Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
| Author |
Message |
|
dead_poet
Commissioner
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm Posts: 13517 Location: Des Moines, Iowa
|
 Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Quote: Every team has limited cap resources and must divide them wisely. No team has two receivers with contracts averaging at least $6 million a year -- which is precisely what the Vikings would have been staring down with Bowe and Harvin after the season.
That's why draft picks are valued so highly and receiver is likely to be among the Vikings' top targets in April. Early projections have Cal's Keenan Allen, Tennessee's Justin Hunter and Southern Cal's Robert Woods as first-round prospects.
They could go the free-agent route, too, as they tried with Pierre Garcon before he signed a five-year, $42.5 million deal with Washington in March. But the crop of receivers under 30 with expiring contracts is thin, with Bowe and Green Bay's Greg Jennings a sizeable cut above the rest.
For now, it's Harvin, Jerome Simpson and Michael Jenkins, plus whatever they can get from Stephen Burton, Devin Aromashodu and Jarius Wright. Simpson and Aromashodu are on one-year deals, and Jenkins has a $2.425 million roster bonus due in March that almost surely won't be paid.
The Vikings can do better. They know that better than anyone. But they're building for the long haul, not selling out for 2012, and expecting a quick fix at any position was a pipe drem. http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/Peli ... Vikings%29
_________________ “Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:58 am |
|
 |
|
mansquatch
All Pro Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm Posts: 1619 Location: Coon Rapids, MN
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
As much as the WR play outside of Harvin has been lack luster, I am just fine with this approach. Going a different route would make a lot of sense if we felt we were that team that is 1 guy away, but we are not that team right now.
_________________ Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:36 am |
|
 |
|
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am Posts: 23726 Location: Chicago, IL
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
I don't have a problem with it either and Tom Pelissero did a nice job of outlining just why the Vikings didn't make a move to get someone like Bowe before the trade deadline. Supposedly, despite his protests to the contrary, Simpson still isn't 100%, which may explain why he's not getting the kind of separation we'd like to see. With luck, he has an extra gear we haven't seen this season and will see soon and that will make a difference. If he can solidify one of the outside positions, and if the Vikes can then re-sign him, a well-chosen draft pick might give the Vikes the other outside WR they need and complete a good trio of wideouts. Then they'll just need to improve depth. Sounds easy, eh? 
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:41 am |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Interesting. No problem overpaying for an injury prone TE, but for the love of god, dont pay a viable WR to help our happy feet QB. yeah, makes sense.
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:43 am |
|
 |
|
mansquatch
All Pro Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm Posts: 1619 Location: Coon Rapids, MN
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
They signed Carslon to a lot less guarranteed money than some of the big ticket FA out there. They can (and at this point, probably will) cut him and the hit will only happen next year and then he'll be off the books.
FA is always a gamble, so far Simpson is ticking more towards a bad move than a good one. The fan reaction to him is only muted because his peers on the team are just that much worse than he is. Carlson doesn't have that luxury.
I don't mind their strategy. They are in a position to offer Harvin the contract he has earned. If they had taken the plunge on a CB or WR we might not be in that position.
_________________ Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:14 am |
|
 |
|
Lash Man
Career Elite Player
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:11 pm Posts: 2412 Location: Middle Earth
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Guess im a desenting fan because the good teams like New England just do it when they need help at position they do what it takes . The best way around overpaying is just sign them to a one year prove it deal then go from there , we can make all the excuses about it but in my opinion wideout is the biggest weakness of this team and Bowe is an upgrade over everyone but Harvin .
_________________ Bring On The Draft !
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:15 am |
|
 |
|
joe h
Backup
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:54 am Posts: 84
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Mark my words, Harvin will be getting a slap in the face offer, and will most likely hold out until the start of the 2013 season. At which point the Vikings could offer him the world and he won't take it. We will have 3 wr, a qb, and several db holes that need to be filled before we can be considered perennial contenders again.
I would rather we trade Harvin for a garbage pick or two, if Spielman/Frazier are no longer playing to win.
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:51 am |
|
 |
|
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am Posts: 23726 Location: Chicago, IL
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Lash Man wrote: Guess im a desenting fan because the good teams like New England just do it when they need help at position they do what it takes . The best way around overpaying is just sign them to a one year prove it deal then go from there , we can make all the excuses about it but in my opinion wideout is the biggest weakness of this team and Bowe is an upgrade over everyone but Harvin . Bowe's contract expires after this season. Once his contract is up, it's unlikely he'd settle for a one year deal and it's unlikely he'd have to settle for one. The Vikes would either have traded a draft pick (or picks) to acquire Bowe for 1/2 a season or they'd need to pay him pretty serious money next year to keep him. That money could be in the form of a long term deal with a substantial signing bonus or it could be "franchise tag" money which means they'd be paying him as if he was a top 5 receiver... which he's not.
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:09 pm |
|
 |
|
S197
Hall of Famer
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm Posts: 5572 Location: Hawaii
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
As long as this keeps Harvin here, I'm fine with not going after Bowe.
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 1:04 pm |
|
 |
|
Lash Man
Career Elite Player
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:11 pm Posts: 2412 Location: Middle Earth
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Mothman wrote: Lash Man wrote: Guess im a desenting fan because the good teams like New England just do it when they need help at position they do what it takes . The best way around overpaying is just sign them to a one year prove it deal then go from there , we can make all the excuses about it but in my opinion wideout is the biggest weakness of this team and Bowe is an upgrade over everyone but Harvin . Bowe's contract expires after this season. Once his contract is up, it's unlikely he'd settle for a one year deal and it's unlikely he'd have to settle for one. The Vikes would either have traded a draft pick (or picks) to acquire Bowe for 1/2 a season or they'd need to pay him pretty serious money next year to keep him. That money could be in the form of a long term deal with a substantial signing bonus or it could be "franchise tag" money which means they'd be paying him as if he was a top 5 receiver... which he's not. Wow a franchise tag lol I was just wanting an option on getting a better player at a position of need lets not over react to my opinion and it is an opinion only the Vikings org, will do what they want no matter what I or you or any other message board messiah thinks .
_________________ Bring On The Draft !
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:02 pm |
|
 |
|
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am Posts: 23726 Location: Chicago, IL
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Lash Man wrote: Wow a franchise tag lol I was just wanting an option on getting a better player at a position of need lets not over react to my opinion and it is an opinion only the Vikings org, will do what they want no matter what I or you or any other message board messiah thinks . I think you may have misunderstood me. I wasn't suggesting you think Bowe is a franchise player. You wrote "The best way around overpaying is just sign them to a one year prove it deal then go from there" and I was responding to that part of your post. My point w s that bowes is only under contract through this season. If the Vikes had traded for him, they'd be guaranteed to have him on their roster for the rest of this season. That's it. 8 games plus the postseason, if they get there. After that, he'd be a free agent and he could choose to go to any team that made him an offer he liked unless the Vikes either re-signed him or used the franchise tag to prevent him from leaving. Put simply, signing him to a one year contract probably wouldn't be an option. A team doesn't make a trade like that unless they think the player is the missing piece to a current run at the Super Bowl or unless they're willing to give him the lucrative long term deal he'll be seeking.
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:48 pm |
|
 |
|
Purplemania
Career Elite Player
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:51 pm Posts: 2013
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
I like Bowe, but I don't think he's as good as people around here thinks. Hell, he can't even help his QB in KC, and many could argue Ponder to be equal to that of Cassel or even Quinn -_- I would be able to trade for him but like I said, nothing higher than a 4th. Also, with Bowe stinking this year, it will be cheaper to sign him if we wanted...
But he's not the guy I would target. I'm pretty sure GB will let Jennings go. I think Jennings can be had for a reasonable price....
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:50 pm |
|
 |
|
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm Posts: 3926
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Mothman wrote: Lash Man wrote: Guess im a desenting fan because the good teams like New England just do it when they need help at position they do what it takes . The best way around overpaying is just sign them to a one year prove it deal then go from there , we can make all the excuses about it but in my opinion wideout is the biggest weakness of this team and Bowe is an upgrade over everyone but Harvin . Bowe's contract expires after this season. Once his contract is up, it's unlikely he'd settle for a one year deal and it's unlikely he'd have to settle for one. The Vikes would either have traded a draft pick (or picks) to acquire Bowe for 1/2 a season or they'd need to pay him pretty serious money next year to keep him. That money could be in the form of a long term deal with a substantial signing bonus or it could be "franchise tag" money which means they'd be paying him as if he was a top 5 receiver... which he's not. Heck, Jim ... they'd have to pay some serious money THIS SEASON. I believe the article says he has $5.04 million left on his contract. Considering he wouldn't be up to speed for probably the first 3 or 4 games, that's way too much. We have an outside chance of making the playoffs this season, but only because the other NFC divisions are are so bad, outside of their leaders. There is no reason to sell the farm to get one player who would likely walk after the season in search of even bigger money.
_________________ "Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:21 pm |
|
 |
|
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am Posts: 23726 Location: Chicago, IL
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
J. Kapp 11 wrote: Heck, Jim ... they'd have to pay some serious money THIS SEASON. I believe the article says he has $5.04 million left on his contract. Considering he wouldn't be up to speed for probably the first 3 or 4 games, that's way too much. It sure is... and I wasn't even thinking about that!
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 6:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Arma
Starter
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:33 pm Posts: 121
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
FYI no team locks up 2 WRs at 6m each. Bowe was never an option. But hey, lets hate our FO its a cool thing to do right?
_________________ Whenever i step outside, somebody claims to see the light It seems to me that all of us have lost our patience. 'cause everyone thinks they're right, And nobody thinks that there just might Be more than one road to our final destination--
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:31 pm |
|
 |
|
Lash Man
Career Elite Player
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:11 pm Posts: 2412 Location: Middle Earth
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Arma wrote: FYI no team locks up 2 WRs at 6m each. Bowe was never an option. But hey, lets hate our FO its a cool thing to do right? Who said anything about hating the front office ? I just said id like to get Bowe because I see this season as being better than I expected and thought he could be a big help .
_________________ Bring On The Draft !
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:45 pm |
|
 |
|
Arma
Starter
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:33 pm Posts: 121
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Lash Man wrote: Arma wrote: FYI no team locks up 2 WRs at 6m each. Bowe was never an option. But hey, lets hate our FO its a cool thing to do right? Who said anything about hating the front office ? I just said id like to get Bowe because I see this season as being better than I expected and thought he could be a big help . Except when that idea is no way possible and healthy for the future of our team. And "Interesting. No problem overpaying for an injury prone TE, but for the love of god, dont pay a viable WR to help our happy feet QB. yeah, makes sense." sounds like hating to me. This isn't Madden guys.
_________________ Whenever i step outside, somebody claims to see the light It seems to me that all of us have lost our patience. 'cause everyone thinks they're right, And nobody thinks that there just might Be more than one road to our final destination--
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:20 pm |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
At some point we HAVE to pay big money for a vet WR. Either through draft picks or cash, lotsa cash. I dont like Ponder, but we needs to see what he can do. I think alot on this board were wrong and Simpson wont help help. I dont think a rookie WR will either (unless we somehow get a Jones or Blackmon) because thats not how the Vikings do thing (afraid of the Hershal Walker deal). We need a REAL WR here and it isnt the end of the world if we give alot up and maybe have to fill some holes with less then steller players.
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:33 pm |
|
 |
|
Arma
Starter
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:33 pm Posts: 121
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
PurpleKoolaid wrote: At some point we HAVE to pay big money for a vet WR. Either through draft picks or cash, lotsa cash. I dont like Ponder, but we needs to see what he can do. I think alot on this board were wrong and Simpson wont help help. I dont think a rookie WR will either (unless we somehow get a Jones or Blackmon) because thats not how the Vikings do thing (afraid of the Hershal Walker deal). We need a REAL WR here and it isnt the end of the world if we give alot up and maybe have to fill some holes with less then steller players. The draft is deep again with quality wide outs. Justin Hunter should be our first look, scary talented. I read one scout even comparing him to Randy Moss, I know very far stretched, but the guy has a lot of talent. The only FA Wideout we should be interested in is Jennings because I doubt he'll command a huge sum, favorable, but not huge. By the time hes done hopefully our first round WR is hitting huge strides and maybe *crosses fingers* we get back Childs. ____ Quote: Hunter’s size, track speed, and freakish athleticism have opened the door to Randy Moss comparisons. While these comparisons may be a little premature just 33 receptions into his college career, they aren’t exactly unfounded either. http://frogsfootballfantasy.com/prospec ... unter.html
_________________ Whenever i step outside, somebody claims to see the light It seems to me that all of us have lost our patience. 'cause everyone thinks they're right, And nobody thinks that there just might Be more than one road to our final destination--
|
| Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:26 pm |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Arma wrote: PurpleKoolaid wrote: At some point we HAVE to pay big money for a vet WR. Either through draft picks or cash, lotsa cash. I dont like Ponder, but we needs to see what he can do. I think alot on this board were wrong and Simpson wont help help. I dont think a rookie WR will either (unless we somehow get a Jones or Blackmon) because thats not how the Vikings do thing (afraid of the Hershal Walker deal). We need a REAL WR here and it isnt the end of the world if we give alot up and maybe have to fill some holes with less then steller players. The draft is deep again with quality wide outs. Justin Hunter should be our first look, scary talented. I read one scout even comparing him to Randy Moss, I know very far stretched, but the guy has a lot of talent. The only FA Wideout we should be interested in is Jennings because I doubt he'll command a huge sum, favorable, but not huge. By the time hes done hopefully our first round WR is hitting huge strides and maybe *crosses fingers* we get back Childs. ____ Quote: Hunter’s size, track speed, and freakish athleticism have opened the door to Randy Moss comparisons. While these comparisons may be a little premature just 33 receptions into his college career, they aren’t exactly unfounded either. http://frogsfootballfantasy.com/prospec ... unter.htmlLast years draft, people were saying the same thing and look we we got. As i said before a bust (based on one year) and a busted (one that experts say is hard for a WR to come back 100% from). Im tired of this nonsense of we cant get a vet. Look what winfield has done for this team. The draft is a crap shot. We need a freaking WR right NOW! We have for a few years.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:31 pm |
|
 |
|
MrPurplenGold
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:46 pm Posts: 3585
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
PurpleKoolaid wrote: Arma wrote: PurpleKoolaid wrote: At some point we HAVE to pay big money for a vet WR. Either through draft picks or cash, lotsa cash. I dont like Ponder, but we needs to see what he can do. I think alot on this board were wrong and Simpson wont help help. I dont think a rookie WR will either (unless we somehow get a Jones or Blackmon) because thats not how the Vikings do thing (afraid of the Hershal Walker deal). We need a REAL WR here and it isnt the end of the world if we give alot up and maybe have to fill some holes with less then steller players. The draft is deep again with quality wide outs. Justin Hunter should be our first look, scary talented. I read one scout even comparing him to Randy Moss, I know very far stretched, but the guy has a lot of talent. The only FA Wideout we should be interested in is Jennings because I doubt he'll command a huge sum, favorable, but not huge. By the time hes done hopefully our first round WR is hitting huge strides and maybe *crosses fingers* we get back Childs. ____ Quote: Hunter’s size, track speed, and freakish athleticism have opened the door to Randy Moss comparisons. While these comparisons may be a little premature just 33 receptions into his college career, they aren’t exactly unfounded either. http://frogsfootballfantasy.com/prospec ... unter.htmlLast years draft, people were saying the same thing and look we we got. As i said before a bust (based on one year) and a busted (one that experts say is hard for a WR to come back 100% from). Im tired of this nonsense of we cant get a vet. Look what winfield has done for this team. The draft is a crap shot. We need a freaking WR right NOW! We have for a few years. What we got last year was a Left Tackle that's started since day one, a Safety that's started since day one, and a CB that's been heavily involved in the CB rotation and will be starting from now on. As of right now it seems as we missed on two-fourth round pick WR's. Show me one team that has developed "this year's" 4th round pick into a stud.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:12 pm |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
My point was, we knew a MAJOR need last year was for a WR. Too a point where alot of people thought we might pick Blackmon over Kalil. We got Simpson, a PI specialist, and Carlson, the most overpaid TE in the history of the NFL, doing nothing for us. They havent helped Ponder at all. And our draft picks, that everyone says we HAVE to have to build this team around, will turn out to be busts, IMO. Childs might make it, but I doubt it. Spend the friggin money ona real WR. Not a #2 or 3, a #1. Make a deal, make it happen. Pretend we are like all the other teams in the NFL.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:28 pm |
|
 |
|
MrPurplenGold
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:46 pm Posts: 3585
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
PurpleKoolaid wrote: My point was, we knew a MAJOR need last year was for a WR. Too a point where alot of people thought we might pick Blackmon over Kalil. We got Simpson, a PI specialist, and Carlson, the most overpaid TE in the history of the NFL, doing nothing for us. They havent helped Ponder at all. And our draft picks, that everyone says we HAVE to have to build this team around, will turn out to be busts, IMO. Childs might make it, but I doubt it. Spend the friggin money ona real WR. Not a #2 or 3, a #1. Make a deal, make it happen. Pretend we are like all the other teams in the NFL. The Vikings had multiple needs last year when the draft came around. The back end of their defense was terrible, Charlie Johnson was awful at Left Tackle, Hutchinson was past his prime, they let E.J. Henderson go in free agency so they didn't have an experienced MLB, there was a need for an upgrade at the DT spots because Kevin Williams did not play well last year and Remi Ayodele was terrible. Yes WR was a major need, but the Vikings had a lot of major needs. It's going to take more than one draft to fix the Vikings.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:57 pm |
|
 |
|
PsyDanny
All Pro Elite Player
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 9:24 am Posts: 1174 Location: south minneapolis
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
MrPurplenGold wrote: PurpleKoolaid wrote: My point was, we knew a MAJOR need last year was for a WR. Too a point where alot of people thought we might pick Blackmon over Kalil. We got Simpson, a PI specialist, and Carlson, the most overpaid TE in the history of the NFL, doing nothing for us. They havent helped Ponder at all. And our draft picks, that everyone says we HAVE to have to build this team around, will turn out to be busts, IMO. Childs might make it, but I doubt it. Spend the friggin money ona real WR. Not a #2 or 3, a #1. Make a deal, make it happen. Pretend we are like all the other teams in the NFL. The Vikings had multiple needs last year when the draft came around. The back end of their defense was terrible, Charlie Johnson was awful at Left Tackle, Hutchinson was past his prime, they let E.J. Henderson go in free agency so they didn't have an experienced MLB, there was a need for an upgrade at the DT spots because Kevin Williams did not play well last year and Remi Ayodele was terrible. Yes WR was a major need, but the Vikings had a lot of major needs. It's going to take more than one draft to fix the Vikings. Truth 
_________________ "My anterior orifice is forever causing me extreme difficulty;
therefore, I shall endeavor to acquire some self-control."
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:38 pm |
|
 |
|
mondry
Hall of Famer
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm Posts: 6121
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
Sadly we weren't going to fix every major hole in one offseason, if anyone thought that was possible it's a good idea to rehash your expectations. You would think after the randy moss situation we wouldn't have fans crying to rent a player for 8 games.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:23 pm |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
mondry wrote: Sadly we weren't going to fix every major hole in one offseason, if anyone thought that was possible it's a good idea to rehash your expectations. You would think after the randy moss situation we wouldn't have fans crying to rent a player for 8 games. Who said anything about 8 months? Do you think Fraizer is as incompetent as Childress? We needed a WR as much as, if not more then, any other postion, and we struck out. And I think thats part of the problem with Ponder this year. So we should have tried to fix it. See if it works. If it did, it would fix multiple problems, and we resign to a multiple year contract. Other teams make things, basic things, work. I dont know if i trust Spielman and his FAs though.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:29 pm |
|
 |
|
80 PurplePride 84
Hall of Fame Candidate
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:59 pm Posts: 3203
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
The Vikings were in on Pierre Garcon but weren't willing to give him that ridiculous contract he got. He's a #2 who got #1 money.
This year's FA WR class was weak outside of Vincent Jackson.
_________________ Carter's finally in! Time for a new sig. Taking nominations.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:34 pm |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
80 PurplePride 84 wrote: The Vikings were in on Pierre Garcon but weren't willing to give him that ridiculous contract he got. He's a #2 who got #1 money.
This year's FA WR class was weak outside of Vincent Jackson. And next year will be the same...all the #1 will want the BIG #1 money. And had better pay it or this offense wil continue to stagnant(sp?). It would open everything up with a real ourside threat. Not one we develope, one that already knows the ropes.
|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:24 pm |
|
 |
|
glg
Site Admin
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 9:44 pm Posts: 10806 Location: Chicago, IL
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
PurpleKoolaid wrote: And next year will be the same...all the #1 will want the BIG #1 money. And had better pay it or this offense wil continue to stagnant(sp?). It would open everything up with a real ourside threat. Not one we develope, one that already knows the ropes. So we should pay two guys #1 money? Because that's what we're going to be paying Harvin after this year.
_________________

|
| Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:42 pm |
|
 |
|
PurpleKoolaid
Career Elite Player
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm Posts: 2646
|
 Re: Deadline deal was never in Vikings' plans
glg wrote: PurpleKoolaid wrote: And next year will be the same...all the #1 will want the BIG #1 money. And had better pay it or this offense wil continue to stagnant(sp?). It would open everything up with a real ourside threat. Not one we develope, one that already knows the ropes. So we should pay two guys #1 money? Because that's what we're going to be paying Harvin after this year. Yes. Unless we want another year like this. Ponder needs some outside weapons. We will win maybe 7 this year, maybe 7 next. And people hope by that time, after wasting 3 years, we going t have drafted a number 1 WR. I just think Ponder has to have a Vet NOW or we will be looking for a QB and a WR. And the whole time AD adds years onto his body.
|
| Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:09 am |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|