Which would be better?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: Which would be better?

Post by The Breeze » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:33 pm

absolutely no way, barring a string of injuries, this team goes 3-13.

User avatar
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6908
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm

Re: Which would be better?

Post by J. Kapp 11 » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:44 pm

Demi wrote:Overall my point was 8-8 showing improvement would have meant the Colts never get a ring. And don't get a top 10 all time quarterback for over a decade. Going 3-13 means we got a franchise left tackle. 2-14 and we'd be in even a better position to rebuild. There are times when that top draft pick has clearly made a significant difference to a franchise. And the only reason they had the opportunity was because of that 3-13 record.
Tell that to New England. They draft in the bottom 5 every year, yet they've managed to build a sustainable powerhouse.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.

Post Reply