap management for some years now, they are way too old to win in this league as it is.


As far as not signing any/many "big name " players, what about Reggie White, Charles Woodson, Jeff Saturday, just off of the top of my head :? And now how about your team's record over the last two years going from 15-1 to 11-5 just barely edging the Vikings out of the Title picture? You lost Jennings, Woodson and your Pro Bowl center (Friday). Your o-line is average at best and your defense is a joke. So I am not quite agreeing with your assesment. :confused:


Our 11th ranked scoring defense is joke? Yea, ok buddy.
, Reggie White was a rare occurance because teams were just learning how free agency worked. Charles was instrumental in our success, but if you remember nobody else wanted him, and he didn't want the Packers to begin with anyways, and Jeff Saturday? The dude that got supplanted in the middle of the season? And are you really ripping on the Packers for being 11-5? That's I pretty good record in my opinion, once your in the playoff anything fan happen.


Last edited by RandallioCobb18 on Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:02 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Posts: 2629
Post Re: State of the NFC North
No clue huh :?: 11-5 is an ok record but how about going from one loss to 5 times as many losses in one year? Or the Vikings having improved their record from 3-13 to 10-6 and the play-offs (which is more impressive) :)
The Pack will be lucky to make the play-offs this year 8)

_________________
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS


Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:16 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Purple bruise wrote:
No clue huh :?: 11-5 is an ok record but how about going from one loss to 5 times as many losses in one year? Or the Vikings having improved their record from 3-13 to 10-6 and the play-offs (which is more impressive) :)
The Pack will be lucky to make the play-offs this year 8)


Well, I probably shouldn't have went to that, I read your initial post as a bit more spiteful then I think it was, ha dont know why I was that touchy so for that, my bad.

But, lucky to get in the playoffs?? HAHA ok bruh, you guys made it because AD had an amazing year, you think he's going to be able to do that again? Don't count on it, and also your always going to be at sever disadvantage with Ponder unless he gets ALOT better in the next couple years, if he's in Minny that long. At best that dude is a game manager. As long as we have Aaron, were probably going to be a playoff team, look at manning and the Colts/Broncos. If any one is going to be fighting for a wildcard its probably going to be the Vikings/Bears, maybe lions but idk about that. The Vikes are free to try and prove me wrong though.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:27 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Posts: 2629
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
Purple bruise wrote:
No clue huh :?: 11-5 is an ok record but how about going from one loss to 5 times as many losses in one year? Or the Vikings having improved their record from 3-13 to 10-6 and the play-offs (which is more impressive) :)
The Pack will be lucky to make the play-offs this year 8)


Well, I probably shouldn't have went to that, I read your initial post as a bit more spiteful then I think it was, ha dont know why I was that touchy so for that, my bad.

But, lucky to get in the playoffs?? HAHA ok bruh, you guys made it because AD had an amazing year, you think he's going to be able to do that again? Don't count on it, and also your always going to be at sever disadvantage with Ponder unless he gets ALOT better in the next couple years, if he's in Minny that long. At best that dude is a game manager. As long as we have Aaron, were probably going to be a playoff team, look at manning and the Colts/Broncos. If any one is going to be fighting for a wildcard its probably going to be the Vikings/Bears, maybe lions but idk about that. The Vikes are free to try and prove me wrong though.

You are spot on about "if" the Vikings lose AD but take it a step further...if the Pack lost AR they would struggle to beat anybody.

_________________
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS


Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:34 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Purple bruise wrote:
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
Purple bruise wrote:
No clue huh :?: 11-5 is an ok record but how about going from one loss to 5 times as many losses in one year? Or the Vikings having improved their record from 3-13 to 10-6 and the play-offs (which is more impressive) :)
The Pack will be lucky to make the play-offs this year 8)


Well, I probably shouldn't have went to that, I read your initial post as a bit more spiteful then I think it was, ha dont know why I was that touchy so for that, my bad.

But, lucky to get in the playoffs?? HAHA ok bruh, you guys made it because AD had an amazing year, you think he's going to be able to do that again? Don't count on it, and also your always going to be at sever disadvantage with Ponder unless he gets ALOT better in the next couple years, if he's in Minny that long. At best that dude is a game manager. As long as we have Aaron, were probably going to be a playoff team, look at manning and the Colts/Broncos. If any one is going to be fighting for a wildcard its probably going to be the Vikings/Bears, maybe lions but idk about that. The Vikes are free to try and prove me wrong though.

You are spot on about "if" the Vikings lose AD but take it a step further...if the Pack lost AR they would struggle to beat anybody.


Your right but you could say the same about almost every team with a franchise QB, how good would the Saints be without Brees? Or Denver with Manning, they'd all be screwed. Both the Pack and the Vikes have players they completely depend on, but so does every one else in the league, almost everyone at least.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:47 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 1245
Location: Seattle, Wa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Each of the teams in the North possess something that make them dangerous or a possible contender.

The Bears overall seem to be on the decline, but I'll never underestimate how well they look offensively when Cutler is on his game. Him and Marshall are a pain.

Lions are as explosive as anyone and their defense has some potential their too. Any given sunday, right? Especially given their last place schedule. Wouldn't at all be surprised if they made a run to the playoffs again this year.

Packers: Aaron Rodgers. Nuff said.

Vikings: So long as we're looking at this objectively I'll just leave it with two letters...AP. I like where this team is headed (and obviously the draft is huge for the direction of this teams future) and there's still a ? mark next to Ponder, but so long as AP his in a Vikings uniform, then you have to like their chances to stay close and win a game.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:57 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:

Your right but you could say the same about almost every team with a franchise QB, how good would the Saints be without Brees? Or Denver with Manning, they'd all be screwed. Both the Pack and the Vikes have players they completely depend on, but so does every one else in the league, almost everyone at least.


If Denver was good with Tebow...I think they could still be alright without Manning. This is Denver we are talking about--not the Colts. :)


Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:59 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
MelanieMFunk wrote:
RandallioCobb18 wrote:

Your right but you could say the same about almost every team with a franchise QB, how good would the Saints be without Brees? Or Denver with Manning, they'd all be screwed. Both the Pack and the Vikes have players they completely depend on, but so does every one else in the league, almost everyone at least.


If Denver was good with Tebow...I think they could still be alright without Manning. This is Denver we are talking about--not the Colts. :)


Ha, oh man, I hate Tebow.

I like Peyton with the Broncos, how cool would An Aaron Rodgers vs Peyton Manning SB be?! :rock: :rock:

I have a feeling you guys may not agree...


Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:07 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:43 am
Posts: 2246
Location: Minneapolis
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Make for a more interesting match up than Big Ben vs Rodgers. GB needs to get over that SF and NYG hump. GB is an incredibly soft team with a horrific defense. Does Dom Capers' haircut make him not make in game adjustments? :P

Packers, much like the Patriots, are going to be playoff contenders as long as they got their big money QB. Patriots without Brady? Yikes. Packers without Rodgers? My word...Harrell?

_________________
Pull yr 84 jerseys out.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:17 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:

Ha, oh man, I hate Tebow.

I like Peyton with the Broncos, how cool would An Aaron Rodgers vs Peyton Manning SB be?! :rock: :rock:

I have a feeling you guys may not agree...


Very cool, as long as the Broncos win--more importantly (because it sounds better) that the Packers lose. :thumbsup:


Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:23 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm
Posts: 5465
Location: University of Iowa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
It is Green Bay's division to lose. Minnesota has a good shot at being the 2nd team in the North again, but I don't see us winning the division. I am not on board the annual Chicago hype train either. Chicago will crash and burn like usual due to another poor draft.

_________________
A Randy Moss fan for life. Skol Randy.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:46 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 29038
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: State of the NFC North
I think the division is completely up for grabs. I see GB as the favorite and Detroit as the least likely to succeed but I think any of the 4 teams in have the talent to win it if things come together for them and they stay healthy.

The draft could be a key for all 4 teams because they all have holes and areas that really need to be addressed. GB needs to improve their defense and running game. I don't follow the Lions as closely as the other teams but it seems to me that they need to do likewise, particular the back end of their defense. Reggie Bush should help their offense get even more explosive. That's a team with talent but insufficient discipline.

The Bears improved at left tackle and TE, probably took a step back at LB and have a new coaching staff. Overall, it's tough to tell if they're on the upswing or the downswing but they're clearly in transition. If they have a good draft and improve their o-line enough, they could be formidable on offense. The new coaching staff is a big X factor.

The Vikes? They have a tough schedule and a zillion question marks so I have no idea if they'll take a step forward, win 11+ games and advance in the playoffs or if they'll take a step back. They had a remarkable 7 win improvement last year and that could prove a tough act to follow. They need a great draft and some good fortune to keep advancing.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:03 pm
Profile WWW
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
NextQuestion wrote:
Make for a more interesting match up than Big Ben vs Rodgers. GB needs to get over that SF and NYG hump. GB is an incredibly soft team with a horrific defense. Does Dom Capers' haircut make him not make in game adjustments? :P

Packers, much like the Patriots, are going to be playoff contenders as long as they got their big money QB. Patriots without Brady? Yikes. Packers without Rodgers? My word...Harrell?


If we're so soft, then what does that make you? Not soft? We've beat you guys 6 out of the last 7 games, we also beat a pretty damn hard hitting, tough, Steelers team in the Super Bowl. Granted, that was in 2010 but I think it shows we are entirely capable of besting ANYBODY in the league when we are on our game, not that it always works out like that, we defiantly need to get tougher up front but that's what the draft is for .

Capers is decent, albeit a bit stubborn, 2009-2010 we had a top defense, 2011 was our only real bad year, as last year we were 11th ranked scoring d in the league. We had no answer for Kapernick and the read option, I expect that to change.
You should probably focus getting over the hump against us, before worrying about who we see in the playoffs.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:34 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:35 pm
Posts: 1878
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:

So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time?


Jared Allen.

_________________
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.

-- Bud Grant


Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:47 pm
Profile
Starter

Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:07 pm
Posts: 164
Post Re: State of the NFC North
headless_norseman wrote:
RandallioCobb18 wrote:

So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time?


Jared Allen.


I never said free agent pick ups never worked out, I was saying that the teams that frequently pay for free agents rather then build there team through the draft dont win Championships, period.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:59 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm
Posts: 7946
Post Re: State of the NFC North
headless_norseman wrote:
RandallioCobb18 wrote:

So in your mind, signing big names is the way to win in the NFL? Hasn't that been proven to be wrong time after time?


Jared Allen.


Jared Allen w/Minnesota Vikings:

Code:
2008  10-6  NFC North 1st  0-1 playoffs
2009  12-4  NFC North 1st  1-1 playoffs
2010  6-10  NFC North 4th  -
2011  3-13  NFC North 4th  -
2012  10-6  NFC North 2nd  0-1 playoffs

Total W/L: 42-42

Interesting.


Sat Apr 20, 2013 9:42 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:35 pm
Posts: 1878
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post Re: State of the NFC North
It's a very interesting discussion all by itself, and I may have misread him, but that's why I popped of with Jared's name. He has been a warrior for the Vikes. And we are going to need him more than ever this season.

_________________
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.

-- Bud Grant


Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:15 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 7735
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Jared Allen was NOT a free agent signing.


Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:25 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 29038
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: State of the NFC North
RandallioCobb18 wrote:
NextQuestion wrote:
Make for a more interesting match up than Big Ben vs Rodgers. GB needs to get over that SF and NYG hump. GB is an incredibly soft team with a horrific defense. Does Dom Capers' haircut make him not make in game adjustments? :P

Packers, much like the Patriots, are going to be playoff contenders as long as they got their big money QB. Patriots without Brady? Yikes. Packers without Rodgers? My word...Harrell?


If we're so soft, then what does that make you? Not soft? We've beat you guys 6 out of the last 7 games, we also beat a pretty damn hard hitting, tough, Steelers team in the Super Bowl. Granted, that was in 2010 but I think it shows we are entirely capable of besting ANYBODY in the league when we are on our game, not that it always works out like that, we defiantly need to get tougher up front but that's what the draft is for .

Capers is decent, albeit a bit stubborn, 2009-2010 we had a top defense, 2011 was our only real bad year, as last year we were 11th ranked scoring d in the league. We had no answer for Kapernick and the read option, I expect that to change.


GB had no answer for the Cardinals offense in the 2009 postseason either and no answer for the Giants offense in the 2011 playoffs. In their last 3 postseason losses, the Packers have allowed an average of about 44 points per game. Their defense came through for them in 2010 and they won it all but it's clear they have a problem.

Quote:
You should probably focus getting over the hump against us, before worrying about who we see in the playoffs.


I doubt anybody here is worried about who the Packers play in the postseason... unless it's the Vikings. :)


Last edited by Mothman on Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:14 am, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:19 am
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Quote:
GB had no answer for the Cardinals offense in the 2009 postseason either and no answer for the Giants offense in the 2011 playoffs. In their last 3 postseason losses, the Packers have allowed an average of about 44 points per game. Their defense came through for them in 2009 and they won it all but it's clear they have a problen.


Read that again and tell me what's wrong with it. ;)

Anyways, you're right. No one cares much about the Packers. Isn't this a Vikings fan message board? Do Vikings fans go on other boards? Weird. :) We have enough doubters within our own fanbase. They serve as good opposing fans in a way. lol.

We just have to take care of our own. Not worried about anything or anyone else.


Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:26 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 29038
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: State of the NFC North
MelanieMFunk wrote:
Quote:
GB had no answer for the Cardinals offense in the 2009 postseason either and no answer for the Giants offense in the 2011 playoffs. In their last 3 postseason losses, the Packers have allowed an average of about 44 points per game. Their defense came through for them in 2009 and they won it all but it's clear they have a problen.


Read that again and tell me what's wrong with it. ;)


Oops!

LOL! Thanks for catching that, Melanie. I really shouldn't attempt tasks as complex as thinking and typing first thing in the morning. ;)


Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:16 am
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
Mothman wrote:
MelanieMFunk wrote:
Quote:
GB had no answer for the Cardinals offense in the 2009 postseason either and no answer for the Giants offense in the 2011 playoffs. In their last 3 postseason losses, the Packers have allowed an average of about 44 points per game. Their defense came through for them in 2009 and they won it all but it's clear they have a problen.


Read that again and tell me what's wrong with it. ;)


Oops!

LOL! Thanks for catching that, Melanie. I really shouldn't attempt tasks as complex as thinking and typing first thing in the morning. ;)


Ha. Here in an hour I'll be up for 24 hours. (I work overnights). I'm surprised I'm even functioning let alone catching mistakes. :) You gotta be on your game vs. Packers fans. Come on now!


Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:20 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Posts: 3632
Location: Northeast, Iowa
Post Re: State of the NFC North
We better watch out for the Bears. T.O. wants to play for them. lol.

Quote:
"I played my first early years in San Francisco with [Bears head coach Marc Trestman] and shortly after that, he left to do some things," Owens said. "I haven't talked to Marc in a long while. I know he's gone on and done some things, now he's back in the NFL. So, I never really thought about it until myself and Napoleon [Harris] :twisted: were talking about it earlier, but I would definitely welcome it if they would give it some serious consideration. To think about [Bears wide receiver Brandon Marshall] on the other side and me on one side, that's really dangerous. I'm keeping myself in shape just for any opportunity that may come about."


I like Owens, but he just needs to let. it. go.


Sun Apr 21, 2013 10:02 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 229 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Demi, Google [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.