Then I do so, sir, question your "objectivitiy" (sic) or "objectivity" as I obviously meant it to be typed.psjordan wrote: Well, realistically it is NOT indicative of improvement in my world either, so go ahead and question my "objectivitiy" as well.
I believe part (most?) of what Demi is hinting at is something I also agree with - less than one game is a ridiculous sample size to draw any conclusions.
Best case you walk away from that game feeling positive about Ponder or maybe nonplussed. But no way is one half of one game indicative of anything.
Ponder could still end up with the lowest (or highest) QB rating this year. Judge his improvement over last year after 7,8, 9 games or so this season.
The humorous part of the above is that nearly everyone is expressing just what you did (majority feel positive about the Game or cautiously reminding others that it is one game (please re-read my earlier posts in this thread)) but the only ones who seems convinced that there is a definitive conclusion here are the ones who seem to suggest Ponder is not up to the task of being our long-term solution at quarterback. I am trying to convey that he had a Good Game, and yes, I feel it is indicative of his improvement and progression. I think I have been clear in my previous posts on this...