Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4672
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Texas Vike »

It's looking more and more likely that the Vikings will get to play a less than full strength Jaguar team on Sept. 9th. MJD is holding out and things are only getting worse between him, his agent and the GM. With the way our run D has played this may be a real blessing!

We'll take any advantage we can get.
User avatar
9man
Transition Player
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:23 pm
x 11

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by 9man »

I remember a play a few years MJD lit up Merriman but MJD's backup isn't all that bad. Vikes win this game either way.
NextQuestion
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2249
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by NextQuestion »

This game worries me as people tend to think this is a guaranteed win. I get the feeling that we're going to struggle covering Blackmon and Robinson. Lewis isn't a bad TE either. I see it being close but I think we can MAYBE sneak a messy win out of this. If MJD is in... I think we're in trouble big time.
Pull yr 84 jerseys out.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Mothman »

NextQuestion wrote:This game worries me as people tend to think this is a guaranteed win. I get the feeling that we're going to struggle covering Blackmon and Robinson. Lewis isn't a bad TE either. I see it being close but I think we can MAYBE sneak a messy win out of this. If MJD is in... I think we're in trouble big time.
I don't think they'd be in big trouble but he would certainly make the game more difficult for the Vikes. On the other hand, I don't consider this an easy win either. The Vikes were 3-13 last year. NO game should be considered an easy win until they prove they can dominate opponents again. Jacksonville had a stout defense last year so I doubt they'll be a pushover, with or without MJD.

I think it will be a great game between two highly motivated teams. Both teams will be eager to set a bad 2011 season behind them by starting the 2012 season off right.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Eli »

Not a guaranteed win by any stretch, but very much a "should" win. Jacksonville is one of the poorer teams in the NFL and the Vikings are playing at home. If the Vikings don't win this game, even if they're without both Simpson and Peterson, it could be a very bad indicator of the season to come. On the other hand, if they can win convincingly, they'll be taking some much needed confidence into Indianapolis the following week. So, it's kind of a big deal.
vikeinmontana
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3168
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:23 pm
x 139

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by vikeinmontana »

from a fan perspective, and this board in particular, this game is a lose-lose. we win and who cares, we should beat a team like the jags. they're terrible. this win means nothing because we SHOULD beat the jags at home. and if we lose.....well...i don't think i need to bother suggesting the tone of this board. :lol:
i'm ready for a beer.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Mothman »

Eli wrote:Not a guaranteed win by any stretch, but very much a "should" win. Jacksonville is one of the poorer teams in the NFL and the Vikings are playing at home. If the Vikings don't win this game, even if they're without both Simpson and Peterson, it could be a very bad indicator of the season to come. On the other hand, if they can win convincingly, they'll be taking some much needed confidence into Indianapolis the following week. So, it's kind of a big deal.
It's definitely a big deal. It could set the tone for the season.
vikeinmontana wrote:from a fan perspective, and this board in particular, this game is a lose-lose. we win and who cares, we should beat a team like the jags. they're terrible. this win means nothing because we SHOULD beat the jags at home. and if we lose.....well...i don't think i need to bother suggesting the tone of this board. :lol:
It won't be a universal tone. You just have to look for the measured and reasonable posts and ignore the over-the-top stuff. :)

I'm definitely not taking a casual, "who cares" view of the game. I think an opening day win would be big for the Vikes.
HardcoreVikesFan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6652
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm
x 21

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by HardcoreVikesFan »

I don't know if you can classify anything as a sure thing in the NFL. That being said, I think we could be considered favorites to win the game. Should we lose, I honestly do not think I will care too much. Losing sucks yes, but hell, I have learned to become numb to losing so I can easily move on if Minnesota loses. I just love watching my team play regardless of the outcome.
A Randy Moss fan for life. A Kevin Williams fan for life.
Just Me
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6101
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Just Me »

Mothman wrote:The Vikes were 3-13 last year. NO game should be considered an easy win until they prove they can dominate opponents again.
This ^^^^
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Demi »

We're playing a team as bad as we are. Seems like a coin flip game...
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by jackal »

that will be good for Jarad Allen he should be able to go nuts on the youngster QB with Drew to worry about
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4672
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Texas Vike »

jackal wrote:that will be good for Jarad Allen he should be able to go nuts on the youngster QB with Drew to worry about

Good point.

Just saw that AD's not likely to play in this game either. That hurts, but I think Toby can carry the load.

This game matters a lot, for momentum purposes alone and to get guys on the team believing. Confidence is crucial and contagious.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Demi »

Just saw that AD's not likely to play in this game either.
Their defense should be able to go nuts on our youngster QB without AD to worry about. :lol:
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Mothman »

Demi wrote: Their defense should be able to go nuts on our youngster QB without AD to worry about. :lol:
Why is that funny?
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Opener vs. Jacksonville (sans Maurice Jones-Drew)

Post by Mothman »

Texas Vike wrote:Just saw that AD's not likely to play in this game either. That hurts, but I think Toby can carry the load.

I think so too but where did you see that about AD? I know Sid Hartman is speculating that he won't play in the opener but is there some info beyond that?

I'm guessing even if Peterson plays, he'll be used sparingly and strategically and Gerhart will be asked handle the majority of the workload.
Post Reply