GBFavreFan wrote:I guess this is a silver lining. And the entirety of the game made me forget the efficiency of those first few drives. But maybe those drives is what frustrates me. They marched on down, called $hiddy plays and failed to close the deal.
The other side of the coin is that the Vikings offense is driving, producing positive yards and getting points. The downside is that, with our (lack of?) defense, they are settling for field goals when they absolutely need touchdowns. The stats don't lie. The Vikings aren't tops in the NFL in yards, but they also aren't at the bottom. They currently rank 17th, about where they were thought to be at the beginning of the season (especially without Simpson). Was there anybody thinking this offense was going to have a realistic chance of being in the top-10?
As soon as the Colts figured things out (which didn't take long) the Vikings offense failed to adjust until the desperation plays against the prevent defense and ultimately the individual heroics of Percy Harvin.
The Vikings have had a decent amount of sustained drives this season already. They aren't lighting it up (especially not in the first half) but they aren't getting blown away in time of possession (currently 20th) and going three-and-out routinely.
I just know if the Vikings organization thinks we can play every game like that one and consider that a "close game" and be pleased with Ponder's performance because his on-paper stats are good, then we're never going to win another game this season.
I don't think the alternative is realistic; the alternative being the VIkings come out of the gate firing on all cylinders and conjuring up spirits of '99. This isn't New England, Green Bay or New Orleans, as desperately as many of us wish they were. IMO the best chance they have at winning games is to control the ToP, limit turnovers, put up points and (God willing) win the turnover battle. They simply aren't built on either side of the ball to blow teams out. And expecting this remarkably young defense (especially on the back end) to field a top-10 unit after an abysmal year with no substantial free agent signings and a couple of rookies is setting yourself up for disappointment, anger and alcoholism. If the Vikings are going to win games this season, accept the fact that they are probably aren't going to be more than by 7 points.
Did anyone see Frazier's postgame press conference? Did he act like it was an evenly fought contest or was there urgency that they have a lot of improvement to make?
What did you realistically expect him to say?
"Ohmygod! We suck! We have to do something quick or else we're all doomed! Doomed I tell you!"
Any variation of this isn't in his nature (or the nature of more than 80% of NFL head coaches that have ever taken the field...IMO). Watch other losing head coaches' press conferences and you won't find them panicing or acting like there's any urgency. That
never something you want your leader/head coach to exhibit. You express confidence in your team, spout cliches, mention how you'll have to "clean some things up for next week" and move on.
If Frazier is disappointed or going to chew anyone out, he's going to do it and address the issue privately.