View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:55 am



Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 How many wins this year 
Author Message
Pro Bowl Elite Player

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am
Posts: 985
Post Re: How many wins this year
You people crack me up. Each time I come here and read something, I get dumber. Regardless of what you may think, we had a very strong draft. Only time will tell, but I think we will win somewhere between 6 and 8 games this year, which is a good improvement. What clown predicted 3 wins? We do play in a tough division, but with each year Aaron Rodgers is getting older, and our QB position is younger. Perhaps in contrast, I think the best from Ponder is yet to come. You can't shine on a dog sh_t team, no matter how hard you try. He had no offensive line, no receivers, so what do you expect? Last season was the worst I've ever seen as a Vikings fan, and I'm not really all that old. We are a much better team now.


Fri May 04, 2012 1:48 am
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm
Posts: 7946
Post Re: How many wins this year
mosscarter wrote:
We do play in a tough division, but with each year Aaron Rodgers is getting older, and our QB position is younger.


You've gotta be kidding. Aaron Rodgers is 28 years old.


Quote:
Perhaps in contrast, I think the best from Ponder is yet to come.


You think? Nah.... his career peaked around the time he started his 3rd game.


Fri May 04, 2012 2:15 am
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
Posts: 7235
Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
Post Re: How many wins this year
most likely about 4-12 is a reasonable expectation. anything better would be a pleasant and hoped for suprise. Another FA and Draft season is needed


Fri May 04, 2012 6:12 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
Eli wrote:
mosscarter wrote:
We do play in a tough division, but with each year Aaron Rodgers is getting older, and our QB position is younger.


You've gotta be kidding. Aaron Rodgers is 28 years old.



But he IS getting older... :rofl:


Fri May 04, 2012 6:19 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Posts: 3072
Location: Sebastian, FL
Post Re: How many wins this year
10-6 to 12-4. Yeah, optimistic as all get out.

_________________
It's not how many times you get knocked down that matters, it's how many times you get back up and try again.


Fri May 04, 2012 11:01 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:54 pm
Posts: 1350
Location: Dull-youth, Minn-E-so-taw
Post Re: How many wins this year
How many games did we lose by one play last season? All but Saints, Bears (road) and Pack (road)... I'll say 13-3 :rock:

_________________
Seek and Destroy


Sat May 05, 2012 3:10 am
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:52 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Charleston, SC
Post Re: How many wins this year
I will consider it a successful season if we go 8-8

_________________
Fan of:
Hanahan Hawks
South Carolina Gamecocks
Minnesota Vikings
Charleston Battery
FC Bayern München
USMNT & Die Nationalmannschaft


Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:37 pm
Profile
Career Elite Player
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:43 am
Posts: 2250
Location: Minneapolis
Post Re: How many wins this year
6-10

_________________
Pull yr 84 jerseys out.


Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:03 pm
Profile
Pro Bowl Elite Player

Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am
Posts: 985
Post Re: How many wins this year
so ponder goes 7 for 14 passing yesterday with 2 picks, and you people think this team can win 7 or 8 games? i say they win 4, one more than last year, and reason to keep frazier around for one more year. i haven't seen anything that leads me to believe ponder has progressed in any way whatsoever, and we will need both a receiver and a qb after this season. face it people, ponder stinks. i look for him to totally bomb the first 5 or 6 weeks and then everyone will finally realize it.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:21 am
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:41 pm
Posts: 277
Location: Pennslyvania
Post Re: How many wins this year
9-7 no playoffs


Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:09 am
Profile
Strong Safety
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Posts: 11402
Location: California
Post Re: How many wins this year
five or six wins the first part of the years except for a game or two is a really easy schedule ..

_________________
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!


Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:09 am
Profile
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 10040
Location: Burbank, California
Post Re: How many wins this year
I said 5 or 6 wins earlier. But I just heard Dan Wiederer from the Strib say in an interview that Coach Frazier vows this will be a "run first" team.

I'm not sure how to take that, especially in a league where passing has become so important. If this is going to be a Childress Lite Conservative offense that lacks imagination, then I think 3 or 4 wins is more likely.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:47 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
losperros wrote:
I said 5 or 6 wins earlier. But I just heard Dan Wiederer from the Strib say in an interview that Coach Frazier vows this will be a "run first" team.

I'm not sure how to take that, especially in a league where passing has become so important. If this is going to be a Childress Lite Conservative offense that lacks imagination, then I think 3 or 4 wins is more likely.


I agree... IF it lacks imagination. However, these days, when a coach say his team will be a "run first" team I tend to interpret that to mean the run will be a point of emphasis, a solid foundation for the offense, because I think every head coach realizes that, to a certain extent, it's a passing league now. Treating the run as the foundation of an offense that doesn't feature Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers or any of the other top-level QBs who can put a team on their shoulders and guide them to the Super Bowl is a sensible approach, as long as it's accompanied by a good overall strategy. Last year, several teams that placed great emphasis on the run had real success during the regular season and advanced past the first round of the playoffs (two of them to the championship games). Denver, Houston, San Francisco and Baltimore were all in the top 10 in rushing yards and rushing attempts. The key is clearly to have a good defense to go with that running game and to have a passing game that can make plays when called upon. The Vikings may not have the defense to be successful that way but I don't think they have the passing game to play the style of football NE or GB play either.

As you know, I don't think running the ball is inherently conservative any more than passing it is inherently aggressive. You used the key word, Craig: imagination. The Vikes have to make sure of two things on offense: they can't be too predictable and they need to execute.

By the way, Craig, just out of curiosity: did Wiederer make that comment on the radio or was it in an article?


Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:27 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: The Great White North
Post Re: How many wins this year
losperros wrote:
I said 5 or 6 wins earlier. But I just heard Dan Wiederer from the Strib say in an interview that Coach Frazier vows this will be a "run first" team.

I'm not sure how to take that, especially in a league where passing has become so important. If this is going to be a Childress Lite Conservative offense that lacks imagination, then I think 3 or 4 wins is more likely.


And here I was thinking Frazier might have learned a few things from his run-first approach last year...

"What do you mean the peg is square? So what? That peg is going in that hole... Mind over matter guys!"

I'm not nearly as willing to cut Frazier slack on this point as Jim is. Run "first" means the run comes first. It's the point of emphasis. If he meant to say the Vikes will emphasize the run, then he should have said that. If he meant they want to remain an effective running team, or a balanced attack, he could have said that. But he didn't - he said run "first". All that tells me is he learned little from his experience last year and is bound to repeat much of it this year. I have no idea how that will play out in terms of final record, but I can tell how that is likely to play out with the fans of the team who will have to sit through another slogging season of run-heavy offensive football.

I like Frazier as a person and I really want to like him as a coach, but I just don't see how he's going to survive beyond this season if he doesn't wake up and smell the NFL coffee. It's great to be able to run. It's great to be able to "exert your will" as Childress used to say. But as great as that is, the fact remains that the league is designed to favor passing and it will be for the foreseeable future. While some teams that made the playoffs could run, every one of them could pass, and the fact remains that two of the worst-running teams during the regular season met in the Superbowl for, what, like the 10th year-in-a-row? That's probably hyperbole but still, the point has been made to anyone with a pair of eyes that running is just not that important in the greater scheme of things. The Packers couldn't run to save their lives last year and they finished with 15 wins and probably should have gone back to the Superbowl. And what did Ted Thompson do this offseason? Did he shore up that obvious weak spot? No, he allowed the one reliable veteran runner the Pack had to walk and they're going into the season relying on a guy who has yet to finish a season healthy with no proven option behind that guy.

I'm getting a headache thinking about this. If Frazier insists on creating his own reality he's just not going to be coaching this team beyond this season. I think it's as simple as that.


Last edited by VikingLord on Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:31 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Posts: 3565
Post Re: How many wins this year
mosscarter wrote:
so ponder goes 7 for 14 passing yesterday with 2 picks, and you people think this team can win 7 or 8 games? i say they win 4, one more than last year, and reason to keep frazier around for one more year. i haven't seen anything that leads me to believe ponder has progressed in any way whatsoever, and we will need both a receiver and a qb after this season. face it people, ponder stinks. i look for him to totally bomb the first 5 or 6 weeks and then everyone will finally realize it.


So since in that scrimmage, where he completed 50% of his passes and had 2 picks, determines the outcome of an upcoming season then you are ready to throw in the towel in already :?: Despite the fact that nearly every source, including his teamates say that he looks a 100% improved over last year. :confused: :lol:

_________________
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:32 pm
Profile
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 23653
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Post Re: How many wins this year
Purple bruise wrote:
mosscarter wrote:
so ponder goes 7 for 14 passing yesterday with 2 picks, and you people think this team can win 7 or 8 games? i say they win 4, one more than last year, and reason to keep frazier around for one more year. i haven't seen anything that leads me to believe ponder has progressed in any way whatsoever, and we will need both a receiver and a qb after this season. face it people, ponder stinks. i look for him to totally bomb the first 5 or 6 weeks and then everyone will finally realize it.


So since in that scrimmage, where he completed 50% of his passes and had 2 picks, determines the outcome of an upcoming season then you are ready to throw in the towel in already :?: Despite the fact that nearly every source, including his teamates say that he looks a 100% improved over last year. :confused: :lol:


I know! Did you see Aaron Rodgers last night? 2-8 for 16 yards and an interception. They'll be lucky to win 2! NFC North Champs here we come!

_________________
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly


Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:46 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
VikingLord wrote:
And here I was thinking Frazier might have learned a few things from his run-first approach last year...

"What do you mean the peg is square? So what? That peg is going in that hole... Mind over matter guys!"

I'm not nearly as willing to cut Frazier slack on this point as Jim is. Run "first" means the run comes first. It's the point of emphasis. If he meant to say the Vikes will emphasize the run, then he should have said that. If he meant they want to remain an effective running team, or a balanced attack, he could have said that. But he didn't - he said run "first". All that tells me is he learned little from his experience last year and is bound to repeat much of it this year. I have no idea how that will play out in terms of final record, but I can tell how that is likely to play out with the fans of the team who will have to sit through another slogging season of run-heavy offensive football.


Somehow, I had a feeling this would bother you, Edward. ;)

Craig wrote "I just heard Dan Wiederer from the Strib say in an interview that Coach Frazier vows this will be a "run first" team" but please keep in mind, that's a second hand quote from a sportswriter, not a direct quote from Leslie Frazier.

I've done some searching since reading Craig's post and I can't find anything recent in which Frazier vows the Vikings offense will be a "run first" unit. However, I did find this, from a few days ago:

http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/V ... b149d421b7

Quote:
Q: Do you have a sense of what the strengths of this offense might be?
A:
We still want to really center around what we can do running the football and our offensive line seems to be coming together. These games that we’ll have in the preseason will give us a good indication of how we are going to be able to achieve our goals of being able to be a team that can really run the football and get people in the eight-man fronts. With the weapons that we think we are surrounding Christian (Ponder) with, be able to expose people because of that. We have a plan for what we want. Now we have to see it come to fruition by how we come together as an offensive line, that’s going to be a big deal for us. We think we have some capable backs, but we want to gel up front because that will determine if we will be able to do the things that we set out to do.


I think that quote makes it clear that they want to to use their running game to set up the pass for their young QB. That's a sound strategy as long as it doesn't become so predictable that it's rendered ineffective and we won't know if that's the case until we see them play some regular season games.

Quote:
While some teams that made the playoffs could run, every one of them could pass, and the fact remains that two of the worst-running teams during the regular season met in the Superbowl for, what, like the 10th year-in-a-row?


NE and NY have QBs far more experienced and proven than Ponder, with better pass blocking lines and better weapons in the passing game. It's also worth noting that although the Giants weren't an effective running team during the season, they were committed to the run in the postseason, averaging 28 carries, 4.2 yards per carry and 116+ yards per game on their way to winning the Super Bowl.

Quote:
That's probably hyperbole but still, the point has been made to anyone with a pair of eyes that running is just not that important in the greater scheme of things. The Packers couldn't run to save their lives last year and they finished with 15 wins and probably should have gone back to the Superbowl. And what did Ted Thompson do this offseason? Did he shore up that obvious weak spot? No, he allowed the one reliable veteran runner the Pack had to walk and they're going into the season relying on a guy who has yet to finish a season healthy with no proven option behind that guy.


Let's see how that works out for them as they attempt to get back to the Super Bowl. :)

Running the ball clearly isn't of paramount importance anymore but it's going too far to say "running is just not that important in the greater scheme of things". It was important to the Giants during their Super Bowl run last postseason. It was also important to two more of the 4 teams who advanced to the conference championships last year. It was significant to the 2009 Saints (6th in rushing), the 2007 Giants (4th in rushing) and the 2005 Steelers (5th in rushing) too and all 3 were SB winners. While it's obviously crucial to have a good QB and a strong passing game if you want to win the Super Bowl, the idea that the running game has been marginalized to the point where it's no longer important in the greater scheme of things just doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Sure, there are teams that have been so strong in other areas that they've been able to win the Super Bowl without much of a running game but those exceptions don't create a new rule. If a team doesn't have a QB like Brady or Rodgers (and the necessary personnel around them) is it realistic at all to believe employing the pass-happy approach their teams use will yield similar results? I sure don't think so. Passing juggernauts have to be built and meanwhile, coaches need to adapt and strategize based on the personnel at hand. I don't think we're so far down the pass-happy road that most NFL coaches would still consider a strong running game to be a young, developing QB's best friend.

Let's wait and see how the 2012 Vikings actually implement their offense in some regular season games before we judge them too harshly.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:50 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm
Posts: 6049
Post Re: How many wins this year
Mothman wrote:
Quote:
That's probably hyperbole but still, the point has been made to anyone with a pair of eyes that running is just not that important in the greater scheme of things. The Packers couldn't run to save their lives last year and they finished with 15 wins and probably should have gone back to the Superbowl. And what did Ted Thompson do this offseason? Did he shore up that obvious weak spot? No, he allowed the one reliable veteran runner the Pack had to walk and they're going into the season relying on a guy who has yet to finish a season healthy with no proven option behind that guy.


Let's see how that works out for them as they attempt to get back to the Super Bowl. :)

Running the ball clearly isn't of paramount importance anymore but it's going too far to say "running is just not that important in the greater scheme of things". It was important to the Giants during their Super Bowl run last postseason. It was also important to two more of the 4 teams who advanced to the conference championships last year. It was significant to the 2009 Saints (6th in rushing), the 2007 Giants (4th in rushing) and the 2005 Steelers (5th in rushing) too and all 3 were SB winners. While it's obviously crucial to have a good QB and a strong passing game if you want to win the Super Bowl, the idea that the running game has been marginalized to the point where it's no longer important in the greater scheme of things just doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Sure, there are teams that have been so strong in other areas that they've been able to win the Super Bowl without much of a running game but those exceptions don't create a new rule. If a team doesn't have a QB like Brady or Rodgers (and the necessary personnel around them) is it realistic at all to believe employing the pass-happy approach their teams use will yield similar results? I sure don't think so. Passing juggernauts have to be built and meanwhile, coaches need to adapt and strategize based on the personnel at hand. I don't think we're so far down the pass-happy road that most NFL coaches would still consider a strong running game to be a young, developing QB's best friend.

Let's wait and see how the 2012 Vikings actually implement their offense in some regular season games before we judge them too harshly.


Just as an observation, we can theorize all we want about whether or not the Packers should have went to the Super Bowl, the unpleasant fact (for them) is they won as many post season games as the Vikings did last year. I'm not saying that the running game is the "end all" to having a successful team, I'm just saying that anytime a team is "one-dimensional" the defensive side of the ball becomes much clearer. Maybe it wasn't such a shocker the Packers didn't go to the Super Bowl. Now I'll admit that if I have to be "one-dimensional" I'd rather have the passing game of the Packers than our running game (as good as it is) as I think the chances for success are greater. But I think a balanced "above-average" offense will cover a "multitude of sins" with good playcalling to elevate that offense to elite (or near elite quality). I'm not sure, but I suspect the passing game of those aforementioned teams that won Super Bowls despite have little of a running game, were more of a product of the fact they didn't have to run at all since the defense couldn't stop the passing game.

It's a subtle but a distinct difference if I don't run because I choose not to vs. I pass because I can't run. In the first instance, the total yards of rushing might be small because I run only enough to keep the defense honest against the pass, but when I do it is effective. If I don't run because I can't, the defenses job just became alot clearer.

_________________
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!


Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:30 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
Posts: 5627
Post Re: How many wins this year
What is so bad about this team being a run first team? We've got a sophmore quarterback starting his first season as the quarterback and our backfield is Peterson, Gerhardt and occasionally Percy Harvin.

I say....

6-10. I'd be pleasantly surprised with 8-8 considering that the Packers are elite, the Lions are great and the Bears are a sleeper Super Bowl pick for me. Going 8-8 with Ponder in this monster of a NFC North division would thrill me.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:31 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:41 pm
Posts: 6049
Post Re: How many wins this year
Hunter Morrow wrote:
the Bears are a sleeper Super Bowl pick for me.



I agree. If the Bears go to the Super Bowl it will be a "sleeper" :P

_________________
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!


Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:38 pm
Profile
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 10040
Location: Burbank, California
Post Re: How many wins this year
Mothman wrote:
VikingLord wrote:
And here I was thinking Frazier might have learned a few things from his run-first approach last year...

"What do you mean the peg is square? So what? That peg is going in that hole... Mind over matter guys!"

I'm not nearly as willing to cut Frazier slack on this point as Jim is. Run "first" means the run comes first. It's the point of emphasis. If he meant to say the Vikes will emphasize the run, then he should have said that. If he meant they want to remain an effective running team, or a balanced attack, he could have said that. But he didn't - he said run "first". All that tells me is he learned little from his experience last year and is bound to repeat much of it this year. I have no idea how that will play out in terms of final record, but I can tell how that is likely to play out with the fans of the team who will have to sit through another slogging season of run-heavy offensive football.


Somehow, I had a feeling this would bother you, Edward. ;)

Craig wrote "I just heard Dan Wiederer from the Strib say in an interview that Coach Frazier vows this will be a "run first" team" but please keep in mind, that's a second hand quote from a sportswriter, not a direct quote from Leslie Frazier.

I've done some searching since reading Craig's post and I can't find anything recent in which Frazier vows the Vikings offense will be a "run first" unit.


Jim, listen to the video part of this page, which is very current (maybe yesterday). This is where I heard Wiederer's quote:

http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikin ... ml?refer=y

Sorry I didn't get back on this sooner, but I just now looked at the board again.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:44 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Candidate

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:37 pm
Posts: 3006
Post Re: How many wins this year
It's really hard to say. The whole D is a big question mark besides Jared Allen. The offense appears to be moving toward heavy reliance on TE. But so much depends on AD's recovery, Ponder's improving big time, and Simpson's breaking out at WR. So I bracket 2012 between 2-14 and 6-10, with much to be learned Weeks 1 and 2.


Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:57 pm
Profile
All Pro Elite Player

Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:45 am
Posts: 1160
Location: Minnesota
Post Re: How many wins this year
bigskyeric wrote:
How many games did we lose by one play last season? All but Saints, Bears (road) and Pack (road)... I'll say 13-3 :rock:


Thanks, I needed a good laugh. If they can go 8-8 this year I would be very pleased with the improvement but realistically I think a 5-6 win season is likely


Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:43 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 7158
Location: bakersfield california
Post Re: How many wins this year
6-10


Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:18 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
losperros wrote:
Jim, listen to the video part of this page, which is very current (maybe yesterday). This is where I heard Wiederer's quote:

http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikin ... ml?refer=y

Sorry I didn't get back on this sooner, but I just now looked at the board again.


No problem, Craig. I figured you'd get back to it when you had time.

I didn't see a video at the link, just an article about Zack Bowman.

It doesn't really matter anyway. I was curious about where you heard Wiederer's comment but I never doubted that you heard it. :)


Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:38 am
Profile
Commissioner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Posts: 10040
Location: Burbank, California
Post Re: How many wins this year
Mothman wrote:

No problem, Craig. I figured you'd get back to it when you had time.

I didn't see a video at the link, just an article about Zack Bowman.

It doesn't really matter anyway. I was curious about where you heard Wiederer's comment but I never doubted that you heard it. :)



Well, the #$%& video was there before, but now it's not. I don't know what happened.

Anyway, I'm concerned about the "run first" comments but not worrying about them. We'll see what happens.

I guess I'm still rehabbing from the Chili years. :D


Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:02 am
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
losperros wrote:
Well, the #$%& video was there before, but now it's not. I don't know what happened.


They removed it to vex you! :)

Quote:
Anyway, I'm concerned about the "run first" comments but not worrying about them. We'll see what happens.

I guess I'm still rehabbing from the Chili years. :D


Honestly, I think that's it. It's understandable.


Sat Aug 11, 2012 1:21 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
I found this piece at NFL.com dating back to July 9th but it's al labout expectations for the Vikes this year so it pertains to the subject of this thread.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8 ... s-for-2012

Several of the writers/experts/pundits (call them what you like) at NFL.com seem to think the Vikes are a prime candidate to end up with the first pick in the 2013 draft. Sadly, that's far from impossible but it would be disappointing (the poor season, not the pick itself).

I'm still more or less where I was at 3 months ago regarding the Vikes record. I think 8-8 is possible but it would be a very impressive leap forward. 6-10, which would double last season's win total, would be a nice improvement but I'm not sure this is even a 6-10 roster. Frazier has his work cut out for him and even if he does an excellent coaching job, he might have a hard time coaxing 6 wins out of this team. The Vikes will need their best players to stay healthy and deliver some of their best football if they're going to win 6 games or more. I'm beginning to think 4-5 wins is more realistic.


Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:35 pm
Profile
Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: The Great White North
Post Re: How many wins this year
Mothman wrote:
I found this piece at NFL.com dating back to July 9th but it's al labout expectations for the Vikes this year so it pertains to the subject of this thread.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8 ... s-for-2012

Several of the writers/experts/pundits (call them what you like) at NFL.com seem to think the Vikes are a prime candidate to end up with the first pick in the 2013 draft. Sadly, that's far from impossible but it would be disappointing (the poor season, not the pick itself).

I'm still more or less where I was at 3 months ago regarding the Vikes record. I think 8-8 is possible but it would be a very impressive leap forward. 6-10, which would double last season's win total, would be a nice improvement but I'm not sure this is even a 6-10 roster. Frazier has his work cut out for him and even if he does an excellent coaching job, he might have a hard time coaxing 6 wins out of this team. The Vikes will need their best players to stay healthy and deliver some of their best football if they're going to win 6 games or more. I'm beginning to think 4-5 wins is more realistic.


I would have expected an improvement of some sort this season, but after watching the starting Viking defense against a solid, but unspectacular, 49er offense, I'd say they'll be lucky to get 3 wins again. Ponder and the offense look to be pedestrian. They'll probably improve as the season goes on, but if the defense is that bad they're going to just get pounded by the other offenses in the North.


Sat Aug 11, 2012 5:20 pm
Profile
Defensive Tackle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Posts: 37219
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Re: How many wins this year
VikingLord wrote:
I would have expected an improvement of some sort this season, but after watching the starting Viking defense against a solid, but unspectacular, 49er offense, I'd say they'll be lucky to get 3 wins again. Ponder and the offense look to be pedestrian. They'll probably improve as the season goes on, but if the defense is that bad they're going to just get pounded by the other offenses in the North.


The Vikes performance was discouraging but I wouldn't take too much away from a preseason game. The defense was missing arguably it's 3 best players (Allen, Kevin Williams and Winfield) and the starting offense might have looked pedestrian to you but they were also without their two best players (Harvin and Peterson). The Vikes and 49ers play each other pretty early in the season so I doubt either team was ready to reveal much and there was probably no real game-planning for the game. On top of all that, the 49ers were close to reaching the Super Bowl last year and they clearly have a deeper, more talented roster than the Vikings. Considering where the two teams are in their development, they should be able to best the Vikes in a preseason game.

If the Vikes are going to get to 6 wins this season, they'll probably have to do it by beating opponents like Indy, Jacksonville and St. Louis.

Jim


Sat Aug 11, 2012 5:48 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 9man, Alaskan, Baidu [Spider], halfgiz, mansquatch and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.