Vikings 'D' Seeking Answers

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL
x 67

Re: Vikings 'D' Seeking Answers

Post by Raptorman »

It will be interesting to see if Audie Cole gets any playing time this weekend. I read that he should be on the active roster for this game.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings 'D' Seeking Answers

Post by Mothman »

S197 wrote: I'm sorry but this is a load of crap. Maybe if we were talking about Brandon Marshall or Calvin Johnson, or heck even Justin Blackmon. Our defense was beat in those critical situations by guys like Cecil Shorts and Donnie Avery, 5'11 - 6'0 200lb receivers.
They were beat by Reggie Wayne too and I think it's legit to consider him a matchup problem. Avery's not a physical matchup problem in terms of size but he is very fast and that can pose problems too. It probably also depends on who is matched up on who...

Execution is probably the bigger problem.
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 12790
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 662

Re: Vikings 'D' Seeking Answers

Post by S197 »

Mothman wrote: They were beat by Reggie Wayne too and I think it's legit to consider him a matchup problem. Avery's not a physical matchup problem in terms of size but he is very fast and that can pose problems too. It probably also depends on who is matched up on who...

Execution is probably the bigger problem.
I definitely wouldn't take anything away from Wayne, he's been one of the best for a long long time. I just don't see guys like Shorts and Avery as physically dominant. I'm not saying these types of receivers cannot be successful, obviously we need to look no further than Percy Harvin (or Steve Smith, Welker, etc.), but to me the author comes off as if our corners are getting bullied around by bigger Calvin Johnsonesque receivers and there's not much coaching or scheming that can be done to remedy the problem.

As I mentioned and you seem to agree, it's more about execution, not being physically overmatched.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings 'D' Seeking Answers

Post by Mothman »

S197 wrote:I definitely wouldn't take anything away from Wayne, he's been one of the best for a long long time. I just don't see guys like Shorts and Avery as physically dominant. I'm not saying these types of receivers cannot be successful, obviously we need to look no further than Percy Harvin (or Steve Smith, Welker, etc.), but to me the author comes off as if our corners are getting bullied around by bigger Calvin Johnsonesque receivers and there's not much coaching or scheming that can be done to remedy the problem.
It sounds like we simply interpreted the comment differently. I took "physically overmatched" to mean they were losing certain battles for physical reasons rather than mental reasons, which could mean they were out-matched by speed, size, agility... basically any physical quality (or combination of qualities). As you said, smaller receivers like Harvin and Welker can be successful and Harvin is definitely an example of a receiver who doesn't have the size to bully defenders but is a mismatch for many of them.
As I mentioned and you seem to agree, it's more about execution, not being physically overmatched.
We definitely agree on that but I do think quickness and speed can create mismatches just like the size, weight and leaping ability of someone like Calvin johnson. After all, if a defender can't keep up with a receiver, he's in just as much trouble as he would be if he was giving up 5 or 6 inches and 15-20 lbs to a receiver.
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8230
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 933

Re: Vikings 'D' Seeking Answers

Post by VikingLord »

I also still don't understand why the Vikings were in zone late against the Colts. You are playing a rookie QB. Luck is probably not your average rookie QB, but he's still a rookie, and rookie QB's tend to make mistakes in pressure situations. They take bad sacks, for example, as Luck did.

If there was ever a situation for playing more man and press coverage to throw off routes and timing, late against the Colts was it. And yet there the Vikings were at the end in their soft zone and Luck picked it apart like he's been in the league 10 years.

As I said in another post, a failure of imagination on the part of the coaches, and a failure to understand situational football. You know they need yards, and you know they need them in a hurry and a lot of them. You lock up on their receivers, try to get a solid jam, and provide safety support over the top. You certainly don't find yourself in a situation where the ball is completed to a wide open receiver past 20 yards where there isn't a single defender in the picture, even if the QB did manage to buy time by rolling away from pressure.

I think Cook was the defender nearest the Colt receiver on that first completion on the Colts' last drive. He was also the guy covering the Jags receiver late when the Jags scored the go-ahead TD. Cook may be big and fast, but he stinks as a cover corner. Zero ball instincts from what I can see. Maybe if he can face the QB he's better, but then put him at safety where he has a chance to do that. Corners have to have better instincts than Cook appears to have, and no amount of coaching is going to fix that.
Post Reply